{"title":"I型,II型,偶尔还有III型:我们怎么可能出错?","authors":"Mitchell Maltenfort","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An important part of planning a study is deciding what risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is acceptable. Type I error occurs when a study draws a false-positive conclusion. A false negative, not appreciating a difference when one exists, is known as type II error. This article reviews the difference between the 2 common types of error and discusses conventions used to set acceptable error levels. </p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 5","pages":"189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Type I, Type II, and Occasionally Type III: How Can We Go Wrong?\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Maltenfort\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An important part of planning a study is deciding what risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is acceptable. Type I error occurs when a study draws a false-positive conclusion. A false negative, not appreciating a difference when one exists, is known as type II error. This article reviews the difference between the 2 common types of error and discusses conventions used to set acceptable error levels. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Type I, Type II, and Occasionally Type III: How Can We Go Wrong?
An important part of planning a study is deciding what risk of drawing incorrect conclusions is acceptable. Type I error occurs when a study draws a false-positive conclusion. A false negative, not appreciating a difference when one exists, is known as type II error. This article reviews the difference between the 2 common types of error and discusses conventions used to set acceptable error levels.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.