通过行动委员会动员保健队:从内部改善人口健康的战略。

Q4 Medicine
Susan Moffatt-Bruce, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Alison Aldrich, Tina Latimer, Edmund Funai
{"title":"通过行动委员会动员保健队:从内部改善人口健康的战略。","authors":"Susan Moffatt-Bruce,&nbsp;Ann Scheck McAlearney,&nbsp;Alison Aldrich,&nbsp;Tina Latimer,&nbsp;Edmund Funai","doi":"10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Clinical front-line staff are best positioned within the organizations to identify patient safety problems and craft solutions. However, in traditional models, safety committees are led by senior executives who are not clinically responsible for patients. This top-down approach can result in missed opportunities to address patient-centered challenges and better manage the health of the defined populations served by these organizations.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>To foster teamwork, enhance empowerment, and improve the patient care environment, Operations Councils led by trained front-line staff were deployed in 15 clinical areas at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) as a performance improvement tool.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Standardized training of Council facilitators was designed and implemented to guide the performance improvement process. Balanced scorecards were developed in each Council based on the risks and concerns of that particular clinical area. After initial implementation of the Operations Councils, patient safety events declined and team engagement improved by over 34% across the medical center; the highest changes were seen in areas where Operations Councils had been deployed. Additionally, outcome metrics including area-specific and system-wide mortality and readmissions improved after implementation.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>We suggest that this type of approach may be an appropriate strategy to consider in other health care organizations as such institutions are challenged to better manage the health of their defined patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"51-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging the health care team through Operations Councils: strategies to improve population health from within.\",\"authors\":\"Susan Moffatt-Bruce,&nbsp;Ann Scheck McAlearney,&nbsp;Alison Aldrich,&nbsp;Tina Latimer,&nbsp;Edmund Funai\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Clinical front-line staff are best positioned within the organizations to identify patient safety problems and craft solutions. However, in traditional models, safety committees are led by senior executives who are not clinically responsible for patients. This top-down approach can result in missed opportunities to address patient-centered challenges and better manage the health of the defined populations served by these organizations.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>To foster teamwork, enhance empowerment, and improve the patient care environment, Operations Councils led by trained front-line staff were deployed in 15 clinical areas at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) as a performance improvement tool.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Standardized training of Council facilitators was designed and implemented to guide the performance improvement process. Balanced scorecards were developed in each Council based on the risks and concerns of that particular clinical area. After initial implementation of the Operations Councils, patient safety events declined and team engagement improved by over 34% across the medical center; the highest changes were seen in areas where Operations Councils had been deployed. Additionally, outcome metrics including area-specific and system-wide mortality and readmissions improved after implementation.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>We suggest that this type of approach may be an appropriate strategy to consider in other health care organizations as such institutions are challenged to better manage the health of their defined patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"51-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Health Care Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-823120140000016003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:临床一线工作人员在组织中处于最佳位置,以确定患者安全问题并制定解决方案。然而,在传统模式中,安全委员会由高级管理人员领导,他们在临床上并不对患者负责。这种自上而下的方法可能导致错失解决以患者为中心的挑战和更好地管理这些组织所服务的特定人群健康的机会。设计/方法/方法:为了促进团队合作、增强授权和改善病人护理环境,在俄亥俄州立大学韦克斯纳医学中心(OSUWMC)的15个临床领域部署了由训练有素的一线工作人员领导的业务委员会,作为绩效改进工具。调查结果:设计和实施了理事会协调员的标准化培训,以指导绩效改进过程。每个理事会根据该特定临床领域的风险和关切制定了平衡计分卡。在初步实施业务委员会后,整个医疗中心的患者安全事件减少了,团队参与度提高了34%以上;在部署了行动委员会的地区变化最大。此外,结果指标包括特定地区和系统范围的死亡率和再入院率在实施后得到改善。原创性/价值:我们建议,这类方法可能是其他医疗机构考虑的适当策略,因为这些机构面临着更好地管理其确定的患者群体健康的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging the health care team through Operations Councils: strategies to improve population health from within.

Purpose: Clinical front-line staff are best positioned within the organizations to identify patient safety problems and craft solutions. However, in traditional models, safety committees are led by senior executives who are not clinically responsible for patients. This top-down approach can result in missed opportunities to address patient-centered challenges and better manage the health of the defined populations served by these organizations.

Design/methodology/approach: To foster teamwork, enhance empowerment, and improve the patient care environment, Operations Councils led by trained front-line staff were deployed in 15 clinical areas at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (OSUWMC) as a performance improvement tool.

Findings: Standardized training of Council facilitators was designed and implemented to guide the performance improvement process. Balanced scorecards were developed in each Council based on the risks and concerns of that particular clinical area. After initial implementation of the Operations Councils, patient safety events declined and team engagement improved by over 34% across the medical center; the highest changes were seen in areas where Operations Councils had been deployed. Additionally, outcome metrics including area-specific and system-wide mortality and readmissions improved after implementation.

Originality/value: We suggest that this type of approach may be an appropriate strategy to consider in other health care organizations as such institutions are challenged to better manage the health of their defined patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信