以社区为基础的初级保健实践的关键活动,以提高糖尿病护理的质量,响应实践促进。

Quality in primary care Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Polly Hitchcock Noël, Raquel Lozano Romero, Michaela Robertson, Michael L Parchman
{"title":"以社区为基础的初级保健实践的关键活动,以提高糖尿病护理的质量,响应实践促进。","authors":"Polly Hitchcock Noël,&nbsp;Raquel Lozano Romero,&nbsp;Michaela Robertson,&nbsp;Michael L Parchman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent systematic review suggests that practice facilitation (PF) is a robust intervention for implementing evidence-based preventive care guidelines in primary care, but the ability of PF to improve chronic illness care remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the specific activities and Chronic Care model (CCM) components that primary care practices implemented and sustained in response to a 12-month PF intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ABC trial tested the effectiveness of PF to improve care for diabetes in 40 small community-based primary care practices that were randomized to \"initial\" or \"delayed\" intervention arms. A trained facilitator met with each practice over 12-months. Facilitators used interactive consensus building to help practices implement one or more of quality improvement activities based on the CCM. Facilitators prospectively recorded implementation activities reported by practice teams during monthly meetings and confirmed which of these were sustained at the end of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 practices implemented and sustained a total of 43 unique activities [range 1-15, average 6.5 (SD=2.9)]. The number (%) of practices that implemented 1 or more key activities in each CCM component varied: Patient Self-Management Support: 37 (100%); Clinical Information Systems: 24 (64.9%), Delivery System Design: 14 (37.8%), Decision Support: 13 (35.1%), Community Linkages: 2 (5.4%); Healthcare System Support: 2 (2.7%). The majority of practices (59%) only implemented activities from 1 or 2 CCM components. The number of sustained activities was associated with the number of PF visits, but not with practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In spite of the PF intervention, it was difficult for these small practices to implement comprehensive CCM changes. Although practices implemented and sustained a remarkable number and variety of key activities, the majority of these focused on patient self-management support, as opposed to other components of the CCM, such as clinical information systems, decision support, delivery system redesign, and community linkages.</p>","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"22 4","pages":"211-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326068/pdf/nihms614606.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key activities used by community based primary care practices to improve the quality of diabetes care in response to practice facilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Polly Hitchcock Noël,&nbsp;Raquel Lozano Romero,&nbsp;Michaela Robertson,&nbsp;Michael L Parchman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent systematic review suggests that practice facilitation (PF) is a robust intervention for implementing evidence-based preventive care guidelines in primary care, but the ability of PF to improve chronic illness care remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the specific activities and Chronic Care model (CCM) components that primary care practices implemented and sustained in response to a 12-month PF intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ABC trial tested the effectiveness of PF to improve care for diabetes in 40 small community-based primary care practices that were randomized to \\\"initial\\\" or \\\"delayed\\\" intervention arms. A trained facilitator met with each practice over 12-months. Facilitators used interactive consensus building to help practices implement one or more of quality improvement activities based on the CCM. Facilitators prospectively recorded implementation activities reported by practice teams during monthly meetings and confirmed which of these were sustained at the end of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 practices implemented and sustained a total of 43 unique activities [range 1-15, average 6.5 (SD=2.9)]. The number (%) of practices that implemented 1 or more key activities in each CCM component varied: Patient Self-Management Support: 37 (100%); Clinical Information Systems: 24 (64.9%), Delivery System Design: 14 (37.8%), Decision Support: 13 (35.1%), Community Linkages: 2 (5.4%); Healthcare System Support: 2 (2.7%). The majority of practices (59%) only implemented activities from 1 or 2 CCM components. The number of sustained activities was associated with the number of PF visits, but not with practice characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In spite of the PF intervention, it was difficult for these small practices to implement comprehensive CCM changes. Although practices implemented and sustained a remarkable number and variety of key activities, the majority of these focused on patient self-management support, as opposed to other components of the CCM, such as clinical information systems, decision support, delivery system redesign, and community linkages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"211-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4326068/pdf/nihms614606.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近的一项系统综述表明,实践促进(PF)是在初级保健中实施循证预防保健指南的有力干预措施,但PF改善慢性病护理的能力尚不清楚。目的:研究针对为期12个月的PF干预,初级保健实践实施和维持的具体活动和慢性护理模式(CCM)组成部分。方法:ABC试验在40个小型社区初级保健实践中测试了PF改善糖尿病护理的有效性,这些实践被随机分为“初始”或“延迟”干预组。一名训练有素的协调员在12个月的时间里与每个实践会面。促进者使用交互式共识构建来帮助实践实现基于CCM的一个或多个质量改进活动。促进者在每月会议期间记录实践小组报告的实施活动,并确认哪些活动在干预结束时得到维持。结果:37个实践实施并维持了43个独特的活动[范围1-15,平均6.5 (SD=2.9)]。在每个CCM组成部分中实施1项或更多关键活动的实践数量(%)各不相同:患者自我管理支持:37 (100%);临床信息系统:24个(64.9%),交付系统设计:14个(37.8%),决策支持:13个(35.1%),社区联系:2个(5.4%);医疗保健系统支持:2(2.7%)。大多数实践(59%)只实现来自1或2个CCM组件的活动。持续活动的次数与PF访问次数相关,但与实践特征无关。结论:尽管有PF的干预,但这些小诊所很难实施全面的CCM改变。尽管实践实施并维持了数量和种类繁多的关键活动,但这些活动中的大多数侧重于患者自我管理支持,而不是CCM的其他组成部分,如临床信息系统、决策支持、交付系统重新设计和社区联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key activities used by community based primary care practices to improve the quality of diabetes care in response to practice facilitation.

Background: A recent systematic review suggests that practice facilitation (PF) is a robust intervention for implementing evidence-based preventive care guidelines in primary care, but the ability of PF to improve chronic illness care remains unclear.

Aims: To examine the specific activities and Chronic Care model (CCM) components that primary care practices implemented and sustained in response to a 12-month PF intervention.

Methods: The ABC trial tested the effectiveness of PF to improve care for diabetes in 40 small community-based primary care practices that were randomized to "initial" or "delayed" intervention arms. A trained facilitator met with each practice over 12-months. Facilitators used interactive consensus building to help practices implement one or more of quality improvement activities based on the CCM. Facilitators prospectively recorded implementation activities reported by practice teams during monthly meetings and confirmed which of these were sustained at the end of the intervention.

Results: 37 practices implemented and sustained a total of 43 unique activities [range 1-15, average 6.5 (SD=2.9)]. The number (%) of practices that implemented 1 or more key activities in each CCM component varied: Patient Self-Management Support: 37 (100%); Clinical Information Systems: 24 (64.9%), Delivery System Design: 14 (37.8%), Decision Support: 13 (35.1%), Community Linkages: 2 (5.4%); Healthcare System Support: 2 (2.7%). The majority of practices (59%) only implemented activities from 1 or 2 CCM components. The number of sustained activities was associated with the number of PF visits, but not with practice characteristics.

Conclusions: In spite of the PF intervention, it was difficult for these small practices to implement comprehensive CCM changes. Although practices implemented and sustained a remarkable number and variety of key activities, the majority of these focused on patient self-management support, as opposed to other components of the CCM, such as clinical information systems, decision support, delivery system redesign, and community linkages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信