应用经食管超声心动图测量的降主动脉壁厚度作为主动脉夹层的危险指标。

Zaher Fanari, Sumaya Hammami, Muhammad Baraa Hammami, Safa Hammami, Chete Eze-Nliam, William S Weintraub
{"title":"应用经食管超声心动图测量的降主动脉壁厚度作为主动脉夹层的危险指标。","authors":"Zaher Fanari,&nbsp;Sumaya Hammami,&nbsp;Muhammad Baraa Hammami,&nbsp;Safa Hammami,&nbsp;Chete Eze-Nliam,&nbsp;William S Weintraub","doi":"10.5083/ejcm.20424884.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to estimate whether aortic wall thickness is increased in patients with Aortic dissection (AD) compared to low risk control group and can be used in addition to aortic diameter as a risk marker of AD.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AD occurs due to pathologies that may increase thickness of the aortic wall. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has the ability to visualize both the thoracic aortic wall and lumen. Aortic diameter has been used to predict aortic dissection and timing of surgery, but it is not always predictive of that risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 48 patients with AD who underwent TEE were examined retrospectively and compared to 48 control patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). We measured aortic diameter at different levels, intimal/medial thickness (IMT) and complete wall thickness (CMT). Demographic data and cardiovascular risk factors were reviewed. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and student t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(AD) patients were older [mean age 66 AD vs. 51 PFO], had more hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and Coronary artery disease. Both IMT and CMT in the descending aorta were increased in AD group [(1.85 vs. 1.43 mm; P=0.03 and 2.93 vs. 2.46 mm; p=0.01). As expected the diameter of ascending aorta was also greater in AD (4.61 vs. 2.92 cm; P=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMT and IMT in the descending aorta detected by TEE is greater in patients with AD when compared to control and may add prognostic data to that of aortic diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":75000,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"448-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429792/pdf/nihms687080.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using The Descending Aortic Wall Thickness Measured In Transesophageal Echocardiography As A Risk Marker For Aortic Dissection.\",\"authors\":\"Zaher Fanari,&nbsp;Sumaya Hammami,&nbsp;Muhammad Baraa Hammami,&nbsp;Safa Hammami,&nbsp;Chete Eze-Nliam,&nbsp;William S Weintraub\",\"doi\":\"10.5083/ejcm.20424884.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to estimate whether aortic wall thickness is increased in patients with Aortic dissection (AD) compared to low risk control group and can be used in addition to aortic diameter as a risk marker of AD.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>AD occurs due to pathologies that may increase thickness of the aortic wall. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has the ability to visualize both the thoracic aortic wall and lumen. Aortic diameter has been used to predict aortic dissection and timing of surgery, but it is not always predictive of that risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 48 patients with AD who underwent TEE were examined retrospectively and compared to 48 control patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). We measured aortic diameter at different levels, intimal/medial thickness (IMT) and complete wall thickness (CMT). Demographic data and cardiovascular risk factors were reviewed. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and student t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(AD) patients were older [mean age 66 AD vs. 51 PFO], had more hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and Coronary artery disease. Both IMT and CMT in the descending aorta were increased in AD group [(1.85 vs. 1.43 mm; P=0.03 and 2.93 vs. 2.46 mm; p=0.01). As expected the diameter of ascending aorta was also greater in AD (4.61 vs. 2.92 cm; P=0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CMT and IMT in the descending aorta detected by TEE is greater in patients with AD when compared to control and may add prognostic data to that of aortic diameter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"448-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4429792/pdf/nihms687080.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5083/ejcm.20424884.136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5083/ejcm.20424884.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估主动脉夹层(aortic dissection, AD)患者的主动脉壁厚度是否比低风险对照组增加,并可作为除主动脉直径外AD的风险指标。背景:AD的发生是由于病变可能增加主动脉壁的厚度。经食管超声心动图(TEE)能够同时显示胸主动脉壁和管腔。主动脉直径被用来预测主动脉夹层和手术时机,但它并不总是预测这种风险。方法:回顾性分析48例经TEE治疗的AD患者,并与对照组48例卵圆孔未闭(PFO)患者进行比较。我们测量了不同水平的主动脉直径、内膜/内侧厚度(IMT)和完全壁厚(CMT)。回顾了人口统计数据和心血管危险因素。数据分析采用方差分析和学生t检验。结果:(AD)患者年龄较大[平均年龄66 AD vs 51 PFO],高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症和冠状动脉疾病较多。AD组降主动脉IMT和CMT均升高[(1.85 vs. 1.43 mm;P=0.03和2.93 vs. 2.46 mm;p = 0.01)。正如预期的那样,AD患者升主动脉直径也更大(4.61比2.92 cm;P = 0.004)。结论:TEE检测的AD患者降主动脉CMT和IMT高于对照组,并可能在主动脉直径的基础上增加预后数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using The Descending Aortic Wall Thickness Measured In Transesophageal Echocardiography As A Risk Marker For Aortic Dissection.

Using The Descending Aortic Wall Thickness Measured In Transesophageal Echocardiography As A Risk Marker For Aortic Dissection.

Using The Descending Aortic Wall Thickness Measured In Transesophageal Echocardiography As A Risk Marker For Aortic Dissection.

Objective: The aim of this study is to estimate whether aortic wall thickness is increased in patients with Aortic dissection (AD) compared to low risk control group and can be used in addition to aortic diameter as a risk marker of AD.

Background: AD occurs due to pathologies that may increase thickness of the aortic wall. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has the ability to visualize both the thoracic aortic wall and lumen. Aortic diameter has been used to predict aortic dissection and timing of surgery, but it is not always predictive of that risk.

Methods: In 48 patients with AD who underwent TEE were examined retrospectively and compared to 48 control patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO). We measured aortic diameter at different levels, intimal/medial thickness (IMT) and complete wall thickness (CMT). Demographic data and cardiovascular risk factors were reviewed. The data was analyzed using ANOVA and student t test.

Results: (AD) patients were older [mean age 66 AD vs. 51 PFO], had more hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and Coronary artery disease. Both IMT and CMT in the descending aorta were increased in AD group [(1.85 vs. 1.43 mm; P=0.03 and 2.93 vs. 2.46 mm; p=0.01). As expected the diameter of ascending aorta was also greater in AD (4.61 vs. 2.92 cm; P=0.004).

Conclusions: CMT and IMT in the descending aorta detected by TEE is greater in patients with AD when compared to control and may add prognostic data to that of aortic diameter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信