使用固体剂型的品牌药和仿制药之间的差异:体外溶出度测试

Mubarak Nasser Al Ameri , Nanda Nayuni , K.G. Anil Kumar , David Perrett , Arthur Tucker , Atholl Johnston
{"title":"使用固体剂型的品牌药和仿制药之间的差异:体外溶出度测试","authors":"Mubarak Nasser Al Ameri ,&nbsp;Nanda Nayuni ,&nbsp;K.G. Anil Kumar ,&nbsp;David Perrett ,&nbsp;Arthur Tucker ,&nbsp;Atholl Johnston","doi":"10.1016/j.rinphs.2011.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Dissolution is the amount of substance that goes into solution per unit time under standardised conditions of liquid/solid interface, solvent composition and temperature. Dissolution is one of the most important tools to predict the <em>in-vivo</em> bioavailability and in some cases to determine bioequivalence and assure interchangeability.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To compare the differences in dissolution behaviour of solid dosage forms between innovators (reference products) and their generic counterparts (tested products).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four replicates for each batch of 37 tested medicines was carried out using A PT-DT70 dissolution tester from Pharma Test. A total of 13 branded medicines and 24 generic counterparts were obtained locally and internationally to detect any differences in their dissolution behaviour. They were tested according to the British Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia and the US Pharmacopeia with the rate of dissolution determined by ultra-violet Spectrophotometery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most tested medicines complied with the pharmacopoeial specifications and achieved 85% dissolution in 60<!--> <!-->min. However, some generic medicines showed significant differences in dissolution rate at 60 and 120<!--> <!-->min. Many generic medicines showed a slower dissolution rate than their branded counterparts such as the generic forms of omeprazole 20<!--> <!-->mg. Some showed an incomplete dissolution such as the generic form of nifedipine 10<!--> <!-->mg. Other generics showed faster dissolution rate than their branded counterpart such as the generic forms of meloxicam 15<!--> <!-->mg. Moreover, some generics from different batches of the same manufacturer showed significant differences in their dissolution rate such as the generic forms of meloxicam 7.5<!--> <!-->mg. Nevertheless, some generic medicines violated the EMA and the FDA guidelines for industry when they failed to achieve 85% dissolution at 60<!--> <!-->min, such as the generic form of diclofenac sodium 50<!--> <!-->mg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most medicines in this study complied with the pharmacopeial limits. However, some generics dissolved differently than their branded counterparts. This can clearly question the interchangeability between the branded and its generic counterpart or even among generics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":89718,"journal":{"name":"Results in pharma sciences","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rinphs.2011.12.001","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The differences between the branded and generic medicines using solid dosage forms: In-vitro dissolution testing\",\"authors\":\"Mubarak Nasser Al Ameri ,&nbsp;Nanda Nayuni ,&nbsp;K.G. Anil Kumar ,&nbsp;David Perrett ,&nbsp;Arthur Tucker ,&nbsp;Atholl Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rinphs.2011.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Dissolution is the amount of substance that goes into solution per unit time under standardised conditions of liquid/solid interface, solvent composition and temperature. Dissolution is one of the most important tools to predict the <em>in-vivo</em> bioavailability and in some cases to determine bioequivalence and assure interchangeability.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To compare the differences in dissolution behaviour of solid dosage forms between innovators (reference products) and their generic counterparts (tested products).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Four replicates for each batch of 37 tested medicines was carried out using A PT-DT70 dissolution tester from Pharma Test. A total of 13 branded medicines and 24 generic counterparts were obtained locally and internationally to detect any differences in their dissolution behaviour. They were tested according to the British Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia and the US Pharmacopeia with the rate of dissolution determined by ultra-violet Spectrophotometery.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most tested medicines complied with the pharmacopoeial specifications and achieved 85% dissolution in 60<!--> <!-->min. However, some generic medicines showed significant differences in dissolution rate at 60 and 120<!--> <!-->min. Many generic medicines showed a slower dissolution rate than their branded counterparts such as the generic forms of omeprazole 20<!--> <!-->mg. Some showed an incomplete dissolution such as the generic form of nifedipine 10<!--> <!-->mg. Other generics showed faster dissolution rate than their branded counterpart such as the generic forms of meloxicam 15<!--> <!-->mg. Moreover, some generics from different batches of the same manufacturer showed significant differences in their dissolution rate such as the generic forms of meloxicam 7.5<!--> <!-->mg. Nevertheless, some generic medicines violated the EMA and the FDA guidelines for industry when they failed to achieve 85% dissolution at 60<!--> <!-->min, such as the generic form of diclofenac sodium 50<!--> <!-->mg.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Most medicines in this study complied with the pharmacopeial limits. However, some generics dissolved differently than their branded counterparts. This can clearly question the interchangeability between the branded and its generic counterpart or even among generics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Results in pharma sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rinphs.2011.12.001\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Results in pharma sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211286311000157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in pharma sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211286311000157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

