牙周炎和种植周炎的微生物特征:系统综述。

Q3 Dentistry
Arvina Rajasekar, Sheeja S Varghese
{"title":"牙周炎和种植周炎的微生物特征:系统综述。","authors":"Arvina Rajasekar,&nbsp;Sheeja S Varghese","doi":"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022043121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the microbiological makeup of peri-implant biofilm could contribute to the discovery of focused treatment strategies, improving the outcome of peri-implantitis management. However, the bacterial profile in diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci is still unclear. This systematic review aims to analyze the microbiological similarities and differences between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci based on the available literature evidence. A thorough search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, as well as a manual search employing the eligibility criteria. After a thorough review, studies evaluating the microbial composition acquired from plaque samples obtained from patients with diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were chosen. The selected 8 studies evaluated the differences in microbial profile in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Five studies found a statistically significant variation in the microbial profile between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci, while in one study, no changes in the microbiology of inflammatory peri-implant and periodontal sites were observed. In one of the two in situ studies, the structure of the transcription level and core species was different in peri-implantitis, whereas the other in situ study found that the 16S rRNA-based bacterial profile of both the diseases were different, while the functional genes, taxonomic, and virulence factor mRNA profiles were identical. According to existing studies, significant differences in the biofilm composition of diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were observed. Therefore, periodontitis and peri-implantitis have diverse microbial characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","volume":"32 4","pages":"83-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological Profile in Periodontitis and Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Arvina Rajasekar,&nbsp;Sheeja S Varghese\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022043121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the microbiological makeup of peri-implant biofilm could contribute to the discovery of focused treatment strategies, improving the outcome of peri-implantitis management. However, the bacterial profile in diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci is still unclear. This systematic review aims to analyze the microbiological similarities and differences between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci based on the available literature evidence. A thorough search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, as well as a manual search employing the eligibility criteria. After a thorough review, studies evaluating the microbial composition acquired from plaque samples obtained from patients with diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were chosen. The selected 8 studies evaluated the differences in microbial profile in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Five studies found a statistically significant variation in the microbial profile between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci, while in one study, no changes in the microbiology of inflammatory peri-implant and periodontal sites were observed. In one of the two in situ studies, the structure of the transcription level and core species was different in peri-implantitis, whereas the other in situ study found that the 16S rRNA-based bacterial profile of both the diseases were different, while the functional genes, taxonomic, and virulence factor mRNA profiles were identical. According to existing studies, significant differences in the biofilm composition of diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were observed. Therefore, periodontitis and peri-implantitis have diverse microbial characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"83-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022043121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term effects of medical implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022043121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

了解种植体周围生物膜的微生物组成有助于发现有针对性的治疗策略,提高种植体周围炎的治疗效果。然而,在患病的牙周和种植体周围沟的细菌分布仍不清楚。本系统综述的目的是在现有文献的基础上,分析患病牙周沟与种植周沟之间微生物学的异同。在PubMed、Google Scholar和Cochrane等电子数据库中进行了彻底的搜索,以及采用合格标准的人工搜索。经过全面的回顾,我们选择了从患病的牙周和种植周周沟患者的牙菌斑样本中获得微生物组成的研究。所选的8项研究评估了牙周炎和种植周炎中微生物谱的差异。五项研究发现,患病牙周和种植周沟之间的微生物特征有统计学意义上的差异,而一项研究发现,炎症性种植周和牙周部位的微生物特征没有变化。在其中一项原位研究中,植体周围炎的转录水平和核心物种结构不同,而另一项原位研究发现,这两种疾病的基于16S rrna的细菌谱不同,而功能基因、分类和毒力因子mRNA谱相同。根据已有的研究,病变牙周和种植周沟的生物膜组成有显著差异。因此,牙周炎和种植周炎具有不同的微生物特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microbiological Profile in Periodontitis and Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review.

Understanding the microbiological makeup of peri-implant biofilm could contribute to the discovery of focused treatment strategies, improving the outcome of peri-implantitis management. However, the bacterial profile in diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci is still unclear. This systematic review aims to analyze the microbiological similarities and differences between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci based on the available literature evidence. A thorough search was conducted in electronic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, as well as a manual search employing the eligibility criteria. After a thorough review, studies evaluating the microbial composition acquired from plaque samples obtained from patients with diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were chosen. The selected 8 studies evaluated the differences in microbial profile in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. Five studies found a statistically significant variation in the microbial profile between diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci, while in one study, no changes in the microbiology of inflammatory peri-implant and periodontal sites were observed. In one of the two in situ studies, the structure of the transcription level and core species was different in peri-implantitis, whereas the other in situ study found that the 16S rRNA-based bacterial profile of both the diseases were different, while the functional genes, taxonomic, and virulence factor mRNA profiles were identical. According to existing studies, significant differences in the biofilm composition of diseased periodontal and peri-implant sulci were observed. Therefore, periodontitis and peri-implantitis have diverse microbial characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: MEDICAL IMPLANTS are being used in every organ of the human body. Ideally, medical implants must have biomechanical properties comparable to those of autogenous tissues without any adverse effects. In each anatomic site, studies of the long-term effects of medical implants must be undertaken to determine accurately the safety and performance of the implants. Today, implant surgery has become an interdisciplinary undertaking involving a number of skilled and gifted specialists. For example, successful cochlear implants will involve audiologists, audiological physicians, speech and language therapists, otolaryngologists, nurses, neuro-otologists, teachers of the deaf, hearing therapists, cochlear implant manufacturers, and others involved with hearing-impaired and deaf individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信