{"title":"单切口腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的价值:系统文献综述。","authors":"Cong-Chao Ma, Ping Li, Liu-Hua Wang, Zhao-Yun Xia, Sheng-Wen Wu, Shao-Jun Wang, Chun-Ming Lu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recently, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colorectal malignancy is rapidly becoming the central issue for explorers of minimally invasive surgery worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the safety and efficacy of SILC for colorectal malignancy when implemented by experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>PubMed, WHO international trial register and Embase were searched for publications concerning SILC and MLC from 2000 to 2013, with the last search on September 10, 2013. Only pure single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery for malignant disease was included. Primary outcomes were the early postoperative complication profiles of SILC. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation time, blood loss, lymph node yields, conversion rate, distal margin of the resected tumor, and duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC), SILC has less postoperative complication and bleeding. The conversion, the median lymph node retrieval, proximal margin of the resected tumor and distal margin of the resected tumor for malignant disease achieved with SILC was acceptable. There was no significant reduction in length of hospital stay with SILC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILC is a technically reliable and realistic approach with short-term results similar to those obtained with the MLC procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 137","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Cong-Chao Ma, Ping Li, Liu-Hua Wang, Zhao-Yun Xia, Sheng-Wen Wu, Shao-Jun Wang, Chun-Ming Lu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Recently, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colorectal malignancy is rapidly becoming the central issue for explorers of minimally invasive surgery worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the safety and efficacy of SILC for colorectal malignancy when implemented by experienced surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>PubMed, WHO international trial register and Embase were searched for publications concerning SILC and MLC from 2000 to 2013, with the last search on September 10, 2013. Only pure single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery for malignant disease was included. Primary outcomes were the early postoperative complication profiles of SILC. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation time, blood loss, lymph node yields, conversion rate, distal margin of the resected tumor, and duration of hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies involving 547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC), SILC has less postoperative complication and bleeding. The conversion, the median lymph node retrieval, proximal margin of the resected tumor and distal margin of the resected tumor for malignant disease achieved with SILC was acceptable. There was no significant reduction in length of hospital stay with SILC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SILC is a technically reliable and realistic approach with short-term results similar to those obtained with the MLC procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepato-gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"62 137\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepato-gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:近年来,单切口腹腔镜结肠切除术(SILC)治疗结直肠恶性肿瘤正迅速成为世界范围内微创手术探索者的中心问题。本系统综述的目的是建立由经验丰富的外科医生实施SILC治疗结直肠恶性肿瘤的安全性和有效性。方法:检索PubMed、WHO international trial register和Embase,检索2000 - 2013年SILC和MLC相关文献,最后一次检索时间为2013年9月10日。仅包括恶性疾病的纯单切口腹腔镜结肠手术。主要结局是SILC术后早期并发症概况。次要结果为手术时间、出血量、淋巴结数量、转换率、切除肿瘤远端边缘和住院时间。结果:8项研究547例患者符合纳入标准。与多口腹腔镜结肠切除术(MLC)相比,SILC术后并发症和出血较少。对于恶性肿瘤,SILC的转换、正中淋巴结回收、切除肿瘤的近端边缘和远端边缘都是可以接受的。SILC患者的住院时间没有显著减少。结论:SILC是一种技术上可靠和现实的方法,其短期效果与MLC手术相似。
The value of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review.
Background/aims: Recently, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) for colorectal malignancy is rapidly becoming the central issue for explorers of minimally invasive surgery worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to establish the safety and efficacy of SILC for colorectal malignancy when implemented by experienced surgeons.
Methodology: PubMed, WHO international trial register and Embase were searched for publications concerning SILC and MLC from 2000 to 2013, with the last search on September 10, 2013. Only pure single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery for malignant disease was included. Primary outcomes were the early postoperative complication profiles of SILC. Secondary outcomes were duration of operation time, blood loss, lymph node yields, conversion rate, distal margin of the resected tumor, and duration of hospital stay.
Results: Eight studies involving 547 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC), SILC has less postoperative complication and bleeding. The conversion, the median lymph node retrieval, proximal margin of the resected tumor and distal margin of the resected tumor for malignant disease achieved with SILC was acceptable. There was no significant reduction in length of hospital stay with SILC.
Conclusion: SILC is a technically reliable and realistic approach with short-term results similar to those obtained with the MLC procedure.