[后生动物的早期历史——一个古生物学家的观点]。

Pub Date : 2014-11-01
A Iu Zhuravleva
{"title":"[后生动物的早期历史——一个古生物学家的观点]。","authors":"A Iu Zhuravleva","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The molecular biology success, which became influential for a revision of principal views on the relationships and evolutionary pathways of major groups (\"phyla\") of multicellular animals, were much more appreciated by palaeontologists rather than by neontologists. This is not surprising because this is the fossil record that serves as a firm test for molecular biological hypotheses. The fossil record indicates that the different \"phyla\" united nowadays into the Ecdysozoa, namely, arthropods, onychophorans, tardigrades, priapulids, nematomorphs, comprise a number of transitional forms having become extinct already in the early Palaeozoic. The very appearance of those organisms fits entirely to hypothetical ancestral forms which have to exist in accordance with some data on ontogeny. There are no even tentative intermediates between arthropods and annelids in the fossil record. The oldest Deuterostomia, which is the only branch of the Bilateria being agreed upon by all the biological disciplines, allow us, although in less details, to present their early history and point to agile bilaterally-symmetrical forms at the dawn of chordates, hemichordates, and echinoderms. The interpretation of the early history of the Lophotrochozoa is even more difficult because in comparison to other bilaterians, their oldest fossils are preserved as mineralized skeletons only. However, a unity of microstructures of molluscs, brachiopods, and bryozoans, absent in other metazoans, is indicative of the presence of close relatives among different earliest lophotrochozoans some of which are sedentary filterers while others are motile epibenthic detritophages. In the aggregate, modern data of molecular biology, palaeontology, and comparative embryology/morphology, having got a second wind with an introduction of new microscopy techniques, imply that the suggestion of a planktotrophic gastraea-like common ancestor is the least possible among diverse suggestions on the Metazoa origins. The common ancestor of the Bilateria had to be a motile epibenthic animal and the explosive metazoan diversification embracing the late Ediacaran--early Cambrian interval (c. 40 Ma) was probably a real event, which was predated by a long (c. a billion years) assembly of the metazoan genome within unicellular and colonial common ancestors of the Opisthokonta and even the Unikonta as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Early history of the Metazoa--a palaeontologist's viewpoint].\",\"authors\":\"A Iu Zhuravleva\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The molecular biology success, which became influential for a revision of principal views on the relationships and evolutionary pathways of major groups (\\\"phyla\\\") of multicellular animals, were much more appreciated by palaeontologists rather than by neontologists. This is not surprising because this is the fossil record that serves as a firm test for molecular biological hypotheses. The fossil record indicates that the different \\\"phyla\\\" united nowadays into the Ecdysozoa, namely, arthropods, onychophorans, tardigrades, priapulids, nematomorphs, comprise a number of transitional forms having become extinct already in the early Palaeozoic. The very appearance of those organisms fits entirely to hypothetical ancestral forms which have to exist in accordance with some data on ontogeny. There are no even tentative intermediates between arthropods and annelids in the fossil record. The oldest Deuterostomia, which is the only branch of the Bilateria being agreed upon by all the biological disciplines, allow us, although in less details, to present their early history and point to agile bilaterally-symmetrical forms at the dawn of chordates, hemichordates, and echinoderms. The interpretation of the early history of the Lophotrochozoa is even more difficult because in comparison to other bilaterians, their oldest fossils are preserved as mineralized skeletons only. However, a unity of microstructures of molluscs, brachiopods, and