溶出度是指在标准的液/固界面、溶剂组成和温度条件下,单位时间内进入溶液的物质量。溶出度是预测体内生物利用度的最重要工具之一,在某些情况下还可以确定生物等效性和确保互换性。目的比较创新产品(参考产品)和仿制产品(测试产品)之间固体剂型溶出行为的差异。方法采用药学检验公司PT-DT70溶出度仪对37种药物进行4个重复。在本地和国际上共取得13种品牌药物和24种仿制药,以检测其溶出行为的差异。根据英国药典、欧洲药典和美国药典进行测试,用紫外分光光度法测定溶出率。结果大多数被试药物在60 min内溶出度达到85%,但部分仿制药在60 min和120 min溶出度存在显著差异,许多仿制药的溶出度低于品牌药,如奥美拉唑仿制药20mg。有些显示不完全溶解,如一般形式的硝苯地平10毫克。其他仿制药的溶出速度也比品牌药快,比如仿制的美洛昔康15毫克。此外,同一厂家不同批次的仿制药在溶出率上存在显著差异,如美洛昔康仿制药7.5 mg。然而,一些仿制药在60分钟溶出度达不到85%时违反了EMA和FDA的行业指南,例如双氯芬酸钠50mg的仿制药。结论本研究大部分药物符合药典标准。然而,一些仿制药的溶解效果与品牌药不同。这可以清楚地质疑品牌和仿制药之间甚至仿制药之间的互换性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The differences between the branded and generic medicines using solid dosage forms: In-vitro dissolution testing

The differences between the branded and generic medicines using solid dosage forms: In-vitro dissolution testing

Introduction

Dissolution is the amount of substance that goes into solution per unit time under standardised conditions of liquid/solid interface, solvent composition and temperature. Dissolution is one of the most important tools to predict the in-vivo bioavailability and in some cases to determine bioequivalence and assure interchangeability.

Aim

To compare the differences in dissolution behaviour of solid dosage forms between innovators (reference products) and their generic counterparts (tested products).

Methods

Four replicates for each batch of 37 tested medicines was carried out using A PT-DT70 dissolution tester from Pharma Test. A total of 13 branded medicines and 24 generic counterparts were obtained locally and internationally to detect any differences in their dissolution behaviour. They were tested according to the British Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia and the US Pharmacopeia with the rate of dissolution determined by ultra-violet Spectrophotometery.

Results

Most tested medicines complied with the pharmacopoeial specifications and achieved 85% dissolution in 60 min. However, some generic medicines showed significant differences in dissolution rate at 60 and 120 min. Many generic medicines showed a slower dissolution rate than their branded counterparts such as the generic forms of omeprazole 20 mg. Some showed an incomplete dissolution such as the generic form of nifedipine 10 mg. Other generics showed faster dissolution rate than their branded counterpart such as the generic forms of meloxicam 15 mg. Moreover, some generics from different batches of the same manufacturer showed significant differences in their dissolution rate such as the generic forms of meloxicam 7.5 mg. Nevertheless, some generic medicines violated the EMA and the FDA guidelines for industry when they failed to achieve 85% dissolution at 60 min, such as the generic form of diclofenac sodium 50 mg.

Conclusion

Most medicines in this study complied with the pharmacopeial limits. However, some generics dissolved differently than their branded counterparts. This can clearly question the interchangeability between the branded and its generic counterpart or even among generics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信