使用多信息保真度数据来确定中立的儿童福利促进者对永久性决策团队的影响。

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Child Welfare Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Elizabeth J Greeno, Kantahyanee Murray, Berenice Rushovich
{"title":"使用多信息保真度数据来确定中立的儿童福利促进者对永久性决策团队的影响。","authors":"Elizabeth J Greeno,&nbsp;Kantahyanee Murray,&nbsp;Berenice Rushovich","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few studies have included fidelity monitoring and critical approaches to the evaluation of family decision meetings. The current study uses a mixed-methods approach to examine the implementation and fidelity adherence of one state's family decision meeting model. Main findings indicate that while individuals facilitating the meetings perceive their fidelity to the model is strong, the observation data suggest that model adherence is inconsistent among those facilitating the meetings. Practice implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9796,"journal":{"name":"Child Welfare","volume":"92 6","pages":"111-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using multi-informed fidelity data to determine the impact of a neutral child welfare facilitator for permanency decision teams.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J Greeno,&nbsp;Kantahyanee Murray,&nbsp;Berenice Rushovich\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Few studies have included fidelity monitoring and critical approaches to the evaluation of family decision meetings. The current study uses a mixed-methods approach to examine the implementation and fidelity adherence of one state's family decision meeting model. Main findings indicate that while individuals facilitating the meetings perceive their fidelity to the model is strong, the observation data suggest that model adherence is inconsistent among those facilitating the meetings. Practice implications are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Welfare\",\"volume\":\"92 6\",\"pages\":\"111-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

很少有研究将保真度监测和评估家庭决策会议的关键方法纳入其中。目前的研究使用混合方法的方法来检查一个国家的家庭决策会议模型的实施和保真度遵守。主要研究结果表明,虽然会议促进个体认为他们对模型的忠诚程度很高,但观察数据表明,会议促进个体对模型的依从性并不一致。讨论了实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using multi-informed fidelity data to determine the impact of a neutral child welfare facilitator for permanency decision teams.

Few studies have included fidelity monitoring and critical approaches to the evaluation of family decision meetings. The current study uses a mixed-methods approach to examine the implementation and fidelity adherence of one state's family decision meeting model. Main findings indicate that while individuals facilitating the meetings perceive their fidelity to the model is strong, the observation data suggest that model adherence is inconsistent among those facilitating the meetings. Practice implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Welfare
Child Welfare Multiple-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信