bryozoans, absent in other metazoans, is indicative of the presence of close relatives among different earliest lophotrochozoans some of which are sedentary filterers while others are motile epibenthic detritophages. In the aggregate, modern data of molecular biology, palaeontology, and comparative embryology/morphology, having got a second wind with an introduction of new microscopy techniques, imply that the suggestion of a planktotrophic gastraea-like common ancestor is the least possible among diverse suggestions on the Metazoa origins. The common ancestor of the Bilateria had to be a motile epibenthic animal and the explosive metazoan diversification embracing the late Ediacaran--early Cambrian interval (c. 40 Ma) was probably a real event, which was predated by a long (c. a billion years) assembly of the metazoan genome within unicellular and colonial common ancestors of the Opisthokonta and even the Unikonta as a whole.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分子生物学的成功对修订多细胞动物主要类群(“门”)的关系和进化途径的主要观点产生了影响,古生物学家比新生生物学家更欣赏这一点。这并不奇怪,因为这是化石记录,可以作为分子生物学假设的可靠测试。化石记录表明,不同的“门”,即节肢动物、爪足动物、缓步动物、原肢动物、线形动物,组成了许多在古生代早期已经灭绝的过渡形式。这些有机体的外观完全符合假设的祖先形式,这些形式必须根据个体发生的一些数据而存在。在化石记录中甚至没有节肢动物和环节动物之间暂定的中间动物。最古老的后口动物是所有生物学学科都认可的唯一的双足动物分支,尽管不太详细,但它使我们能够展示它们的早期历史,并指出在脊索动物、半脊索动物和棘皮动物出现时敏捷的双侧对称形式。对光藻动物早期历史的解释更加困难,因为与其他双边动物相比,它们最古老的化石只以矿化骨架的形式保存下来。然而,软体动物、腕足动物和苔藓动物的微观结构的统一,在其他后生动物中是不存在的,这表明不同最早的光栖动物之间存在近亲,其中一些是静止的过滤器,而另一些是活动的底栖食腐动物。总的来说,分子生物学、古生物学和比较胚胎学/形态学的现代数据,随着新的显微镜技术的引入而重获新生,表明在关于后生动物起源的各种说法中,浮游营养类胃原动物共同祖先的说法是最不可能的。两侧门的共同祖先必须是一种活动的底栖动物,而在埃迪卡拉纪晚期-寒武纪早期(约40 Ma)的后生动物多样化爆发可能是一个真实的事件,在此之前,后生动物基因组在单细胞和群居的Opisthokonta甚至Unikonta的共同祖先中进行了长时间(约10亿年)的组装。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
[Early history of the Metazoa--a palaeontologist's viewpoint].

The molecular biology success, which became influential for a revision of principal views on the relationships and evolutionary pathways of major groups ("phyla") of multicellular animals, were much more appreciated by palaeontologists rather than by neontologists. This is not surprising because this is the fossil record that serves as a firm test for molecular biological hypotheses. The fossil record indicates that the different "phyla" united nowadays into the Ecdysozoa, namely, arthropods, onychophorans, tardigrades, priapulids, nematomorphs, comprise a number of transitional forms having become extinct already in the early Palaeozoic. The very appearance of those organisms fits entirely to hypothetical ancestral forms which have to exist in accordance with some data on ontogeny. There are no even tentative intermediates between arthropods and annelids in the fossil record. The oldest Deuterostomia, which is the only branch of the Bilateria being agreed upon by all the biological disciplines, allow us, although in less details, to present their early history and point to agile bilaterally-symmetrical forms at the dawn of chordates, hemichordates, and echinoderms. The interpretation of the early history of the Lophotrochozoa is even more difficult because in comparison to other bilaterians, their oldest fossils are preserved as mineralized skeletons only. However, a unity of microstructures of molluscs, brachiopods, and bryozoans, absent in other metazoans, is indicative of the presence of close relatives among different earliest lophotrochozoans some of which are sedentary filterers while others are motile epibenthic detritophages. In the aggregate, modern data of molecular biology, palaeontology, and comparative embryology/morphology, having got a second wind with an introduction of new microscopy techniques, imply that the suggestion of a planktotrophic gastraea-like common ancestor is the least possible among diverse suggestions on the Metazoa origins. The common ancestor of the Bilateria had to be a motile epibenthic animal and the explosive metazoan diversification embracing the late Ediacaran--early Cambrian interval (c. 40 Ma) was probably a real event, which was predated by a long (c. a billion years) assembly of the metazoan genome within unicellular and colonial common ancestors of the Opisthokonta and even the Unikonta as a whole.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信