[卧床时疼痛耐受阈值和体液免疫因子的动态变化]。

Q3 Medicine
O Yu Polyvyanaya, A I Levashova, V S Morozova, S N Petrochenko, M A Myagkova, I A Moseykin
{"title":"[卧床时疼痛耐受阈值和体液免疫因子的动态变化]。","authors":"O Yu Polyvyanaya,&nbsp;A I Levashova,&nbsp;V S Morozova,&nbsp;S N Petrochenko,&nbsp;M A Myagkova,&nbsp;I A Moseykin","doi":"10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to study the possible markers of pain syndrome--indicators of pain sensitivity--pain pressure tolerance thresholds (PPTT), and immuno-indicators--natural antibodies against pain processing mediators (eAb) for evaluation the possibility of its using for a objective pain assessment at chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pain sensitivity was assessed daily and nightly, by measuring the PPTT The natural antibody levels (eAb), were determined in serum by ELISA. Measurement of all parameters were performed at 1st, 10th and 21 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 patients (93 women and 80 men) with chronic low back pain were included in the study. At 1st day most patients had lowered PPTT: 55% of men and 74% during the day, 72% of men and 89% of women at night. Dynamic study has shown a tendency of PPTT normalization in men. The study of diurnal PPTT variations have shown that night PPTT lower than day PPTT on 15-17%. We found gender PPTT differences: PPTT values in women 17-26% lower than in men. Analysis of individual eAb profiles has showed that elevated and high levels of eAb to β-endorphin, orphanin and histamine have 84%, 78%, 84% women and 82%, 85 and 95% men, respectively. These indicators higher than those for serotonin, dopamine and angiotensin (55%, 65%, 70% in women and 65%, 66%, 66% in men, respectively; p < 0.05). Dynamic study of eAb levels have shown a significant anti-histamine eAbs decrease (23%; p = 0.015) only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pathological changes in pain sensitivity and levels of eAbs to pain-processing mediatos are evidenced. Further investigations are necessary to clarify to role of these variations in pain processing and for use these indicators for objective pain assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39355,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk","volume":" 1","pages":"118-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Dynamics of pain tolerance thresholds and humoral immunity factors at dorsalgy].\",\"authors\":\"O Yu Polyvyanaya,&nbsp;A I Levashova,&nbsp;V S Morozova,&nbsp;S N Petrochenko,&nbsp;M A Myagkova,&nbsp;I A Moseykin\",\"doi\":\"10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to study the possible markers of pain syndrome--indicators of pain sensitivity--pain pressure tolerance thresholds (PPTT), and immuno-indicators--natural antibodies against pain processing mediators (eAb) for evaluation the possibility of its using for a objective pain assessment at chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pain sensitivity was assessed daily and nightly, by measuring the PPTT The natural antibody levels (eAb), were determined in serum by ELISA. Measurement of all parameters were performed at 1st, 10th and 21 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 patients (93 women and 80 men) with chronic low back pain were included in the study. At 1st day most patients had lowered PPTT: 55% of men and 74% during the day, 72% of men and 89% of women at night. Dynamic study has shown a tendency of PPTT normalization in men. The study of diurnal PPTT variations have shown that night PPTT lower than day PPTT on 15-17%. We found gender PPTT differences: PPTT values in women 17-26% lower than in men. Analysis of individual eAb profiles has showed that elevated and high levels of eAb to β-endorphin, orphanin and histamine have 84%, 78%, 84% women and 82%, 85 and 95% men, respectively. These indicators higher than those for serotonin, dopamine and angiotensin (55%, 65%, 70% in women and 65%, 66%, 66% in men, respectively; p < 0.05). Dynamic study of eAb levels have shown a significant anti-histamine eAbs decrease (23%; p = 0.015) only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pathological changes in pain sensitivity and levels of eAbs to pain-processing mediatos are evidenced. Further investigations are necessary to clarify to role of these variations in pain processing and for use these indicators for objective pain assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"118-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Rossiiskoi Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn.v70i1.1241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是研究疼痛综合征的可能标志-疼痛敏感性指标-疼痛压力耐受阈值(PPTT)和免疫指标-针对疼痛加工介质(eAb)的天然抗体,以评估其用于慢性腰痛客观疼痛评估的可能性。方法:采用PPTT法测定大鼠每日和夜间的疼痛敏感性,ELISA法测定血清中天然抗体(eAb)水平。第1天、第10天和第21天进行各项参数测定。结果:173例慢性腰痛患者(女性93例,男性80例)纳入研究。在第一天,大多数患者的PPTT降低:55%的男性和74%的人在白天,72%的男性和89%的女性在晚上。动态研究显示男性PPTT有正常化的趋势。对PPTT日变化的研究表明,夜间PPTT比白天低15-17%。我们发现了PPTT的性别差异:女性的PPTT值比男性低17-26%。对个体eAb谱的分析显示,β-内啡肽、孤啡肽和组胺的eAb升高和高水平在女性中分别占84%、78%和84%,在男性中分别占82%、85%和95%。这些指标高于血清素、多巴胺和血管紧张素(女性分别为55%、65%、70%和男性分别为65%、66%、66%);P < 0.05)。eAb水平的动态研究显示抗组胺eAb显著下降(23%;P = 0.015)。结论:eAbs对疼痛加工介质的疼痛敏感性和水平发生了病理改变。进一步的研究需要澄清这些变化在疼痛处理中的作用,并使用这些指标进行客观的疼痛评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Dynamics of pain tolerance thresholds and humoral immunity factors at dorsalgy].

Objective: Our aim was to study the possible markers of pain syndrome--indicators of pain sensitivity--pain pressure tolerance thresholds (PPTT), and immuno-indicators--natural antibodies against pain processing mediators (eAb) for evaluation the possibility of its using for a objective pain assessment at chronic low back pain.

Methods: Pain sensitivity was assessed daily and nightly, by measuring the PPTT The natural antibody levels (eAb), were determined in serum by ELISA. Measurement of all parameters were performed at 1st, 10th and 21 days.

Results: 173 patients (93 women and 80 men) with chronic low back pain were included in the study. At 1st day most patients had lowered PPTT: 55% of men and 74% during the day, 72% of men and 89% of women at night. Dynamic study has shown a tendency of PPTT normalization in men. The study of diurnal PPTT variations have shown that night PPTT lower than day PPTT on 15-17%. We found gender PPTT differences: PPTT values in women 17-26% lower than in men. Analysis of individual eAb profiles has showed that elevated and high levels of eAb to β-endorphin, orphanin and histamine have 84%, 78%, 84% women and 82%, 85 and 95% men, respectively. These indicators higher than those for serotonin, dopamine and angiotensin (55%, 65%, 70% in women and 65%, 66%, 66% in men, respectively; p < 0.05). Dynamic study of eAb levels have shown a significant anti-histamine eAbs decrease (23%; p = 0.015) only.

Conclusion: The pathological changes in pain sensitivity and levels of eAbs to pain-processing mediatos are evidenced. Further investigations are necessary to clarify to role of these variations in pain processing and for use these indicators for objective pain assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信