活动性银屑病关节炎中的正常c反应蛋白:来自真实世界临床实践的结果。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1759720X221122417
Chrysoula G Gialouri, Gerasimos Evangelatos, Maria Pappa, Anastasios Karamanakos, Alexios Iliopoulos, Maria G Tektonidou, Petros P Sfikakis, George E Fragoulis
{"title":"活动性银屑病关节炎中的正常c反应蛋白:来自真实世界临床实践的结果。","authors":"Chrysoula G Gialouri,&nbsp;Gerasimos Evangelatos,&nbsp;Maria Pappa,&nbsp;Anastasios Karamanakos,&nbsp;Alexios Iliopoulos,&nbsp;Maria G Tektonidou,&nbsp;Petros P Sfikakis,&nbsp;George E Fragoulis","doi":"10.1177/1759720X221122417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The value of normal C-reactive protein (CRP) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is debatable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypothesis that CRP is frequently normal in contemporary real-world PsA patients, despite active disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into two groups: CRP ⩽ 0.5 mg/dl (normal) and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl (increased). Having as dependent variable the CRP status, these groups were compared for disease-related features, including composite disease activity indices [clinical Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) and minimal disease activity (MDA)] and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Agreement between CRP status and cDAPSA/MDA scores was calculated (Cohen's kappa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from consecutive PsA patients attending two outpatient rheumatology clinics (January 2019-June 2021) were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 128 patients enrolled (51.6% females; mean ± standard deviation age: 53.4 ± 11.7 years; 23.4%, 48.4% and 64.1% treated with glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, respectively), two-thirds (66.4%, <i>n</i> = 85) had normal CRP values. CRP status was not associated with any of the disease-related parameters and PROs, but only with ESR [odds ratio: 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.06), <i>p</i> = 0.005]. Among patients with normal CRP, 45.9% (39/85) were on non-MDA state, while 21.2% (18/85) had cDAPSA-moderate and 5.9% (5/85) had cDAPSA-high disease activities. Conversely, 54.2% (39/72) of patients on non-MDA state and 52.3% (23/44) of those with cDAPSA-moderate or cDAPSA-high disease activity had normal CRP values. Cohen's kappa between normal CRP and MDA, cDAPSA-remission, and cDAPSA-remission/low disease activity was -0.26, -0.21 and -0.22, respectively, displaying total disagreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normal CRP in PsA should not be used as surrogate marker of remission or low/MDA, therefore needs to be interpreted with caution in clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23056,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/05/10.1177_1759720X221122417.PMC9445451.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Chrysoula G Gialouri,&nbsp;Gerasimos Evangelatos,&nbsp;Maria Pappa,&nbsp;Anastasios Karamanakos,&nbsp;Alexios Iliopoulos,&nbsp;Maria G Tektonidou,&nbsp;Petros P Sfikakis,&nbsp;George E Fragoulis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1759720X221122417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The value of normal C-reactive protein (CRP) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is debatable.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To test the hypothesis that CRP is frequently normal in contemporary real-world PsA patients, despite active disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into two groups: CRP ⩽ 0.5 mg/dl (normal) and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl (increased). Having as dependent variable the CRP status, these groups were compared for disease-related features, including composite disease activity indices [clinical Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) and minimal disease activity (MDA)] and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Agreement between CRP status and cDAPSA/MDA scores was calculated (Cohen's kappa).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from consecutive PsA patients attending two outpatient rheumatology clinics (January 2019-June 2021) were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 128 patients enrolled (51.6% females; mean ± standard deviation age: 53.4 ± 11.7 years; 23.4%, 48.4% and 64.1% treated with glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, respectively), two-thirds (66.4%, <i>n</i> = 85) had normal CRP values. CRP status was not associated with any of the disease-related parameters and PROs, but only with ESR [odds ratio: 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.06), <i>p</i> = 0.005]. Among patients with normal CRP, 45.9% (39/85) were on non-MDA state, while 21.2% (18/85) had cDAPSA-moderate and 5.9% (5/85) had cDAPSA-high disease activities. Conversely, 54.2% (39/72) of patients on non-MDA state and 52.3% (23/44) of those with cDAPSA-moderate or cDAPSA-high disease activity had normal CRP values. Cohen's kappa between normal CRP and MDA, cDAPSA-remission, and cDAPSA-remission/low disease activity was -0.26, -0.21 and -0.22, respectively, displaying total disagreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Normal CRP in PsA should not be used as surrogate marker of remission or low/MDA, therefore needs to be interpreted with caution in clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d8/05/10.1177_1759720X221122417.PMC9445451.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221122417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221122417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:正常c反应蛋白(CRP)在银屑病关节炎(PsA)中的价值是有争议的。目的:验证CRP在当代真实PsA患者中经常是正常的假设,尽管疾病处于活动性。设计:在这个横断面研究中,患者被分为两组:CRP≥0.5 mg/dl(正常)和CRP > 0.5 mg/dl(升高)。将CRP状态作为依赖变量,比较这些组的疾病相关特征,包括综合疾病活动性指数[银屑病关节炎的临床疾病活动性(cDAPSA)和最小疾病活动性(MDA)]和患者报告的结局(PROs)。计算CRP状态与cDAPSA/MDA评分之间的一致性(Cohen’s kappa)。方法:分析2019年1月至2021年6月在两个风湿病门诊连续就诊的PsA患者的数据。结果:纳入的128例患者中(51.6%为女性;平均±标准差年龄:53.4±11.7岁;使用糖皮质激素、常规合成抗风湿药物(csDMARDs)和生物抗风湿药物治疗的患者分别为23.4%、48.4%和64.1%,其中三分之二(66.4%,n = 85) CRP正常。CRP状态与任何疾病相关参数和PROs均无相关性,但仅与ESR相关[优势比:1.04(95%可信区间:1.01-1.06),p = 0.005]。在CRP正常的患者中,45.9%(39/85)处于非mda状态,21.2%(18/85)为cdapsa中度,5.9%(5/85)为cdapsa高活动性。相反,54.2%(39/72)的非mda状态患者和52.3%(23/44)的cdapsa中度或高疾病活动性患者的CRP值正常。正常CRP与MDA、cdapsa缓解和cdapsa缓解/低疾病活动性之间的Cohen’s kappa分别为-0.26、-0.21和-0.22,完全不一致。结论:PsA CRP正常不应作为缓解或低/MDA的替代指标,在临床决策时需谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.

Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.

Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.

Normal C-reactive protein in active psoriatic arthritis: results from real-world clinical practice.

Background: The value of normal C-reactive protein (CRP) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is debatable.

Objectives: To test the hypothesis that CRP is frequently normal in contemporary real-world PsA patients, despite active disease.

Design: In this cross-sectional study, patients were divided into two groups: CRP ⩽ 0.5 mg/dl (normal) and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl (increased). Having as dependent variable the CRP status, these groups were compared for disease-related features, including composite disease activity indices [clinical Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) and minimal disease activity (MDA)] and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Agreement between CRP status and cDAPSA/MDA scores was calculated (Cohen's kappa).

Methods: Data from consecutive PsA patients attending two outpatient rheumatology clinics (January 2019-June 2021) were analysed.

Results: From 128 patients enrolled (51.6% females; mean ± standard deviation age: 53.4 ± 11.7 years; 23.4%, 48.4% and 64.1% treated with glucocorticoids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, respectively), two-thirds (66.4%, n = 85) had normal CRP values. CRP status was not associated with any of the disease-related parameters and PROs, but only with ESR [odds ratio: 1.04 (95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.06), p = 0.005]. Among patients with normal CRP, 45.9% (39/85) were on non-MDA state, while 21.2% (18/85) had cDAPSA-moderate and 5.9% (5/85) had cDAPSA-high disease activities. Conversely, 54.2% (39/72) of patients on non-MDA state and 52.3% (23/44) of those with cDAPSA-moderate or cDAPSA-high disease activity had normal CRP values. Cohen's kappa between normal CRP and MDA, cDAPSA-remission, and cDAPSA-remission/low disease activity was -0.26, -0.21 and -0.22, respectively, displaying total disagreement.

Conclusion: Normal CRP in PsA should not be used as surrogate marker of remission or low/MDA, therefore needs to be interpreted with caution in clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of musculoskeletal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信