{"title":"连续监测木烟细颗粒物的校正系数。","authors":"Marcy L McNamara, Curtis W Noonan, Tony J Ward","doi":"10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a handful of instruments as Federal Reference or Federal Equivalency Methods (FRM and FEM, respectively) for the monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). More commonly used for indoor exposure assessment studies are optical scanning devices such as the DustTrak (TSI) due to the their portability and affordability. It is recommended by the manufacturer of these instruments that a \"correction factor\" be applied when assessing source-specific conditions. In this study, DustTraks were collocated with multiple samplers in various environments in an effort to establish an indoor, wood smoke-source specific correction factor. The DustTrak was found to report PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels on average 1.6 times higher than a filter based method in two indoor sampling programs. The DustTrak also reported indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations 1.7 times higher than a FRM sampler during a regional forest fire event. These real-world scenarios give a correction factor within a reasonable range of the results of a controlled laboratory experiment in which DustTraks reported PM<sub>2.5</sub> approximately 2 times higher than a FEM. Our indoor wood smoke-specific correction factor of 1.65 will allow for DustTraks to be confidently used in quantifying PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures within indoor environments predominantly impacted by wood smoke.</p>","PeriodicalId":7402,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","volume":"11 3","pages":"315-322"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214921/pdf/nihms344195.pdf","citationCount":"92","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction factor for continuous monitoring of wood smoke fine particulate matter.\",\"authors\":\"Marcy L McNamara, Curtis W Noonan, Tony J Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a handful of instruments as Federal Reference or Federal Equivalency Methods (FRM and FEM, respectively) for the monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). More commonly used for indoor exposure assessment studies are optical scanning devices such as the DustTrak (TSI) due to the their portability and affordability. It is recommended by the manufacturer of these instruments that a \\\"correction factor\\\" be applied when assessing source-specific conditions. In this study, DustTraks were collocated with multiple samplers in various environments in an effort to establish an indoor, wood smoke-source specific correction factor. The DustTrak was found to report PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels on average 1.6 times higher than a filter based method in two indoor sampling programs. The DustTrak also reported indoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations 1.7 times higher than a FRM sampler during a regional forest fire event. These real-world scenarios give a correction factor within a reasonable range of the results of a controlled laboratory experiment in which DustTraks reported PM<sub>2.5</sub> approximately 2 times higher than a FEM. Our indoor wood smoke-specific correction factor of 1.65 will allow for DustTraks to be confidently used in quantifying PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures within indoor environments predominantly impacted by wood smoke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerosol and Air Quality Research\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"315-322\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214921/pdf/nihms344195.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"92\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerosol and Air Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.08.0072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction factor for continuous monitoring of wood smoke fine particulate matter.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has designated a handful of instruments as Federal Reference or Federal Equivalency Methods (FRM and FEM, respectively) for the monitoring of fine particulate matter (PM2.5). More commonly used for indoor exposure assessment studies are optical scanning devices such as the DustTrak (TSI) due to the their portability and affordability. It is recommended by the manufacturer of these instruments that a "correction factor" be applied when assessing source-specific conditions. In this study, DustTraks were collocated with multiple samplers in various environments in an effort to establish an indoor, wood smoke-source specific correction factor. The DustTrak was found to report PM2.5 levels on average 1.6 times higher than a filter based method in two indoor sampling programs. The DustTrak also reported indoor PM2.5 concentrations 1.7 times higher than a FRM sampler during a regional forest fire event. These real-world scenarios give a correction factor within a reasonable range of the results of a controlled laboratory experiment in which DustTraks reported PM2.5 approximately 2 times higher than a FEM. Our indoor wood smoke-specific correction factor of 1.65 will allow for DustTraks to be confidently used in quantifying PM2.5 exposures within indoor environments predominantly impacted by wood smoke.
期刊介绍:
The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues. It encompasses a multi-disciplinary field, including:
- Aerosol, air quality, atmospheric chemistry and global change;
- Air toxics (hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)) - Sources, control, transport and fate, human exposure;
- Nanoparticle and nanotechnology;
- Sources, combustion, thermal decomposition, emission, properties, behavior, formation, transport, deposition, measurement and analysis;
- Effects on the environments;
- Air quality and human health;
- Bioaerosols;
- Indoor air quality;
- Energy and air pollution;
- Pollution control technologies;
- Invention and improvement of sampling instruments and technologies;
- Optical/radiative properties and remote sensing;
- Carbon dioxide emission, capture, storage and utilization; novel methods for the reduction of carbon dioxide emission;
- Other topics related to aerosol and air quality.