Maria Co Lordello, Carolina C Ambrogini, Ana L Fanganiello, Teresa R Embiruçu, Marina M Zaneti, Laise Veloso, Livia B Piccirillo, Bianca L Crude, Mauro Haidar, Ivaldo Silva
{"title":"自尊/自我形象女性性(SESIFS)问卷的编制与验证。","authors":"Maria Co Lordello, Carolina C Ambrogini, Ana L Fanganiello, Teresa R Embiruçu, Marina M Zaneti, Laise Veloso, Livia B Piccirillo, Bianca L Crude, Mauro Haidar, Ivaldo Silva","doi":"10.4137/CMWH.S19182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-esteem and self-image are psychological aspects that affect sexual function.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To validate a new measurement tool that correlates the concepts of self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 20-question test (the self-esteem/self-image female sexuality [SESIFS] questionnaire) was created and tested on 208 women. Participants answered: Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, the female sexual quotient (FSQ), and the SESIFS questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test concurrent validity of the SESIFS against Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and the FSQ. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The new questionnaire had a good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001), but the sexual domain scored lower than expected (r = 0.65). The validity was good: overall score r = 0.38, p < 0.001, self-esteem domain r = 0.32, p < 0.001, self-image domain r = 0.31, p < 0.001, sexual domain r = 0.29, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SESIFS questionnaire has limitations in measuring the correlation among self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality domains. A new, revised version is being tested and will be presented in an upcoming publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":90142,"journal":{"name":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","volume":"7 ","pages":"37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CMWH.S19182","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creation and Validation of the Self-esteem/Self-image Female Sexuality (SESIFS) Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Co Lordello, Carolina C Ambrogini, Ana L Fanganiello, Teresa R Embiruçu, Marina M Zaneti, Laise Veloso, Livia B Piccirillo, Bianca L Crude, Mauro Haidar, Ivaldo Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4137/CMWH.S19182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-esteem and self-image are psychological aspects that affect sexual function.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To validate a new measurement tool that correlates the concepts of self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 20-question test (the self-esteem/self-image female sexuality [SESIFS] questionnaire) was created and tested on 208 women. Participants answered: Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, the female sexual quotient (FSQ), and the SESIFS questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test concurrent validity of the SESIFS against Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and the FSQ. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The new questionnaire had a good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001), but the sexual domain scored lower than expected (r = 0.65). The validity was good: overall score r = 0.38, p < 0.001, self-esteem domain r = 0.32, p < 0.001, self-image domain r = 0.31, p < 0.001, sexual domain r = 0.29, p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SESIFS questionnaire has limitations in measuring the correlation among self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality domains. A new, revised version is being tested and will be presented in an upcoming publication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"37-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/CMWH.S19182\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMWH.S19182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical medicine insights. Women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/CMWH.S19182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
自尊和自我形象是影响性功能的心理方面。目的:验证一种新的测量工具，它将自尊、自我形象和性的概念联系起来。方法:采用自尊/自我形象女性性行为问卷(SESIFS)对208名女性进行问卷调查。参与者回答:罗森博格自尊量表、女性性商(FSQ)和SESIFS问卷。采用Pearson相关系数检验SESIFS与Rosenberg自尊量表和FSQ的并发效度。采用Cronbach’s alpha系数检验信度。结果:新问卷总体信度较好(Cronbach’s alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001)，但性别领域得分低于预期(r = 0.65)。效度较好:总分r = 0.38, p < 0.001，自尊领域r = 0.32, p < 0.001，自我形象领域r = 0.31, p < 0.001，性领域r = 0.29, p < 0.001。结论:SESIFS问卷在测量自尊、自我形象和性取向之间的相关性方面存在局限性。一个新的修订版本正在测试中，并将在即将出版的出版物中提出。
Creation and Validation of the Self-esteem/Self-image Female Sexuality (SESIFS) Questionnaire.
Introduction: Self-esteem and self-image are psychological aspects that affect sexual function.
Aims: To validate a new measurement tool that correlates the concepts of self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality.
Methods: A 20-question test (the self-esteem/self-image female sexuality [SESIFS] questionnaire) was created and tested on 208 women. Participants answered: Rosenberg's self-esteem scale, the female sexual quotient (FSQ), and the SESIFS questionnaire. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test concurrent validity of the SESIFS against Rosenberg's self-esteem scale and the FSQ. Reliability was tested using the Cronbach's alpha coefficient.
Result: The new questionnaire had a good overall reliability (Cronbach's alpha r = 0.862, p < 0.001), but the sexual domain scored lower than expected (r = 0.65). The validity was good: overall score r = 0.38, p < 0.001, self-esteem domain r = 0.32, p < 0.001, self-image domain r = 0.31, p < 0.001, sexual domain r = 0.29, p < 0.001.
Conclusions: The SESIFS questionnaire has limitations in measuring the correlation among self-esteem, self-image, and sexuality domains. A new, revised version is being tested and will be presented in an upcoming publication.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
