母参和氯己定对粪肠杆菌和白色念珠菌的微生物学评价。

Hena Rahman, Anil Chandra
{"title":"母参和氯己定对粪肠杆菌和白色念珠菌的微生物学评价。","authors":"Hena Rahman,&nbsp;Anil Chandra","doi":"10.4103/0975-962X.155876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of Matricaria chamomilla and Chlorhexidine gel against Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 15%, 25% Matricaria chamomilla in aq. base and 2% chlorhexidine gel against C. albicans (ATCC 24433) and E. faecalis (ATCC 24212) strains. Vancomycin was used as the positive control for E. faecalis and fluconazole for C. albicans . The agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h after which the zone of inhibition were measured separately for each material. Data thus obtained were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-order test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2% chlorhexidine showed maximum inhibitory zone for C. albicans (33.26 mm) and E. faecalis (24.54 mm). 25% Matricaria showed zones of 24.16 mm and 20.62 mm for C. albicans and E. faecalis, respectively. 15% Matricaria did not show any antimicrobial activity (0 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current in vitro study suggest that 25% Matricaria can be used as an antimicrobial agent, but it is less effective than 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel against C. albicans and E. faecalis. Matricaria at a lesser concentration of 15% aq. base is ineffective against both the microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":90526,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of dentistry","volume":"6 2","pages":"60-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/6a/IJDENT-6-60.PMC4455156.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiologic Evaluation of Matricaria and Chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans.\",\"authors\":\"Hena Rahman,&nbsp;Anil Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/0975-962X.155876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of Matricaria chamomilla and Chlorhexidine gel against Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 15%, 25% Matricaria chamomilla in aq. base and 2% chlorhexidine gel against C. albicans (ATCC 24433) and E. faecalis (ATCC 24212) strains. Vancomycin was used as the positive control for E. faecalis and fluconazole for C. albicans . The agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h after which the zone of inhibition were measured separately for each material. Data thus obtained were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-order test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2% chlorhexidine showed maximum inhibitory zone for C. albicans (33.26 mm) and E. faecalis (24.54 mm). 25% Matricaria showed zones of 24.16 mm and 20.62 mm for C. albicans and E. faecalis, respectively. 15% Matricaria did not show any antimicrobial activity (0 mm).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current in vitro study suggest that 25% Matricaria can be used as an antimicrobial agent, but it is less effective than 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel against C. albicans and E. faecalis. Matricaria at a lesser concentration of 15% aq. base is ineffective against both the microorganisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"60-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5f/6a/IJDENT-6-60.PMC4455156.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.155876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.155876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:评价不同浓度洋甘菊和氯己定凝胶对白色念珠菌和粪肠球菌的抑菌活性。材料与方法:采用琼脂扩散法测定15%、25%洋甘菊和2%氯己定凝胶对白色念珠菌(ATCC 24433)和粪肠杆菌(ATCC 24212)的抑菌活性。以万古霉素为阳性对照,白色念珠菌为氟康唑。琼脂板37℃孵育48 h后,分别测定每种材料的抑制区。所得数据采用Wilcoxon秩序检验进行统计分析。结果:2%氯己定对白色念珠菌(33.26 mm)和粪肠杆菌(24.54 mm)的抑制范围最大;25%母株白色念珠菌带24.16 mm,粪便念珠菌带20.62 mm;15%的苦参无抗菌活性(0 mm)。结论:目前体外实验结果表明,25%麻属菌可作为抗菌药物,但其对白色念珠菌和粪肠杆菌的抑菌效果不如2%葡萄糖酸氯己定凝胶。在较低的浓度下,15%的碱对这两种微生物都无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microbiologic Evaluation of Matricaria and Chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans.

Microbiologic Evaluation of Matricaria and Chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans.

Microbiologic Evaluation of Matricaria and Chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans.

Microbiologic Evaluation of Matricaria and Chlorhexidine against E. faecalis and C. albicans.

Objective: To evaluate the antimicrobial activity of different concentrations of Matricaria chamomilla and Chlorhexidine gel against Candida albicans and Enterococcus faecalis.

Materials and methods: The agar diffusion test was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of 15%, 25% Matricaria chamomilla in aq. base and 2% chlorhexidine gel against C. albicans (ATCC 24433) and E. faecalis (ATCC 24212) strains. Vancomycin was used as the positive control for E. faecalis and fluconazole for C. albicans . The agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h after which the zone of inhibition were measured separately for each material. Data thus obtained were statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank-order test.

Results: 2% chlorhexidine showed maximum inhibitory zone for C. albicans (33.26 mm) and E. faecalis (24.54 mm). 25% Matricaria showed zones of 24.16 mm and 20.62 mm for C. albicans and E. faecalis, respectively. 15% Matricaria did not show any antimicrobial activity (0 mm).

Conclusion: The results of the current in vitro study suggest that 25% Matricaria can be used as an antimicrobial agent, but it is less effective than 2% chlorhexidine gluconate gel against C. albicans and E. faecalis. Matricaria at a lesser concentration of 15% aq. base is ineffective against both the microorganisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信