Corinne A Labyak, David M Janicke, Crystal S Lim, James Colee, Anne E Mathews
{"title":"人体测量学鉴定超重儿童患心脏代谢疾病的风险最高。","authors":"Corinne A Labyak, David M Janicke, Crystal S Lim, James Colee, Anne E Mathews","doi":"10.1177/1941406413501379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is a novel anthropometric that correlates more strongly with visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and cardiometabolic disease risk in adults compared with body mass index (BMI). However, little research has evaluated this measurement in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate SAD as a measure of cardiometabolic risk compared with other anthropometrics in overweight/obese children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional subset analysis of 8- to 12-year-old overweight/ obese children. SAD was compared to BMI, waist circumference (WC), BMI <i>z</i>-score, and percent body fat to determine which measurement was most closely associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. A total cardiometabolic risk score comprising all biochemical markers and blood pressure was also compared to these same anthropometrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overweight/obese children (n = 145, mean age 10 ± 1.4 years, mean BMI percentile 97.9 ± 0.02) were included in the analysis. SAD correlated with the greatest number of biochemical markers/blood pressure values including triglycerides (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03), HgbA1c (<i>r</i> = .21, <i>P</i> = .01), and systolic blood pressure (<i>r</i> = .38, <i>P</i> < .0001). SAD was more strongly correlated to total risk score (<i>r</i> = .25, <i>P</i> = .002) than WC (<i>r</i> = .22, <i>P</i> = .006), BMI (<i>r</i> = .17, <i>P</i> = .04), BMI-<i>z</i> (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03), and percent body fat (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate SAD in overweight/obese American children as a marker of cardiometabolic disease risk. The results suggest a slightly stronger correlation between SAD and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese children; however, all correlations were weak. As this was a pilot study, additional research is needed prior to recommending the use of this measurement in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":89385,"journal":{"name":"Infant, child & adolescent nutrition","volume":"5 6","pages":"341-346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1941406413501379","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthropometrics to Identify Overweight Children at Most Risk for the Development of Cardiometabolic Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Corinne A Labyak, David M Janicke, Crystal S Lim, James Colee, Anne E Mathews\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1941406413501379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is a novel anthropometric that correlates more strongly with visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and cardiometabolic disease risk in adults compared with body mass index (BMI). However, little research has evaluated this measurement in children.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate SAD as a measure of cardiometabolic risk compared with other anthropometrics in overweight/obese children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a cross-sectional subset analysis of 8- to 12-year-old overweight/ obese children. SAD was compared to BMI, waist circumference (WC), BMI <i>z</i>-score, and percent body fat to determine which measurement was most closely associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. A total cardiometabolic risk score comprising all biochemical markers and blood pressure was also compared to these same anthropometrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overweight/obese children (n = 145, mean age 10 ± 1.4 years, mean BMI percentile 97.9 ± 0.02) were included in the analysis. SAD correlated with the greatest number of biochemical markers/blood pressure values including triglycerides (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03), HgbA1c (<i>r</i> = .21, <i>P</i> = .01), and systolic blood pressure (<i>r</i> = .38, <i>P</i> < .0001). SAD was more strongly correlated to total risk score (<i>r</i> = .25, <i>P</i> = .002) than WC (<i>r</i> = .22, <i>P</i> = .006), BMI (<i>r</i> = .17, <i>P</i> = .04), BMI-<i>z</i> (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03), and percent body fat (<i>r</i> = .18, <i>P</i> = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate SAD in overweight/obese American children as a marker of cardiometabolic disease risk. The results suggest a slightly stronger correlation between SAD and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese children; however, all correlations were weak. As this was a pilot study, additional research is needed prior to recommending the use of this measurement in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant, child & adolescent nutrition\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"341-346\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1941406413501379\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant, child & adolescent nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1941406413501379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant, child & adolescent nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1941406413501379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
背景:与体重指数(BMI)相比,矢状腹直径(SAD)是一种新的人体测量指标,与成人内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和心脏代谢疾病风险的相关性更强。然而,很少有研究对儿童的这种测量进行评估。目的:评价SAD作为超重/肥胖儿童心脏代谢风险的测量指标与其他人体测量指标的比较。方法:本研究对8- 12岁超重/肥胖儿童进行横断面亚组分析。将SAD与BMI、腰围(WC)、BMI z-score和体脂百分比进行比较,以确定哪种测量与心脏代谢危险因素最密切相关。包括所有生化指标和血压在内的总心脏代谢风险评分也与这些相同的人体测量值进行了比较。结果:145名超重/肥胖儿童(n = 145,平均年龄10±1.4岁,平均BMI百分位数97.9±0.02)纳入分析。SAD与最大数量的生化标志物/血压值相关,包括甘油三酯(r = 0.18, P = 0.03)、糖化血红蛋白(r = 0.21, P = 0.01)和收缩压(r = 0.38, P < 0.0001)。SAD与总危险评分(r = 0.25, P = 0.002)的相关性高于WC (r = 0.22, P = 0.006)、BMI (r = 0.17, P = 0.04)、BMI-z (r = 0.18, P = 0.03)和体脂率(r = 0.18, P = 0.03)。结论:这是第一个评估美国超重/肥胖儿童SAD作为心脏代谢疾病风险标志的研究。结果表明,在超重/肥胖儿童中,SAD与心脏代谢危险因素之间的相关性略强;然而,所有的相关性都很弱。由于这是一项初步研究,在推荐在临床实践中使用该测量方法之前,需要进行更多的研究。
Anthropometrics to Identify Overweight Children at Most Risk for the Development of Cardiometabolic Disease.
Background: Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is a novel anthropometric that correlates more strongly with visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and cardiometabolic disease risk in adults compared with body mass index (BMI). However, little research has evaluated this measurement in children.
Objective: To evaluate SAD as a measure of cardiometabolic risk compared with other anthropometrics in overweight/obese children.
Methods: This study was a cross-sectional subset analysis of 8- to 12-year-old overweight/ obese children. SAD was compared to BMI, waist circumference (WC), BMI z-score, and percent body fat to determine which measurement was most closely associated with cardiometabolic risk factors. A total cardiometabolic risk score comprising all biochemical markers and blood pressure was also compared to these same anthropometrics.
Results: Overweight/obese children (n = 145, mean age 10 ± 1.4 years, mean BMI percentile 97.9 ± 0.02) were included in the analysis. SAD correlated with the greatest number of biochemical markers/blood pressure values including triglycerides (r = .18, P = .03), HgbA1c (r = .21, P = .01), and systolic blood pressure (r = .38, P < .0001). SAD was more strongly correlated to total risk score (r = .25, P = .002) than WC (r = .22, P = .006), BMI (r = .17, P = .04), BMI-z (r = .18, P = .03), and percent body fat (r = .18, P = .03).
Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate SAD in overweight/obese American children as a marker of cardiometabolic disease risk. The results suggest a slightly stronger correlation between SAD and cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese children; however, all correlations were weak. As this was a pilot study, additional research is needed prior to recommending the use of this measurement in clinical practice.