{"title":"保守治疗和经皮导管引流可改善坏死性胰腺炎的预后。","authors":"Junjun Sun, Cheng Yang, Weifeng Liu, Yanhui Yang, Shifang Qi, Zhijie Chu, Shiyong Xin, Xiaohui Zhang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects of the maximum conservative treatment algorithm with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) as the first choice for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospectively analyzed NP patients who had fine needle aspiration (FNA) for proven infection of necrosis which was considered an indication for surgery (n=22, group 1) compared to patients subjected to maximum conservative treatment with PCD in NP patients (n=30, group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On admission, most baseline data did not show any statistical difference between the two groups, In group 2, all patients were implemented maximum conservative treatment, 25 of 30 patients were cured by PCD (83.3%), open necrosectomy were needed for 3 patients (10.0%) and 2 dead during hospitalization (6.7%). Whereas, in group 1, surgical operation rate was 45.6% and hospital mortality 31.8%, both of the ratios differed significantly compared with group 2 (45.6% vs. 10%, P=0.004; 31.8% vs. 6.7%, P=0.046 respectively). Furthemore, Hospital stay were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (90±18.5 vs. 39±13.4; P=0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A conservative approach with PCD as the first choice to treatment NP might decrease the rate of surgical operation and mortality, and improve the outcome of NP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 137","pages":"195-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative treatment and percutaneous catheter drainage improve outcome of necrotizing pancreatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Junjun Sun, Cheng Yang, Weifeng Liu, Yanhui Yang, Shifang Qi, Zhijie Chu, Shiyong Xin, Xiaohui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects of the maximum conservative treatment algorithm with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) as the first choice for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Retrospectively analyzed NP patients who had fine needle aspiration (FNA) for proven infection of necrosis which was considered an indication for surgery (n=22, group 1) compared to patients subjected to maximum conservative treatment with PCD in NP patients (n=30, group 2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On admission, most baseline data did not show any statistical difference between the two groups, In group 2, all patients were implemented maximum conservative treatment, 25 of 30 patients were cured by PCD (83.3%), open necrosectomy were needed for 3 patients (10.0%) and 2 dead during hospitalization (6.7%). Whereas, in group 1, surgical operation rate was 45.6% and hospital mortality 31.8%, both of the ratios differed significantly compared with group 2 (45.6% vs. 10%, P=0.004; 31.8% vs. 6.7%, P=0.046 respectively). Furthemore, Hospital stay were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (90±18.5 vs. 39±13.4; P=0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A conservative approach with PCD as the first choice to treatment NP might decrease the rate of surgical operation and mortality, and improve the outcome of NP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepato-gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"62 137\",\"pages\":\"195-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepato-gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景/目的:探讨经皮导管引流(PCD)作为坏死性胰腺炎(NP)首选的最大保守治疗方案的临床效果。方法:回顾性分析经细针穿刺(FNA)证实有坏死感染的NP患者(n=22,组1)与接受PCD最大保守治疗的NP患者(n=30,组2)的比较。入院时,两组大部分基线数据无统计学差异。2组30例患者均实施最大保守治疗,PCD治愈25例(83.3%),需行开放性坏死切除术3例(10.0%),住院期间死亡2例(6.7%)。组1手术开手术率为45.6%,住院死亡率为31.8%,与组2比较差异有统计学意义(45.6% vs. 10%, P=0.004;31.8% vs. 6.7%, P=0.046)。此外,组1的住院时间明显高于组2(90±18.5∶39±13.4;P = 0.033)。结论:首选PCD保守治疗NP可降低手术率和死亡率,改善NP预后。
Conservative treatment and percutaneous catheter drainage improve outcome of necrotizing pancreatitis.
Background/aims: To investigate the clinical effects of the maximum conservative treatment algorithm with percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) as the first choice for necrotizing pancreatitis (NP).
Methodology: Retrospectively analyzed NP patients who had fine needle aspiration (FNA) for proven infection of necrosis which was considered an indication for surgery (n=22, group 1) compared to patients subjected to maximum conservative treatment with PCD in NP patients (n=30, group 2).
Results: On admission, most baseline data did not show any statistical difference between the two groups, In group 2, all patients were implemented maximum conservative treatment, 25 of 30 patients were cured by PCD (83.3%), open necrosectomy were needed for 3 patients (10.0%) and 2 dead during hospitalization (6.7%). Whereas, in group 1, surgical operation rate was 45.6% and hospital mortality 31.8%, both of the ratios differed significantly compared with group 2 (45.6% vs. 10%, P=0.004; 31.8% vs. 6.7%, P=0.046 respectively). Furthemore, Hospital stay were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (90±18.5 vs. 39±13.4; P=0.033).
Conclusions: A conservative approach with PCD as the first choice to treatment NP might decrease the rate of surgical operation and mortality, and improve the outcome of NP.