机器人手术系统对子宫切除术趋势的影响。

Delaware medical journal Pub Date : 2015-02-01
Megan N Wasson, Matthew K Hoffman
{"title":"机器人手术系统对子宫切除术趋势的影响。","authors":"Megan N Wasson,&nbsp;Matthew K Hoffman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the impact of introduction of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study using longitudinal medical records from a tertiary care community hospital was used to determine the surgical approach to hysterectomy. For the purposes of analysis, surgical approaches were categorized as robotically assisted, laparoscopic, laparotomy, vaginal, or laparoscopically assisted vaginal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,440 women underwent a hysterectomy between January 2007 and December 2012 (benign gynecology N = 3,127, gynecologic oncology N = 1,001, urogynecology N = 312). Amongst benign gynecologists, during the five years following introduction of the robotic system, the rate of hysterectomy performed via laparotomy decreased from 62.2 percent to 39.1 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 26.4 percent, p-value < 0.001. When subspecialties were examined, the rate of hysterectomy performed by a gynecologic oncologist via laparotomy decreased from 89.7 percent to 20.0 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 78.3 percent, p-value < 0.001. Amongst urogynecologists, the rate of hysterectomy performed vaginally decreased from 80.0 percent to 33.6 percent, p-value < 0.001, while the rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 54.2 percent, p-value < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of robotically assisted hysterectomies has dramatically increased and is now the primary modality for performing hysterectomy amongst subspecialists.</p>","PeriodicalId":75779,"journal":{"name":"Delaware medical journal","volume":"87 2","pages":"45-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.\",\"authors\":\"Megan N Wasson,&nbsp;Matthew K Hoffman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the impact of introduction of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cohort study using longitudinal medical records from a tertiary care community hospital was used to determine the surgical approach to hysterectomy. For the purposes of analysis, surgical approaches were categorized as robotically assisted, laparoscopic, laparotomy, vaginal, or laparoscopically assisted vaginal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4,440 women underwent a hysterectomy between January 2007 and December 2012 (benign gynecology N = 3,127, gynecologic oncology N = 1,001, urogynecology N = 312). Amongst benign gynecologists, during the five years following introduction of the robotic system, the rate of hysterectomy performed via laparotomy decreased from 62.2 percent to 39.1 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 26.4 percent, p-value < 0.001. When subspecialties were examined, the rate of hysterectomy performed by a gynecologic oncologist via laparotomy decreased from 89.7 percent to 20.0 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 78.3 percent, p-value < 0.001. Amongst urogynecologists, the rate of hysterectomy performed vaginally decreased from 80.0 percent to 33.6 percent, p-value < 0.001, while the rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 54.2 percent, p-value < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of robotically assisted hysterectomies has dramatically increased and is now the primary modality for performing hysterectomy amongst subspecialists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"volume\":\"87 2\",\"pages\":\"45-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨机器人手术系统的引入对子宫切除术趋势的影响。方法:回顾性、队列研究,利用三级保健社区医院的纵向医疗记录来确定子宫切除术的手术方法。为了分析的目的,手术入路分为机器人辅助、腹腔镜、剖腹手术、阴道手术或腹腔镜辅助阴道手术。结果:2007年1月至2012年12月共4440例妇女行子宫切除术(良性妇科3127例,妇科肿瘤1001例,泌尿妇科312例)。在良性妇科医生中,在引入机器人系统后的五年中,通过剖腹手术进行子宫切除术的比率从62.2%下降到39.1%,p值< 0.001。机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%增加到26.4%,p值< 0.001。当检查亚专科时,妇科肿瘤医生通过剖腹手术进行子宫切除术的比率从89.7%下降到20.0%,p值< 0.001。机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%增加到78.3%,p值< 0.001。在泌尿妇科医生中,阴道子宫切除术的比例从80.0%下降到33.6%,p值< 0.001,而机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例从0.0%上升到54.2%,p值< 0.001。结论:机器人辅助子宫切除术的比例急剧增加,现在是在亚专科医生中进行子宫切除术的主要方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.

Objective: To determine the impact of introduction of a robotic surgical system on hysterectomy trends.

Methods: A retrospective, cohort study using longitudinal medical records from a tertiary care community hospital was used to determine the surgical approach to hysterectomy. For the purposes of analysis, surgical approaches were categorized as robotically assisted, laparoscopic, laparotomy, vaginal, or laparoscopically assisted vaginal.

Results: A total of 4,440 women underwent a hysterectomy between January 2007 and December 2012 (benign gynecology N = 3,127, gynecologic oncology N = 1,001, urogynecology N = 312). Amongst benign gynecologists, during the five years following introduction of the robotic system, the rate of hysterectomy performed via laparotomy decreased from 62.2 percent to 39.1 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 26.4 percent, p-value < 0.001. When subspecialties were examined, the rate of hysterectomy performed by a gynecologic oncologist via laparotomy decreased from 89.7 percent to 20.0 percent, p-value < 0.001. The rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 78.3 percent, p-value < 0.001. Amongst urogynecologists, the rate of hysterectomy performed vaginally decreased from 80.0 percent to 33.6 percent, p-value < 0.001, while the rate of robotically assisted hysterectomy increased from 0.0 percent to 54.2 percent, p-value < 0.001.

Conclusions: The percentage of robotically assisted hysterectomies has dramatically increased and is now the primary modality for performing hysterectomy amongst subspecialists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信