当使用Kolb学习风格评估工具进行评估时,急诊医学住院医师和教师是否有相似的学习风格?

Delaware medical journal Pub Date : 2015-04-01
Jenna Fredette, Corinne O'Brien, Christy Poole, Jason Nomura
{"title":"当使用Kolb学习风格评估工具进行评估时,急诊医学住院医师和教师是否有相似的学习风格?","authors":"Jenna Fredette,&nbsp;Corinne O'Brien,&nbsp;Christy Poole,&nbsp;Jason Nomura","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experiential learning theory and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (Kolb LSI) have influenced educators worldwide for decades. Knowledge of learning styles can create efficient learning environments, increase information retention, and improve learner satisfaction. Learning styles have been examined in medicine previously, but not specifically with Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and attendings. Using the Kolb LSI, the learning styles of Emergency Medicine residents and attendings were assessed. The findings showed that the majority of EM residents and attendings shared the accommodating learning style. This result was different than prior studies that found the majority of medical professionals had a converging learning style and other studies that found attendings often have different learning styles than residents. The issue of learning styles among emergency medical residents and attendings is important because learning style knowledge may have an impact on how a residency program structures curriculum and how EM residents are successfully, efficiently, and creatively educated.</p>","PeriodicalId":75779,"journal":{"name":"Delaware medical journal","volume":"87 4","pages":"109-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do emergency medicine residents and faculty have similar learning styles when assessed with the Kolb learning style assessment tool?\",\"authors\":\"Jenna Fredette,&nbsp;Corinne O'Brien,&nbsp;Christy Poole,&nbsp;Jason Nomura\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Experiential learning theory and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (Kolb LSI) have influenced educators worldwide for decades. Knowledge of learning styles can create efficient learning environments, increase information retention, and improve learner satisfaction. Learning styles have been examined in medicine previously, but not specifically with Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and attendings. Using the Kolb LSI, the learning styles of Emergency Medicine residents and attendings were assessed. The findings showed that the majority of EM residents and attendings shared the accommodating learning style. This result was different than prior studies that found the majority of medical professionals had a converging learning style and other studies that found attendings often have different learning styles than residents. The issue of learning styles among emergency medical residents and attendings is important because learning style knowledge may have an impact on how a residency program structures curriculum and how EM residents are successfully, efficiently, and creatively educated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"109-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,体验式学习理论和科尔布学习风格量表(科尔布LSI)一直影响着全世界的教育工作者。学习风格的知识可以创造高效的学习环境,增加信息保留,提高学习者满意度。学习风格已经在医学上进行了检查,但不是专门针对急诊医学(EM)住院医生和主治医生。采用Kolb LSI评估急诊科住院医师与主治医师的学习风格。调查结果显示,大部份新兴市场住院医生及主治医生均采用融通式学习方式。这一结果与之前的研究不同,之前的研究发现,大多数医疗专业人员具有趋同的学习风格,而其他研究发现,主治医生的学习风格往往与住院医生不同。急诊住院医师和主治医师的学习风格问题很重要,因为学习风格知识可能会影响住院医师计划如何构建课程,以及急诊住院医师如何成功、有效和创造性地接受教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do emergency medicine residents and faculty have similar learning styles when assessed with the Kolb learning style assessment tool?

Experiential learning theory and the Kolb Learning Style Inventory (Kolb LSI) have influenced educators worldwide for decades. Knowledge of learning styles can create efficient learning environments, increase information retention, and improve learner satisfaction. Learning styles have been examined in medicine previously, but not specifically with Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and attendings. Using the Kolb LSI, the learning styles of Emergency Medicine residents and attendings were assessed. The findings showed that the majority of EM residents and attendings shared the accommodating learning style. This result was different than prior studies that found the majority of medical professionals had a converging learning style and other studies that found attendings often have different learning styles than residents. The issue of learning styles among emergency medical residents and attendings is important because learning style knowledge may have an impact on how a residency program structures curriculum and how EM residents are successfully, efficiently, and creatively educated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信