动物分类学中亚种范畴的命运。1. 历史上]。

Pub Date : 2015-01-01
M V Vinarskiĭ
{"title":"动物分类学中亚种范畴的命运。1. 历史上]。","authors":"M V Vinarskiĭ","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subspecies is the only taxonomical category inferior to species which application is governed by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Although the first attempts to use it are dated by the end of XVIII century, it becomes regularly applied only by the middle of XIX century, along with trinomial nomenclature. At that, the current sense of the term, i.e. subspecies as a morphologically and spatially separated population group or as a synonym for \"geographical race\", has become established even later, by the end of XIX century. The concept of polytypic species, which has already taken shape in 1900s (in the works by ornithologist E. Hartert and entomologist K. Jordan), has been incorporated later into the modern evolutionary synthesis. The peak of the concept popularity fell on 1940-50s, then the evident crisis of subspecies systematics began to show, and is still showing nowadays, especially in systematics of invertebrates. The reasons behind the drop of subspecies category popularity are discussed, among them the emergence of novel species concepts where the rank of subspecies is not used (the phylogenetic species concept), impossibility to verify the validity of previously described subspecies by means of statistics or molecular systematics, etc. Nevertheless, in systematics of vertebrates, the category of subspecies still remains called-for.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The fate of subspecies category in zoological systematics. 1. The history].\",\"authors\":\"M V Vinarskiĭ\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subspecies is the only taxonomical category inferior to species which application is governed by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Although the first attempts to use it are dated by the end of XVIII century, it becomes regularly applied only by the middle of XIX century, along with trinomial nomenclature. At that, the current sense of the term, i.e. subspecies as a morphologically and spatially separated population group or as a synonym for \\\"geographical race\\\", has become established even later, by the end of XIX century. The concept of polytypic species, which has already taken shape in 1900s (in the works by ornithologist E. Hartert and entomologist K. Jordan), has been incorporated later into the modern evolutionary synthesis. The peak of the concept popularity fell on 1940-50s, then the evident crisis of subspecies systematics began to show, and is still showing nowadays, especially in systematics of invertebrates. The reasons behind the drop of subspecies category popularity are discussed, among them the emergence of novel species concepts where the rank of subspecies is not used (the phylogenetic species concept), impossibility to verify the validity of previously described subspecies by means of statistics or molecular systematics, etc. Nevertheless, in systematics of vertebrates, the category of subspecies still remains called-for.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚种是唯一低于种的分类范畴,其应用受《国际动物命名法》的管辖。虽然第一次尝试使用它是在十八世纪末,但直到十九世纪中叶,它才与三项式命名法一起被经常使用。至此,这个术语的当前意义,即亚种作为形态上和空间上分离的种群或作为“地理种族”的同义词,甚至在19世纪末才得以确立。多型物种的概念在20世纪初就已经形成(在鸟类学家E. Hartert和昆虫学家K. Jordan的著作中),后来被纳入现代进化综合理论。这一概念的普及高峰出现在1940-50年代,随后亚种系统分类学的明显危机开始显现,并在今天仍在显现,特别是在无脊椎动物系统分类学中。讨论了亚种分类普及度下降的原因,其中包括不使用亚种等级的新物种概念的出现(系统发育物种概念),无法通过统计学或分子系统学来验证先前描述的亚种的有效性等。然而,在脊椎动物的系统学中,亚种的分类仍然是需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
[The fate of subspecies category in zoological systematics. 1. The history].

Subspecies is the only taxonomical category inferior to species which application is governed by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Although the first attempts to use it are dated by the end of XVIII century, it becomes regularly applied only by the middle of XIX century, along with trinomial nomenclature. At that, the current sense of the term, i.e. subspecies as a morphologically and spatially separated population group or as a synonym for "geographical race", has become established even later, by the end of XIX century. The concept of polytypic species, which has already taken shape in 1900s (in the works by ornithologist E. Hartert and entomologist K. Jordan), has been incorporated later into the modern evolutionary synthesis. The peak of the concept popularity fell on 1940-50s, then the evident crisis of subspecies systematics began to show, and is still showing nowadays, especially in systematics of invertebrates. The reasons behind the drop of subspecies category popularity are discussed, among them the emergence of novel species concepts where the rank of subspecies is not used (the phylogenetic species concept), impossibility to verify the validity of previously described subspecies by means of statistics or molecular systematics, etc. Nevertheless, in systematics of vertebrates, the category of subspecies still remains called-for.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信