挑战反应量表(RCS):一种儿童自我调节的观察者评价量表的开发与构建效度。

Kimberley D Lakes
{"title":"挑战反应量表(RCS):一种儿童自我调节的观察者评价量表的开发与构建效度。","authors":"Kimberley D Lakes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this manuscript, I present an observer-rated measure of child self-regulation, the Response to Challenge Scale (RCS). The RCS was designed to measure children's cognitive, affective, and motor regulation in response to a physical challenge course. 198 children (Kindergarten through fifth grade) were evaluated using the RCS. All children individually completed a challenge course on two separate occasions four months apart. During their completion of the tasks, research-trained observers rated the degree to which children exhibited cognitive, affective, and motor regulation. In a fully-crossed research design, five raters on Occasion 1 and six raters on Occasion 2 rated all children. I examined the RCS within the Generalizability Theory (GT) framework to analyze construct validity (PRS). Results demonstrated that raters are able to distinguish between children's self-regulation in various domains, providing some validity evidence for the RCS, and supporting the theory that self-regulation is a construct that is evidenced in different domains (Baumeister, 1997).</p>","PeriodicalId":90981,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of educational and psychological assessment","volume":"10 1","pages":"83-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349369/pdf/nihms461022.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Response to Challenge Scale (RCS): The Development and Construct Validity of an Observer-Rated Measure of Children's Self-Regulation.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley D Lakes\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this manuscript, I present an observer-rated measure of child self-regulation, the Response to Challenge Scale (RCS). The RCS was designed to measure children's cognitive, affective, and motor regulation in response to a physical challenge course. 198 children (Kindergarten through fifth grade) were evaluated using the RCS. All children individually completed a challenge course on two separate occasions four months apart. During their completion of the tasks, research-trained observers rated the degree to which children exhibited cognitive, affective, and motor regulation. In a fully-crossed research design, five raters on Occasion 1 and six raters on Occasion 2 rated all children. I examined the RCS within the Generalizability Theory (GT) framework to analyze construct validity (PRS). Results demonstrated that raters are able to distinguish between children's self-regulation in various domains, providing some validity evidence for the RCS, and supporting the theory that self-regulation is a construct that is evidenced in different domains (Baumeister, 1997).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of educational and psychological assessment\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"83-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4349369/pdf/nihms461022.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of educational and psychological assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of educational and psychological assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇手稿中,我提出了一个观察者评价的儿童自我调节措施,挑战反应量表(RCS)。RCS的设计是为了测量儿童的认知,情感和运动调节反应的物理挑战课程。198名儿童(幼儿园至五年级)使用RCS进行评估。所有的孩子分别在两个不同的场合完成了一个挑战课程,间隔四个月。在他们完成任务的过程中,受过研究训练的观察员对儿童表现出的认知、情感和运动调节的程度进行了评级。在一个完全交叉的研究设计中,情境1有5名评分员,情境2有6名评分员对所有儿童进行评分。我在概括性理论(GT)框架内检查了RCS来分析结构效度(PRS)。结果表明,评分者能够区分儿童在不同领域的自我调节,为RCS提供了一定的效度证据,并支持了自我调节是一个在不同领域得到证明的结构的理论(Baumeister, 1997)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Response to Challenge Scale (RCS): The Development and Construct Validity of an Observer-Rated Measure of Children's Self-Regulation.

In this manuscript, I present an observer-rated measure of child self-regulation, the Response to Challenge Scale (RCS). The RCS was designed to measure children's cognitive, affective, and motor regulation in response to a physical challenge course. 198 children (Kindergarten through fifth grade) were evaluated using the RCS. All children individually completed a challenge course on two separate occasions four months apart. During their completion of the tasks, research-trained observers rated the degree to which children exhibited cognitive, affective, and motor regulation. In a fully-crossed research design, five raters on Occasion 1 and six raters on Occasion 2 rated all children. I examined the RCS within the Generalizability Theory (GT) framework to analyze construct validity (PRS). Results demonstrated that raters are able to distinguish between children's self-regulation in various domains, providing some validity evidence for the RCS, and supporting the theory that self-regulation is a construct that is evidenced in different domains (Baumeister, 1997).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信