面罩与固定舌器治疗成长期上颌缺损的短期疗效——随机临床试验。

Rahman Showkatbakhsh, Abdolreza Jamilian, Mohammad Behnaz, Mehrangiz Ghassemi, Alireza Ghassemi
{"title":"面罩与固定舌器治疗成长期上颌缺损的短期疗效——随机临床试验。","authors":"Rahman Showkatbakhsh,&nbsp;Abdolreza Jamilian,&nbsp;Mohammad Behnaz,&nbsp;Mehrangiz Ghassemi,&nbsp;Alireza Ghassemi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this single blind, prospective, parallel randomized trial study was to compare the effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance in treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency in growing patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>88 patients with maxillary deficiency were selected. 60 fulfilled the study requirements. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups by computer generated tables. One group was treated with removable face mask and the other group was treated by fixed tongue appliance. 4 of the patients dropped out of study leaving a final number of 56 patients. Thus, the face mask group included 30 patients (13 males, 17 females) with the mean age of 8.5 (SD 1.4) years and the fixed tongue appliance group included 26 patients (13 males, 13 females) with the mean age of 8.9 (SD 1.7) years. The patients Lateral cephalograms obtained at the beginning and end of the study were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired t-tests showed that SNA increased by 1.3° (SD 1.1°) in face mask group (P<0.001) and it increased by 1.8° (SD 0.9°) in fixed tongue appliance group (P<0.001). T-test showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups except for SNB. IMPA decreased significantly in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both treatment modalities were successful in moving the maxilla forward and improving the profile of the patients; however, the bulky size of face masks might reduce patients' compliance and make them less favorite choice of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":83748,"journal":{"name":"International journal of orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.)","volume":"26 1","pages":"33-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The short-term effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance on maxillary deficiency in growing patients--a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Rahman Showkatbakhsh,&nbsp;Abdolreza Jamilian,&nbsp;Mohammad Behnaz,&nbsp;Mehrangiz Ghassemi,&nbsp;Alireza Ghassemi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this single blind, prospective, parallel randomized trial study was to compare the effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance in treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency in growing patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>88 patients with maxillary deficiency were selected. 60 fulfilled the study requirements. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups by computer generated tables. One group was treated with removable face mask and the other group was treated by fixed tongue appliance. 4 of the patients dropped out of study leaving a final number of 56 patients. Thus, the face mask group included 30 patients (13 males, 17 females) with the mean age of 8.5 (SD 1.4) years and the fixed tongue appliance group included 26 patients (13 males, 13 females) with the mean age of 8.9 (SD 1.7) years. The patients Lateral cephalograms obtained at the beginning and end of the study were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired t-tests showed that SNA increased by 1.3° (SD 1.1°) in face mask group (P<0.001) and it increased by 1.8° (SD 0.9°) in fixed tongue appliance group (P<0.001). T-test showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups except for SNB. IMPA decreased significantly in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both treatment modalities were successful in moving the maxilla forward and improving the profile of the patients; however, the bulky size of face masks might reduce patients' compliance and make them less favorite choice of treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"33-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of orthodontics (Milwaukee, Wis.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究是一项单盲、前瞻性、平行随机试验研究,目的是比较面罩和固定舌矫治器治疗成长期上颌缺陷III类错颌畸形的效果。方法:对88例上颌缺陷患者进行分析。60人符合学习要求。采用计算机生成表法将患者随机分为两组。一组采用活动面罩治疗,另一组采用固定矫治器治疗。其中4名患者退出了研究,最后剩下56名患者。其中,口罩组30例(男13例,女17例),平均年龄8.5 (SD 1.4)岁;固定舌器组26例(男13例,女13例),平均年龄8.9 (SD 1.7)岁。对研究开始和结束时获得的患者侧位脑电图进行分析。结果:配对t检验显示,面罩组的SNA增加了1.3°(SD 1.1°)(p)。结论:两种治疗方式均成功地使患者的上颌骨向前移动,改善了患者的轮廓;然而,笨重的口罩可能会降低患者的依从性,使他们不太喜欢选择治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The short-term effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance on maxillary deficiency in growing patients--a randomized clinical trial.

Background: The purpose of this single blind, prospective, parallel randomized trial study was to compare the effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance in treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary deficiency in growing patients.

Methods: 88 patients with maxillary deficiency were selected. 60 fulfilled the study requirements. The patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups by computer generated tables. One group was treated with removable face mask and the other group was treated by fixed tongue appliance. 4 of the patients dropped out of study leaving a final number of 56 patients. Thus, the face mask group included 30 patients (13 males, 17 females) with the mean age of 8.5 (SD 1.4) years and the fixed tongue appliance group included 26 patients (13 males, 13 females) with the mean age of 8.9 (SD 1.7) years. The patients Lateral cephalograms obtained at the beginning and end of the study were analyzed.

Results: Paired t-tests showed that SNA increased by 1.3° (SD 1.1°) in face mask group (P<0.001) and it increased by 1.8° (SD 0.9°) in fixed tongue appliance group (P<0.001). T-test showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups except for SNB. IMPA decreased significantly in both groups.

Conclusions: Both treatment modalities were successful in moving the maxilla forward and improving the profile of the patients; however, the bulky size of face masks might reduce patients' compliance and make them less favorite choice of treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信