评估利益相关者参与合作研究:共同生产气候适应能力知识。

Socio-ecological practice research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8
Loretta Singletary, Elizabeth Koebele, William Evans, Christopher J Copp, Shelby Hockaday, Jesse Jo Rego
{"title":"评估利益相关者参与合作研究:共同生产气候适应能力知识。","authors":"Loretta Singletary,&nbsp;Elizabeth Koebele,&nbsp;William Evans,&nbsp;Christopher J Copp,&nbsp;Shelby Hockaday,&nbsp;Jesse Jo Rego","doi":"10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse researchers and stakeholders around the topic of enhanced climate resilience. Here, we describe the: (1) need for and development of a CRF as it relates to stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production; (2) implementation of the initial engagement experience, focused around individual semi-structured interviews, in the context of a snow-dependent, arid river basin where historical water over allocation, climate change, and diversified water uses challenge the basin's resilience; and (3) formative evaluation of the engagement experience using an online survey to inform the development of more effective engagement practices. Results of the evaluation indicate that, after participating, most stakeholders understand and recognize the importance of research goals, demonstrate positive attitudes toward collaborative research and researchers, view their contribution of knowledge and expertise as critical to research, and perceive researchers as eager to use their expertise. Moreover, stakeholders emphasized various context-specific goals for knowledge co-production, such as finding innovative ways to adapt to increased competition for diminishing water supplies. To achieve these goals, stakeholders suggested researchers learn about their basin, including its water allocation history and agricultural practices. These results highlight the importance of centering stakeholder engagement experiences within a broader CRF and formatively evaluating such experiences to adapt them to achieve research goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":74830,"journal":{"name":"Socio-ecological practice research","volume":"4 3","pages":"235-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395777/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience.\",\"authors\":\"Loretta Singletary,&nbsp;Elizabeth Koebele,&nbsp;William Evans,&nbsp;Christopher J Copp,&nbsp;Shelby Hockaday,&nbsp;Jesse Jo Rego\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse researchers and stakeholders around the topic of enhanced climate resilience. Here, we describe the: (1) need for and development of a CRF as it relates to stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production; (2) implementation of the initial engagement experience, focused around individual semi-structured interviews, in the context of a snow-dependent, arid river basin where historical water over allocation, climate change, and diversified water uses challenge the basin's resilience; and (3) formative evaluation of the engagement experience using an online survey to inform the development of more effective engagement practices. Results of the evaluation indicate that, after participating, most stakeholders understand and recognize the importance of research goals, demonstrate positive attitudes toward collaborative research and researchers, view their contribution of knowledge and expertise as critical to research, and perceive researchers as eager to use their expertise. Moreover, stakeholders emphasized various context-specific goals for knowledge co-production, such as finding innovative ways to adapt to increased competition for diminishing water supplies. To achieve these goals, stakeholders suggested researchers learn about their basin, including its water allocation history and agricultural practices. These results highlight the importance of centering stakeholder engagement experiences within a broader CRF and formatively evaluating such experiences to adapt them to achieve research goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"235-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-ecological practice research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-ecological practice research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00124-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究描述了旨在促进知识合作生产的初始利益相关者参与体验的开发、实施和评估。参与经验是合作研究框架(CRF)的一部分,该框架促进了不同研究人员和利益相关者之间围绕增强气候适应能力这一主题的反复互动。在这里,我们描述了:(1)对CRF的需求和发展,因为它与利益相关者的参与和知识的共同生产有关;(2)在一个依赖雪的干旱河流流域,在历史水资源过度分配、气候变化和多样化用水挑战流域恢复能力的背景下,实施以个人半结构化访谈为重点的初始参与经验;(3)利用在线调查对参与经验进行形成性评估,为更有效的参与实践的发展提供信息。评估结果表明,在参与后,大多数利益相关者理解并认识到研究目标的重要性,对合作研究和研究人员表现出积极的态度,将他们的知识和专业知识的贡献视为研究的关键,并认为研究人员渴望使用他们的专业知识。此外,利益攸关方强调了知识合作生产的各种具体目标,例如寻找创新方法来适应日益激烈的水资源供应竞争。为了实现这些目标,利益相关者建议研究人员了解他们的流域,包括其水资源分配历史和农业实践。这些结果强调了将利益相关者参与经验集中在更广泛的CRF中的重要性,并对这些经验进行形成性评估,以使其适应研究目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience.

Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience.

Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience.

Evaluating stakeholder engagement in collaborative research: co-producing knowledge for climate resilience.

This study describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of an initial stakeholder engagement experience designed to facilitate knowledge co-production. The engagement experience is part of a collaborative research framework (CRF), which facilitates iterative interactions among diverse researchers and stakeholders around the topic of enhanced climate resilience. Here, we describe the: (1) need for and development of a CRF as it relates to stakeholder engagement and knowledge co-production; (2) implementation of the initial engagement experience, focused around individual semi-structured interviews, in the context of a snow-dependent, arid river basin where historical water over allocation, climate change, and diversified water uses challenge the basin's resilience; and (3) formative evaluation of the engagement experience using an online survey to inform the development of more effective engagement practices. Results of the evaluation indicate that, after participating, most stakeholders understand and recognize the importance of research goals, demonstrate positive attitudes toward collaborative research and researchers, view their contribution of knowledge and expertise as critical to research, and perceive researchers as eager to use their expertise. Moreover, stakeholders emphasized various context-specific goals for knowledge co-production, such as finding innovative ways to adapt to increased competition for diminishing water supplies. To achieve these goals, stakeholders suggested researchers learn about their basin, including its water allocation history and agricultural practices. These results highlight the importance of centering stakeholder engagement experiences within a broader CRF and formatively evaluating such experiences to adapt them to achieve research goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信