用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的显微椎间盘切除术:对再次手术和长期疗效的评估。

Alexander Aichmair, Jerry Y Du, Jennifer Shue, Gisberto Evangelisti, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes, Darren R Lebl, Jayme C Burket, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi
{"title":"用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症的显微椎间盘切除术:对再次手术和长期疗效的评估。","authors":"Alexander Aichmair, Jerry Y Du, Jennifer Shue, Gisberto Evangelisti, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes, Darren R Lebl, Jayme C Burket, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi","doi":"10.1055/s-0034-1386750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Design Retrospective case series. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the reoperation rate after microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up and identify demographic, perioperative, and outcome-related differences between patients with and without a reoperation. Methods The medical records, operative reports, and office notes of patients who had undergone microdiscectomy at a single institution between March 1994 and December 2007 were reviewed and long-term follow-up was assessed via a telephone questionnaire. Results Forty patients (M:24, F:16) with an average age at surgery of 39.9 ± 12.5 years (range: 18-80) underwent microdiscectomy at the levels L5-S1 (n = 28, 70%), L4-L5 (n = 9, 22.5%), L3-L4 (n = 2, 5.0%), and L1-L2 (n = 1, 2.5%). After an average of 40.4 ± 40.1 months (range: 1-128), 25% of patients (10/40) required further spine surgery related to the initial microdiscectomy. At an average postoperative follow-up of 11.1 ± 4.0 years (range: 5-19), additional symptoms apart from back and leg pain were reported more frequently by patients who underwent a reoperation (p = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in patients who did not undergo a reoperation (p = 0.041). For the Oswestry disability index, pain intensity (p = 0.036), and pain-related sleep disturbances (p = 0.006) were reported to be more severe in the reoperation group. Conclusions Microdiscectomy for the treatment of LDH results in a favorable long-term outcome in the majority of cases. The reoperation rate was higher in our series than reported in previous investigations with shorter follow-up. Although there were no statistically significant pre-/perioperative differences between patients with and without reoperation, our findings suggest a difference in self-reported long-term outcome measures. </p>","PeriodicalId":89675,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","volume":"5 2","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Aichmair, Jerry Y Du, Jennifer Shue, Gisberto Evangelisti, Andrew A Sama, Alexander P Hughes, Darren R Lebl, Jayme C Burket, Frank P Cammisa, Federico P Girardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0034-1386750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Design Retrospective case series. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the reoperation rate after microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up and identify demographic, perioperative, and outcome-related differences between patients with and without a reoperation. Methods The medical records, operative reports, and office notes of patients who had undergone microdiscectomy at a single institution between March 1994 and December 2007 were reviewed and long-term follow-up was assessed via a telephone questionnaire. Results Forty patients (M:24, F:16) with an average age at surgery of 39.9 ± 12.5 years (range: 18-80) underwent microdiscectomy at the levels L5-S1 (n = 28, 70%), L4-L5 (n = 9, 22.5%), L3-L4 (n = 2, 5.0%), and L1-L2 (n = 1, 2.5%). After an average of 40.4 ± 40.1 months (range: 1-128), 25% of patients (10/40) required further spine surgery related to the initial microdiscectomy. At an average postoperative follow-up of 11.1 ± 4.0 years (range: 5-19), additional symptoms apart from back and leg pain were reported more frequently by patients who underwent a reoperation (p = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in patients who did not undergo a reoperation (p = 0.041). For the Oswestry disability index, pain intensity (p = 0.036), and pain-related sleep disturbances (p = 0.006) were reported to be more severe in the reoperation group. Conclusions Microdiscectomy for the treatment of LDH results in a favorable long-term outcome in the majority of cases. The reoperation rate was higher in our series than reported in previous investigations with shorter follow-up. Although there were no statistically significant pre-/perioperative differences between patients with and without reoperation, our findings suggest a difference in self-reported long-term outcome measures. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based spine-care journal\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"77-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4174230/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based spine-care journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1386750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based spine-care journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1386750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计 回顾性病例系列。目的 本研究旨在评估腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)显微椎间盘切除术后随访 5 年以上患者的再次手术率,并确定再次手术和未再次手术患者在人口统计学、围手术期和结果相关方面的差异。方法 对 1994 年 3 月至 2007 年 12 月期间在一家医疗机构接受显微椎间盘切除术的患者的病历、手术报告和诊室记录进行回顾,并通过电话问卷对长期随访情况进行评估。结果 40 名患者(男:24,女:16)接受了 L5-S1 (n = 28,70%)、L4-L5 (n = 9,22.5%)、L3-L4 (n = 2,5.0%)和 L1-L2 (n = 1,2.5%)水平的显微椎间盘切除术,手术平均年龄为 39.9 ± 12.5 岁(范围:18-80 岁)。在平均 40.4 ± 40.1 个月(范围:1-128)后,25% 的患者(10/40)需要进一步进行与初次显微椎间盘切除术相关的脊柱手术。在平均 11.1 ± 4.0 年(5-19 年)的术后随访中,除腰腿痛外,接受再次手术的患者更常出现其他症状(P = 0.005)。未接受再次手术的患者满意度明显更高(p = 0.041)。就Oswestry残疾指数而言,再次手术组的疼痛强度(p = 0.036)和与疼痛相关的睡眠障碍(p = 0.006)更为严重。结论 用于治疗 LDH 的显微椎间盘切除术可为大多数病例带来良好的长期疗效。与以往随访时间较短的研究相比,我们的系列研究中的再手术率较高。虽然再次手术和未再次手术的患者在术前/术中没有明显的统计学差异,但我们的研究结果表明,患者自我报告的长期疗效存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes.

Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes.

Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes.

Microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: an evaluation of reoperations and long-term outcomes.

Design Retrospective case series. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the reoperation rate after microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients with ≥ 5-year follow-up and identify demographic, perioperative, and outcome-related differences between patients with and without a reoperation. Methods The medical records, operative reports, and office notes of patients who had undergone microdiscectomy at a single institution between March 1994 and December 2007 were reviewed and long-term follow-up was assessed via a telephone questionnaire. Results Forty patients (M:24, F:16) with an average age at surgery of 39.9 ± 12.5 years (range: 18-80) underwent microdiscectomy at the levels L5-S1 (n = 28, 70%), L4-L5 (n = 9, 22.5%), L3-L4 (n = 2, 5.0%), and L1-L2 (n = 1, 2.5%). After an average of 40.4 ± 40.1 months (range: 1-128), 25% of patients (10/40) required further spine surgery related to the initial microdiscectomy. At an average postoperative follow-up of 11.1 ± 4.0 years (range: 5-19), additional symptoms apart from back and leg pain were reported more frequently by patients who underwent a reoperation (p = 0.005). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in patients who did not undergo a reoperation (p = 0.041). For the Oswestry disability index, pain intensity (p = 0.036), and pain-related sleep disturbances (p = 0.006) were reported to be more severe in the reoperation group. Conclusions Microdiscectomy for the treatment of LDH results in a favorable long-term outcome in the majority of cases. The reoperation rate was higher in our series than reported in previous investigations with shorter follow-up. Although there were no statistically significant pre-/perioperative differences between patients with and without reoperation, our findings suggest a difference in self-reported long-term outcome measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信