老年血液透析合并糖尿病患者两种贫血治疗策略的相似结果

M Thamer, Y Zhang, J Kaufman, D Cotter, M A Hernán
{"title":"老年血液透析合并糖尿病患者两种贫血治疗策略的相似结果","authors":"M Thamer,&nbsp;Y Zhang,&nbsp;J Kaufman,&nbsp;D Cotter,&nbsp;M A Hernán","doi":"10.15226/2374-6890/1/2/00111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To compare mortality and cardiovascular risk in elderly dialysis patients with diabetes under two clinical strategies of anemia correction: maintaining hematocrit (Hct) between 34.5 and < 39.0% (high Hct strategy), and between 30.0 and <34.5% (low Hct strategy) using intravenous alpha epoetin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data were used to emulate a randomized trial in which diabetic patients who initiated hemodialysis in 2006-2008 were assigned to each anemia correction strategy. Inverse-probability weighting was used to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing high with low hematocrit strategy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.07 (0.83, 1.38) for all-cause mortality and 1.00 (0.81, 1.24) for a composite mortality and cardiovascular endpoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among a cohort of elderly hemodialysis patients with diabetes, no differences were found between the low and high hematocrit strategies. A lower target hematocrit - per current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines - appears to be as safe as higher targets among this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73731,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378694/pdf/nihms649654.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Similar Outcomes for Two Anemia Treatment Strategies among Elderly Hemodialysis Patients with Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"M Thamer,&nbsp;Y Zhang,&nbsp;J Kaufman,&nbsp;D Cotter,&nbsp;M A Hernán\",\"doi\":\"10.15226/2374-6890/1/2/00111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>To compare mortality and cardiovascular risk in elderly dialysis patients with diabetes under two clinical strategies of anemia correction: maintaining hematocrit (Hct) between 34.5 and < 39.0% (high Hct strategy), and between 30.0 and <34.5% (low Hct strategy) using intravenous alpha epoetin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational data were used to emulate a randomized trial in which diabetic patients who initiated hemodialysis in 2006-2008 were assigned to each anemia correction strategy. Inverse-probability weighting was used to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing high with low hematocrit strategy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.07 (0.83, 1.38) for all-cause mortality and 1.00 (0.81, 1.24) for a composite mortality and cardiovascular endpoint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among a cohort of elderly hemodialysis patients with diabetes, no differences were found between the low and high hematocrit strategies. A lower target hematocrit - per current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines - appears to be as safe as higher targets among this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4378694/pdf/nihms649654.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/1/2/00111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endocrinology and diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15226/2374-6890/1/2/00111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景/目的:比较老年透析合并糖尿病患者在两种临床贫血矫正策略下的死亡率和心血管风险:维持血细胞比容(Hct)在34.5 - < 39.0%(高Hct策略)和30.0 - 30.0之间。方法:观察性数据用于模拟一项随机试验,该试验将2006-2008年开始血液透析的糖尿病患者分配到每种贫血矫正策略。使用逆概率加权来调整测量的时间相关混淆。结果:比较高和低红细胞压积策略,全因死亡率的风险比(95%置信区间)为1.07(0.83,1.38),综合死亡率和心血管终点的风险比为1.00(0.81,1.24)。结论:在一组老年糖尿病血液透析患者中,低和高红细胞压积策略之间没有差异。根据美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)目前的指导方针,在这一人群中,较低的目标血细胞比容似乎与较高的目标一样安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Similar Outcomes for Two Anemia Treatment Strategies among Elderly Hemodialysis Patients with Diabetes.

Similar Outcomes for Two Anemia Treatment Strategies among Elderly Hemodialysis Patients with Diabetes.

Background/aims: To compare mortality and cardiovascular risk in elderly dialysis patients with diabetes under two clinical strategies of anemia correction: maintaining hematocrit (Hct) between 34.5 and < 39.0% (high Hct strategy), and between 30.0 and <34.5% (low Hct strategy) using intravenous alpha epoetin.

Methods: Observational data were used to emulate a randomized trial in which diabetic patients who initiated hemodialysis in 2006-2008 were assigned to each anemia correction strategy. Inverse-probability weighting was used to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding.

Results: Comparing high with low hematocrit strategy, the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 1.07 (0.83, 1.38) for all-cause mortality and 1.00 (0.81, 1.24) for a composite mortality and cardiovascular endpoint.

Conclusions: Among a cohort of elderly hemodialysis patients with diabetes, no differences were found between the low and high hematocrit strategies. A lower target hematocrit - per current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines - appears to be as safe as higher targets among this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信