机器人义肢替代控制方法的介绍和测试。

Q3 Medicine
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2014-10-30 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874120701408010093
Lauren Griggs, Farbod Fahimi
{"title":"机器人义肢替代控制方法的介绍和测试。","authors":"Lauren Griggs,&nbsp;Farbod Fahimi","doi":"10.2174/1874120701408010093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Commercially available robotic prosthetic arms currently use independent joint control. An alternative controller involving only control of the hand in a Cartesian frame rather than controlling each joint independently is proposed and tested. An experimental 4DOF robotic arm was used as the platform for testing the proposed control approach. As opposed to joint control, Cartesian control requires the solution to the inverse kinematics problem. The inverse kinematics solution was developed for the robotic arm using the extended Jacobian method. The two control methodologies, joint control and Cartesian control, were tested on five able-bodied human subjects. Improvement of one control methodology over the other was measured by the time it took for the subjects to complete a simple motor task. The timed trial results indicated that Cartesian control was both more intuitive and more effective than joint control. So, the results suggest that much improvement can be achieved by using the proposed Cartesian control methodology. </p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"8 ","pages":"93-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701408010093","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction and testing of an alternative control approach for a robotic prosthetic arm.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Griggs,&nbsp;Farbod Fahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701408010093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Commercially available robotic prosthetic arms currently use independent joint control. An alternative controller involving only control of the hand in a Cartesian frame rather than controlling each joint independently is proposed and tested. An experimental 4DOF robotic arm was used as the platform for testing the proposed control approach. As opposed to joint control, Cartesian control requires the solution to the inverse kinematics problem. The inverse kinematics solution was developed for the robotic arm using the extended Jacobian method. The two control methodologies, joint control and Cartesian control, were tested on five able-bodied human subjects. Improvement of one control methodology over the other was measured by the time it took for the subjects to complete a simple motor task. The timed trial results indicated that Cartesian control was both more intuitive and more effective than joint control. So, the results suggest that much improvement can be achieved by using the proposed Cartesian control methodology. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"93-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874120701408010093\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前商用机器人假肢臂采用独立关节控制。提出并测试了一种替代控制器,该控制器只涉及在笛卡尔坐标系中控制手,而不是独立控制每个关节。以实验四自由度机械臂为平台,对所提出的控制方法进行了测试。与关节控制相反,笛卡尔控制要求解逆运动学问题。采用扩展雅可比矩阵法建立了机械臂的运动学逆解。两种控制方法,关节控制和笛卡尔控制,在五名健全的人类受试者身上进行了测试。通过受试者完成一项简单运动任务所需的时间来衡量一种控制方法相对于另一种控制方法的改进。计时试验结果表明,笛卡尔控制比关节控制更直观、更有效。因此,结果表明,使用所提出的笛卡尔控制方法可以取得很大的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Introduction and testing of an alternative control approach for a robotic prosthetic arm.

Introduction and testing of an alternative control approach for a robotic prosthetic arm.

Introduction and testing of an alternative control approach for a robotic prosthetic arm.

Introduction and testing of an alternative control approach for a robotic prosthetic arm.

Commercially available robotic prosthetic arms currently use independent joint control. An alternative controller involving only control of the hand in a Cartesian frame rather than controlling each joint independently is proposed and tested. An experimental 4DOF robotic arm was used as the platform for testing the proposed control approach. As opposed to joint control, Cartesian control requires the solution to the inverse kinematics problem. The inverse kinematics solution was developed for the robotic arm using the extended Jacobian method. The two control methodologies, joint control and Cartesian control, were tested on five able-bodied human subjects. Improvement of one control methodology over the other was measured by the time it took for the subjects to complete a simple motor task. The timed trial results indicated that Cartesian control was both more intuitive and more effective than joint control. So, the results suggest that much improvement can be achieved by using the proposed Cartesian control methodology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信