动态生物网络轨迹中微分相互作用的比较识别。

GI-Edition. Proceedings Pub Date : 2009-01-01
Zhengyu Ouyang, Mingzhou Joe Song
{"title":"动态生物网络轨迹中微分相互作用的比较识别。","authors":"Zhengyu Ouyang,&nbsp;Mingzhou Joe Song","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is often challenging to reconstruct accurately a complete dynamic biological network due to the scarcity of data collected in cost-effective experiments. This paper addresses the possibility of comparatively identifying qualitative interaction shifts between two dynamical networks from comparative time course data. An innovative approach is developed to achieve differential interaction detection by <i>statistically</i> comparing the trajectories, instead of <i>numerically</i> comparing the reconstructed interactions. The core of this approach is a statistical heterogeneity test that compares two multiple linear regression equations for the derivatives in nonlinear ordinary differential equations, statistically instead of numerically. In detecting any shift of an interaction, the uncertainty in estimated regression coefficients is taken into account by this test, while it is ignored by the reconstruction-based numerical comparison. The heterogeneity test is accomplished by assessing the gain in goodness-of-fit from using a single common interaction to using a pair of differential interactions. Compared with previous numerical comparison methods, the proposed statistical comparison always achieves higher statistical power. As sample size decreases or noise increases in a certain range, the improvement becomes substantial. The advantage is illustrated by a simulation study on the statistical power as functions of the noise level, the sample size, and the interaction complexity. This method is also capable of detecting interaction shifts in the oscillated and excitable domains of a dynamical system model describing cdc2-cyclin interactions during cell division cycle. Generally, the described approach is applicable to comparing dynamical systems of additive nonlinear ordinary differential equations.</p>","PeriodicalId":90508,"journal":{"name":"GI-Edition. Proceedings","volume":"157 ","pages":"163-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181597/pdf/nihms-158078.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Identification of Differential Interactions from Trajectories of Dynamic Biological Networks.\",\"authors\":\"Zhengyu Ouyang,&nbsp;Mingzhou Joe Song\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It is often challenging to reconstruct accurately a complete dynamic biological network due to the scarcity of data collected in cost-effective experiments. This paper addresses the possibility of comparatively identifying qualitative interaction shifts between two dynamical networks from comparative time course data. An innovative approach is developed to achieve differential interaction detection by <i>statistically</i> comparing the trajectories, instead of <i>numerically</i> comparing the reconstructed interactions. The core of this approach is a statistical heterogeneity test that compares two multiple linear regression equations for the derivatives in nonlinear ordinary differential equations, statistically instead of numerically. In detecting any shift of an interaction, the uncertainty in estimated regression coefficients is taken into account by this test, while it is ignored by the reconstruction-based numerical comparison. The heterogeneity test is accomplished by assessing the gain in goodness-of-fit from using a single common interaction to using a pair of differential interactions. Compared with previous numerical comparison methods, the proposed statistical comparison always achieves higher statistical power. As sample size decreases or noise increases in a certain range, the improvement becomes substantial. The advantage is illustrated by a simulation study on the statistical power as functions of the noise level, the sample size, and the interaction complexity. This method is also capable of detecting interaction shifts in the oscillated and excitable domains of a dynamical system model describing cdc2-cyclin interactions during cell division cycle. Generally, the described approach is applicable to comparing dynamical systems of additive nonlinear ordinary differential equations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GI-Edition. Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"163-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4181597/pdf/nihms-158078.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GI-Edition. Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GI-Edition. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于成本效益高的实验中收集的数据稀缺,准确地重建完整的动态生物网络往往具有挑战性。本文讨论了从比较时间过程数据中比较识别两个动态网络之间质的相互作用转移的可能性。提出了一种新颖的方法,通过统计比较轨迹来实现差分相互作用检测,而不是通过数值比较重建的相互作用。该方法的核心是一个统计异质性检验,比较两个多元线性回归方程的导数在非线性常微分方程,统计而不是数值。在检测相互作用的任何移动时,该测试考虑了估计回归系数的不确定性,而基于重建的数值比较忽略了不确定性。异质性检验是通过评估从使用单个普通相互作用到使用一对微分相互作用的拟合优度增益来完成的。与以往的数值比较方法相比,所提出的统计比较总能达到更高的统计功效。随着样本量的减少或噪声在一定范围内的增加,改进变得实质性。通过对统计功率随噪声水平、样本量和相互作用复杂度的函数的仿真研究,说明了该方法的优点。该方法还能够检测描述细胞分裂周期中cdc2-cyclin相互作用的动态系统模型的振荡和可激域中的相互作用位移。一般来说,所描述的方法适用于加性非线性常微分方程动力系统的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Identification of Differential Interactions from Trajectories of Dynamic Biological Networks.

It is often challenging to reconstruct accurately a complete dynamic biological network due to the scarcity of data collected in cost-effective experiments. This paper addresses the possibility of comparatively identifying qualitative interaction shifts between two dynamical networks from comparative time course data. An innovative approach is developed to achieve differential interaction detection by statistically comparing the trajectories, instead of numerically comparing the reconstructed interactions. The core of this approach is a statistical heterogeneity test that compares two multiple linear regression equations for the derivatives in nonlinear ordinary differential equations, statistically instead of numerically. In detecting any shift of an interaction, the uncertainty in estimated regression coefficients is taken into account by this test, while it is ignored by the reconstruction-based numerical comparison. The heterogeneity test is accomplished by assessing the gain in goodness-of-fit from using a single common interaction to using a pair of differential interactions. Compared with previous numerical comparison methods, the proposed statistical comparison always achieves higher statistical power. As sample size decreases or noise increases in a certain range, the improvement becomes substantial. The advantage is illustrated by a simulation study on the statistical power as functions of the noise level, the sample size, and the interaction complexity. This method is also capable of detecting interaction shifts in the oscillated and excitable domains of a dynamical system model describing cdc2-cyclin interactions during cell division cycle. Generally, the described approach is applicable to comparing dynamical systems of additive nonlinear ordinary differential equations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信