Melinda B Chu, Jordan B Slutsky, Maulik M Dhandha, Brandon T Beal, Eric S Armbrecht, Ronald J Walker, Mark A Varvares, Scott W Fosko
{"title":"使用美国癌症分期标准联合委员会和国家综合癌症网络指南评估“高风险”皮肤鳞状细胞癌的定义。","authors":"Melinda B Chu, Jordan B Slutsky, Maulik M Dhandha, Brandon T Beal, Eric S Armbrecht, Ronald J Walker, Mark A Varvares, Scott W Fosko","doi":"10.1155/2014/154340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent guidelines from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have been proposed for the assessment of \"high-risk\" cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs). Though different in perspective, both guidelines share the common goals of trying to identify \"high-risk\" cSCCs and improving patient outcomes. Thus, in theory, both definitions should identify a similar proportion of \"high-risk\" tumors. We sought to evaluate the AJCC and NCCN definitions of \"high-risk\" cSCCs and to assess their concordance. Methods. A retrospective review of head and neck cSCCs seen by an academic dermatology department from July 2010 to November 2011 was performed. Results. By AJCC criteria, most tumors (n = 211,82.1%) were of Stage 1; 46 tumors (13.9%) were of Stage 2. Almost all were of Stage 2 due to size alone (≥2 cm); one tumor was \"upstaged\" due to \"high-risk features.\" Using the NCCN taxonomy, 231 (87%) of tumors were \"high-risk.\" Discussion. This analysis demonstrates discordance between AJCC and NCCN definitions of \"high-risk\" cSCC. Few cSCCs are of Stage 2 by AJCC criteria, while most are \"high-risk\" by the NCCN guidelines. While the current guidelines represent significant progress, further studies are needed to generate a unified definition of \"high-risk\" cSCC to optimize management. </p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/154340","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the definitions of \\\"high-risk\\\" cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma using the american joint committee on cancer staging criteria and national comprehensive cancer network guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Melinda B Chu, Jordan B Slutsky, Maulik M Dhandha, Brandon T Beal, Eric S Armbrecht, Ronald J Walker, Mark A Varvares, Scott W Fosko\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/154340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recent guidelines from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have been proposed for the assessment of \\\"high-risk\\\" cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs). Though different in perspective, both guidelines share the common goals of trying to identify \\\"high-risk\\\" cSCCs and improving patient outcomes. Thus, in theory, both definitions should identify a similar proportion of \\\"high-risk\\\" tumors. We sought to evaluate the AJCC and NCCN definitions of \\\"high-risk\\\" cSCCs and to assess their concordance. Methods. A retrospective review of head and neck cSCCs seen by an academic dermatology department from July 2010 to November 2011 was performed. Results. By AJCC criteria, most tumors (n = 211,82.1%) were of Stage 1; 46 tumors (13.9%) were of Stage 2. Almost all were of Stage 2 due to size alone (≥2 cm); one tumor was \\\"upstaged\\\" due to \\\"high-risk features.\\\" Using the NCCN taxonomy, 231 (87%) of tumors were \\\"high-risk.\\\" Discussion. This analysis demonstrates discordance between AJCC and NCCN definitions of \\\"high-risk\\\" cSCC. Few cSCCs are of Stage 2 by AJCC criteria, while most are \\\"high-risk\\\" by the NCCN guidelines. While the current guidelines represent significant progress, further studies are needed to generate a unified definition of \\\"high-risk\\\" cSCC to optimize management. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/154340\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/154340\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/154340","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of the definitions of "high-risk" cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma using the american joint committee on cancer staging criteria and national comprehensive cancer network guidelines.
Recent guidelines from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) have been proposed for the assessment of "high-risk" cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCCs). Though different in perspective, both guidelines share the common goals of trying to identify "high-risk" cSCCs and improving patient outcomes. Thus, in theory, both definitions should identify a similar proportion of "high-risk" tumors. We sought to evaluate the AJCC and NCCN definitions of "high-risk" cSCCs and to assess their concordance. Methods. A retrospective review of head and neck cSCCs seen by an academic dermatology department from July 2010 to November 2011 was performed. Results. By AJCC criteria, most tumors (n = 211,82.1%) were of Stage 1; 46 tumors (13.9%) were of Stage 2. Almost all were of Stage 2 due to size alone (≥2 cm); one tumor was "upstaged" due to "high-risk features." Using the NCCN taxonomy, 231 (87%) of tumors were "high-risk." Discussion. This analysis demonstrates discordance between AJCC and NCCN definitions of "high-risk" cSCC. Few cSCCs are of Stage 2 by AJCC criteria, while most are "high-risk" by the NCCN guidelines. While the current guidelines represent significant progress, further studies are needed to generate a unified definition of "high-risk" cSCC to optimize management.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.