对甲醛和乙醛诱导的突变模式的分析揭示了一个共同的突变特征的相似性。

IF 2.2
Mahanish J Thapa, Reena M Fabros, Salma Alasmar, Kin Chan
{"title":"对甲醛和乙醛诱导的突变模式的分析揭示了一个共同的突变特征的相似性。","authors":"Mahanish J Thapa,&nbsp;Reena M Fabros,&nbsp;Salma Alasmar,&nbsp;Kin Chan","doi":"10.1093/g3journal/jkac238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are reactive small molecules produced endogenously in cells as well as being environmental contaminants. Both of these small aldehydes are classified as human carcinogens, since they are known to damage DNA and exposure is linked to cancer incidence. However, the mutagenic properties of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde remain incompletely understood, at least in part because they are relatively weak mutagens. Here, we use a highly sensitive yeast genetic reporter system featuring controlled generation of long single-stranded DNA regions to show that both small aldehydes induced mutational patterns characterized by predominantly C/G → A/T, C/G → T/A, and T/A → C/G substitutions, each in similar proportions. We observed an excess of C/G → A/T transversions when compared to mock-treated controls. Many of these C/G → A/T transversions occurred at TC/GA motifs. Interestingly, the formaldehyde mutational pattern resembles single base substitution signature 40 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Single base substitution signature 40 is a mutational signature of unknown etiology. We also noted that acetaldehyde treatment caused an excess of deletion events longer than 4 bases while formaldehyde did not. This latter result could be another distinguishing feature between the mutational patterns of these simple aldehydes. These findings shed new light on the characteristics of 2 important, commonly occurring mutagens.</p>","PeriodicalId":520629,"journal":{"name":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635668/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses of mutational patterns induced by formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reveal similarity to a common mutational signature.\",\"authors\":\"Mahanish J Thapa,&nbsp;Reena M Fabros,&nbsp;Salma Alasmar,&nbsp;Kin Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/g3journal/jkac238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are reactive small molecules produced endogenously in cells as well as being environmental contaminants. Both of these small aldehydes are classified as human carcinogens, since they are known to damage DNA and exposure is linked to cancer incidence. However, the mutagenic properties of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde remain incompletely understood, at least in part because they are relatively weak mutagens. Here, we use a highly sensitive yeast genetic reporter system featuring controlled generation of long single-stranded DNA regions to show that both small aldehydes induced mutational patterns characterized by predominantly C/G → A/T, C/G → T/A, and T/A → C/G substitutions, each in similar proportions. We observed an excess of C/G → A/T transversions when compared to mock-treated controls. Many of these C/G → A/T transversions occurred at TC/GA motifs. Interestingly, the formaldehyde mutational pattern resembles single base substitution signature 40 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Single base substitution signature 40 is a mutational signature of unknown etiology. We also noted that acetaldehyde treatment caused an excess of deletion events longer than 4 bases while formaldehyde did not. This latter result could be another distinguishing feature between the mutational patterns of these simple aldehydes. These findings shed new light on the characteristics of 2 important, commonly occurring mutagens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9635668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"G3 (Bethesda, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

甲醛和乙醛是细胞内源性产生的活性小分子,也是环境污染物。这两种小醛都被列为人类致癌物,因为已知它们会破坏DNA,接触它们与癌症发病率有关。然而,甲醛和乙醛的诱变特性仍然不完全清楚,至少部分原因是它们是相对较弱的诱变剂。在这里,我们使用了一个高度敏感的酵母遗传报告系统,该系统具有控制长单链DNA区域的产生,以显示两种小醛诱导的突变模式主要是C/G→a /T, C/G→T/ a和T/ a→C/G取代,每种替换的比例相似。与模拟处理的对照组相比,我们观察到C/G→A/T转换的过量。这些C/G→A/T转换大多发生在TC/GA基序上。有趣的是,甲醛突变模式类似于癌症体细胞突变目录中的单碱基取代特征40。单碱基替换标记40是一个病因不明的突变标记。我们还注意到,乙醛处理导致超过4个碱基的删除事件过量,而甲醛则没有。后一种结果可能是这些简单醛的突变模式之间的另一个区别特征。这些发现揭示了两种重要的、经常发生的诱变剂的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analyses of mutational patterns induced by formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reveal similarity to a common mutational signature.

Analyses of mutational patterns induced by formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reveal similarity to a common mutational signature.

Analyses of mutational patterns induced by formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reveal similarity to a common mutational signature.

Analyses of mutational patterns induced by formaldehyde and acetaldehyde reveal similarity to a common mutational signature.

Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are reactive small molecules produced endogenously in cells as well as being environmental contaminants. Both of these small aldehydes are classified as human carcinogens, since they are known to damage DNA and exposure is linked to cancer incidence. However, the mutagenic properties of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde remain incompletely understood, at least in part because they are relatively weak mutagens. Here, we use a highly sensitive yeast genetic reporter system featuring controlled generation of long single-stranded DNA regions to show that both small aldehydes induced mutational patterns characterized by predominantly C/G → A/T, C/G → T/A, and T/A → C/G substitutions, each in similar proportions. We observed an excess of C/G → A/T transversions when compared to mock-treated controls. Many of these C/G → A/T transversions occurred at TC/GA motifs. Interestingly, the formaldehyde mutational pattern resembles single base substitution signature 40 from the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Single base substitution signature 40 is a mutational signature of unknown etiology. We also noted that acetaldehyde treatment caused an excess of deletion events longer than 4 bases while formaldehyde did not. This latter result could be another distinguishing feature between the mutational patterns of these simple aldehydes. These findings shed new light on the characteristics of 2 important, commonly occurring mutagens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书