睡眠环境下抑郁情绪评估量表的可靠性。

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Brandy M Roane, Ronald Seifer, Katherine M Sharkey, Eliza Van Reen, Tamara L Y Bond, Tifenn Raffray, Mary A Carskadon
{"title":"睡眠环境下抑郁情绪评估量表的可靠性。","authors":"Brandy M Roane,&nbsp;Ronald Seifer,&nbsp;Katherine M Sharkey,&nbsp;Eliza Van Reen,&nbsp;Tamara L Y Bond,&nbsp;Tifenn Raffray,&nbsp;Mary A Carskadon","doi":"10.4473/TPM20.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study assessed the reliability of Kandel & Davies mood scale with and without sleep-related items. 178 Brown University first-year students (mean age=18.1 years; 108 females) completed online biweekly surveys after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 and on 2 consecutive days after weeks 4 and 12 of their first semester. The scale was examined as a 1) full 6-item scale, 2) 5-item scale excluding the sleep item, and 3) 4-item scale excluding the sleep and tired items. Intraclass correlations (ICC) values for consecutive-day assessments and 6 biweekly surveys were similar and not a function of the weeks evaluated. Total-item correlations and inter-measure correlations with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depressed Mood Scale (CES-D) supported the removal of the sleep-related items from the 6-item scale. These analyses confirm the reliability of the original Kandel and Davies depressed mood scale as well as without the sleep-related items.</p>","PeriodicalId":46266,"journal":{"name":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","volume":"20 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206909/pdf/nihms598445.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of a Scale Assessing Depressed Mood in the Context of Sleep.\",\"authors\":\"Brandy M Roane,&nbsp;Ronald Seifer,&nbsp;Katherine M Sharkey,&nbsp;Eliza Van Reen,&nbsp;Tamara L Y Bond,&nbsp;Tifenn Raffray,&nbsp;Mary A Carskadon\",\"doi\":\"10.4473/TPM20.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current study assessed the reliability of Kandel & Davies mood scale with and without sleep-related items. 178 Brown University first-year students (mean age=18.1 years; 108 females) completed online biweekly surveys after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 and on 2 consecutive days after weeks 4 and 12 of their first semester. The scale was examined as a 1) full 6-item scale, 2) 5-item scale excluding the sleep item, and 3) 4-item scale excluding the sleep and tired items. Intraclass correlations (ICC) values for consecutive-day assessments and 6 biweekly surveys were similar and not a function of the weeks evaluated. Total-item correlations and inter-measure correlations with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depressed Mood Scale (CES-D) supported the removal of the sleep-related items from the 6-item scale. These analyses confirm the reliability of the original Kandel and Davies depressed mood scale as well as without the sleep-related items.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"3-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4206909/pdf/nihms598445.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TPM-Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM20.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前的研究评估了坎德尔和戴维斯情绪量表的可靠性,包括和不包括与睡眠有关的项目。布朗大学一年级学生178名(平均年龄18.1岁;108名女性)在第2周、第6周、第8周和第10周以及第一学期第4周和第12周后连续两天完成了每两周一次的在线调查。量表采用1)完整的6项量表,2)不含睡眠项的5项量表,3)不含睡眠和疲劳项的4项量表。连续一天评估和6个双周调查的类内相关性(ICC)值相似,不是评估周的函数。与流行病学研究中心抑郁情绪量表(CES-D)的总项目相关性和测量间相关性支持从6项量表中删除与睡眠相关的项目。这些分析证实了最初的坎德尔和戴维斯抑郁情绪量表的可靠性,以及没有睡眠相关项目的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of a Scale Assessing Depressed Mood in the Context of Sleep.

The current study assessed the reliability of Kandel & Davies mood scale with and without sleep-related items. 178 Brown University first-year students (mean age=18.1 years; 108 females) completed online biweekly surveys after weeks 2, 6, 8, and 10 and on 2 consecutive days after weeks 4 and 12 of their first semester. The scale was examined as a 1) full 6-item scale, 2) 5-item scale excluding the sleep item, and 3) 4-item scale excluding the sleep and tired items. Intraclass correlations (ICC) values for consecutive-day assessments and 6 biweekly surveys were similar and not a function of the weeks evaluated. Total-item correlations and inter-measure correlations with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depressed Mood Scale (CES-D) supported the removal of the sleep-related items from the 6-item scale. These analyses confirm the reliability of the original Kandel and Davies depressed mood scale as well as without the sleep-related items.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信