比较两种类型的兔ATG在降低强度条件的同种异体造血SCT治疗血液恶性肿瘤。

Bone Marrow Research Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-03-22 DOI:10.1155/2015/980924
Sandra Paiano, Eddy Roosnek, Yordanka Tirefort, Monika Nagy-Hulliger, Stavroula Masouridi, Emmanuel Levrat, Michael Bernimoulin, Saadia Huguet, Alessandro Casini, Thomas Matthes, Kaveh Samii, Jakob R Passweg, Yves Chalandon
{"title":"比较两种类型的兔ATG在降低强度条件的同种异体造血SCT治疗血液恶性肿瘤。","authors":"Sandra Paiano,&nbsp;Eddy Roosnek,&nbsp;Yordanka Tirefort,&nbsp;Monika Nagy-Hulliger,&nbsp;Stavroula Masouridi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Levrat,&nbsp;Michael Bernimoulin,&nbsp;Saadia Huguet,&nbsp;Alessandro Casini,&nbsp;Thomas Matthes,&nbsp;Kaveh Samii,&nbsp;Jakob R Passweg,&nbsp;Yves Chalandon","doi":"10.1155/2015/980924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5-4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist. </p>","PeriodicalId":9220,"journal":{"name":"Bone Marrow Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/980924","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Paiano,&nbsp;Eddy Roosnek,&nbsp;Yordanka Tirefort,&nbsp;Monika Nagy-Hulliger,&nbsp;Stavroula Masouridi,&nbsp;Emmanuel Levrat,&nbsp;Michael Bernimoulin,&nbsp;Saadia Huguet,&nbsp;Alessandro Casini,&nbsp;Thomas Matthes,&nbsp;Kaveh Samii,&nbsp;Jakob R Passweg,&nbsp;Yves Chalandon\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/980924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5-4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone Marrow Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/980924\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone Marrow Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/980924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone Marrow Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/980924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

不同的兔多克隆抗淋巴细胞球蛋白(ATGs)用于同种异体造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)以预防移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)。我们比较了两种不同的ATGs在血液恶性肿瘤的同种异体造血干细胞移植后降低强度调节(RIC)。我们回顾了2007年至2010年间以氟达拉滨和静脉注射布苏凡作为调节方案的30例恶性血液肿瘤的同种异体造血干细胞移植。患者交替接受胸腺球蛋白或ATG-F治疗。中位随访时间为3.3(2.5-4.5)年。胸腺球蛋白输注组不良事件发生率高于ATG-F输注组,但无统计学意义(P = 0.14)。胸腺球蛋白组与ATG-F组在3年总生存率(OS)、无病生存率(DFS)、复发率和移植相关死亡率(TRM)方面也无差异:45.7%对46.7%、40%对33.7%、40%对33.3%、20%对33.3%。移植失败、排斥反应、感染并发症、免疫重建和急性或慢性GvHD也是如此。在RIC后因血液系统恶性肿瘤进行移植的患者中,胸腺球蛋白的使用在本研究评估的所有方面与ATG-F相当。然而,由于每组患者数量少,我们不能排除可能存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies.

Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies.

Comparing Two Types of Rabbit ATG prior to Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic SCT for Hematologic Malignancies.

Different rabbit polyclonal antilymphocyte globulins (ATGs) are used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). We compared 2 different ATGs in alloHSCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) for hematological malignancies. We reviewed 30 alloHSCT for hematologic malignancies performed between 2007 and 2010 with fludarabine and i.v. busulfan as conditioning regimen. Patients alternatingly received Thymoglobulin or ATG-F. Median followup was 3.3 (2.5-4.5) years. Adverse events appeared to occur more frequently during Thymoglobulin infusion than during ATG-F infusion but without statistical significance (P = 0.14). There were also no differences in 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), relapse incidence, and transplant related mortality (TRM) in the Thymoglobulin versus ATG-F group: 45.7% versus 46.7%, 40% versus 33.7%, 40% versus 33.3%, and 20% versus 33.3%. The same held for graft failure, rejection, infectious complications, immune reconstitution, and acute or chronic GvHD. In patients transplanted for hematologic malignancies after RIC, the use of Thymoglobulin is comparable to that of ATG-F in all the aspects evaluated in the study. However due to the small number of patients in each group we cannot exclude a possible difference that may exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信