头痛领域的职业发展障碍:一项基于网络的全球横断面调查。

Irene de Boer, Anna Ambrosini, Rashmi B Halker Singh, Betül Baykan, Dawn C Buse, Cristina Tassoreli, Rigmor H Jensen, Patricia Pozo-Rosich, Gisela M Terwindt
{"title":"头痛领域的职业发展障碍:一项基于网络的全球横断面调查。","authors":"Irene de Boer,&nbsp;Anna Ambrosini,&nbsp;Rashmi B Halker Singh,&nbsp;Betül Baykan,&nbsp;Dawn C Buse,&nbsp;Cristina Tassoreli,&nbsp;Rigmor H Jensen,&nbsp;Patricia Pozo-Rosich,&nbsp;Gisela M Terwindt","doi":"10.1177/03331024221123081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well recognized that underrepresented and minoritized groups do not have the same career opportunities. However, there are limited data on the range and specifics of potential barriers that withhold people in headache medicine and science from reaching their full potential. Moreover, people from different geographical regions often perceive different challenges. We aimed to identify world-wide perceived career barriers and possibilities for promoting equality amongst professionals in the headache fields.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among professionals in the field of headache globally. The questions of the survey were aimed at assessing perceived career barriers in four domains: professional recognition, opportunities in scientific societies, clinical practice, and salary and compensation. Perceived mentorship was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 580 responders completed the survey (55.3% women). Gender was the most important perceived barrier in almost all domains. Additionally, country of birth emerged as an important barrier to participation in international scientific societies. Career barriers varied across world regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential that longstanding and ongoing disparities by gender and country of origin for professionals in the headache field are globally acknowledged and addressed in areas of recruitment, retention, opportunities, mentor- and sponsorships, and advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":195255,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","volume":" ","pages":"1498-1509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/d0/10.1177_03331024221123081.PMC9693724.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Irene de Boer,&nbsp;Anna Ambrosini,&nbsp;Rashmi B Halker Singh,&nbsp;Betül Baykan,&nbsp;Dawn C Buse,&nbsp;Cristina Tassoreli,&nbsp;Rigmor H Jensen,&nbsp;Patricia Pozo-Rosich,&nbsp;Gisela M Terwindt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024221123081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is well recognized that underrepresented and minoritized groups do not have the same career opportunities. However, there are limited data on the range and specifics of potential barriers that withhold people in headache medicine and science from reaching their full potential. Moreover, people from different geographical regions often perceive different challenges. We aimed to identify world-wide perceived career barriers and possibilities for promoting equality amongst professionals in the headache fields.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among professionals in the field of headache globally. The questions of the survey were aimed at assessing perceived career barriers in four domains: professional recognition, opportunities in scientific societies, clinical practice, and salary and compensation. Perceived mentorship was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 580 responders completed the survey (55.3% women). Gender was the most important perceived barrier in almost all domains. Additionally, country of birth emerged as an important barrier to participation in international scientific societies. Career barriers varied across world regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential that longstanding and ongoing disparities by gender and country of origin for professionals in the headache field are globally acknowledged and addressed in areas of recruitment, retention, opportunities, mentor- and sponsorships, and advancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":195255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1498-1509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/d0/10.1177_03331024221123081.PMC9693724.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221123081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221123081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:众所周知,代表性不足和少数群体没有同样的职业机会。然而,关于阻碍人们在头痛医学和科学方面充分发挥潜力的潜在障碍的范围和具体情况的数据有限。此外,来自不同地理区域的人往往会感受到不同的挑战。我们的目的是确定世界范围内公认的职业障碍和促进头痛领域专业人员之间平等的可能性。方法:对全球头痛领域的专业人员进行横断面在线调查。该调查的问题旨在评估四个领域的感知职业障碍:专业认可、科学学会的机会、临床实践、工资和补偿。感知指导也被评估。结果:共有580名应答者完成了调查,其中女性占55.3%。性别是几乎所有领域中最重要的障碍。此外,出生国成为参加国际科学协会的一个重要障碍。世界各地的职业障碍各不相同。结论:在招聘、保留、机会、导师和赞助以及晋升等方面,全球必须承认和解决头痛领域专业人员长期存在的性别和原籍国差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.

Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.

Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.

Perceived barriers to career progression in the headache field: A global web-based cross-sectional survey.

Background: It is well recognized that underrepresented and minoritized groups do not have the same career opportunities. However, there are limited data on the range and specifics of potential barriers that withhold people in headache medicine and science from reaching their full potential. Moreover, people from different geographical regions often perceive different challenges. We aimed to identify world-wide perceived career barriers and possibilities for promoting equality amongst professionals in the headache fields.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among professionals in the field of headache globally. The questions of the survey were aimed at assessing perceived career barriers in four domains: professional recognition, opportunities in scientific societies, clinical practice, and salary and compensation. Perceived mentorship was also assessed.

Results: In total 580 responders completed the survey (55.3% women). Gender was the most important perceived barrier in almost all domains. Additionally, country of birth emerged as an important barrier to participation in international scientific societies. Career barriers varied across world regions.

Conclusion: It is essential that longstanding and ongoing disparities by gender and country of origin for professionals in the headache field are globally acknowledged and addressed in areas of recruitment, retention, opportunities, mentor- and sponsorships, and advancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信