单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术在成人和青少年中应用内线吻合器的疗效。

Osaka city medical journal Pub Date : 2014-06-01
Takatsugu Yamamoto, Yukiko Kurashima, Kazunori Ohata, Masato Okawa, Shogo Tanaka, Takahiro Uenishi
{"title":"单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术在成人和青少年中应用内线吻合器的疗效。","authors":"Takatsugu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yukiko Kurashima,&nbsp;Kazunori Ohata,&nbsp;Masato Okawa,&nbsp;Shogo Tanaka,&nbsp;Takahiro Uenishi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some investigators recently introduced transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), however, those SILA require expensive surgical instruments, or difficult technique. We uniquely propose performing SILA using with endolinear stapler, and compare the clinical results of the present SILA with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In brief, the skin of the umbilical hollow is cut, the anterior layer of the rectus sheath and subcutaneous fat is exfoliated widely, and the linea alba is opened. Two low-profile 5-mm-diameter trocars are stabbed through the right rectus sheath, and a 12-mm-diameter trocar is inserted from the opened linea alba. Using a 5-mm laparoscope, and endolinear stapler, the appendix is dissected. Some clinical and operative data of 16 cases treated the present SILA are compared with those of 35 cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed the present SILA for 16 patients consisted of young women mostly, compared with cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (mean, 26-year-old vs 51-year-old, p < 0.0001). The results of the SILA we have proposed in adults and adolescents are good in terms of operation time (mean, 64 minutes vs 89.3 minutes, p = 0.049), duration of hospitalization (mean, 4.2 days vs 8.1 days, p = 0.0038), and low frequency of intra- and postoperative complications (one patient of postoperative umbilical granuloma).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We assume that convenience of surgical procedure of the present SILA would affect the shortness of operation time, and that minimal invasive surgical stress of the present SILA would reduce perioperative stress of appendicitis, and ameliorate adolescents with appendicitis earlier. We believe that the SILA we have proposed offers advantages in diversion of conventional surgical instruments, similarity to conventional manipulation of laparoscopic forceps, usage of an endoscopic stapler able to cut cecum in cases of advanced appendicitis extending to the cecum, and obviation of extra-abdominal appendectomy demanding excessive traction of the appendix.</p>","PeriodicalId":19613,"journal":{"name":"Osaka city medical journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"21-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in adults and adolescents using an endolinear stapler.\",\"authors\":\"Takatsugu Yamamoto,&nbsp;Yukiko Kurashima,&nbsp;Kazunori Ohata,&nbsp;Masato Okawa,&nbsp;Shogo Tanaka,&nbsp;Takahiro Uenishi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Some investigators recently introduced transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), however, those SILA require expensive surgical instruments, or difficult technique. We uniquely propose performing SILA using with endolinear stapler, and compare the clinical results of the present SILA with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In brief, the skin of the umbilical hollow is cut, the anterior layer of the rectus sheath and subcutaneous fat is exfoliated widely, and the linea alba is opened. Two low-profile 5-mm-diameter trocars are stabbed through the right rectus sheath, and a 12-mm-diameter trocar is inserted from the opened linea alba. Using a 5-mm laparoscope, and endolinear stapler, the appendix is dissected. Some clinical and operative data of 16 cases treated the present SILA are compared with those of 35 cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We performed the present SILA for 16 patients consisted of young women mostly, compared with cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (mean, 26-year-old vs 51-year-old, p < 0.0001). The results of the SILA we have proposed in adults and adolescents are good in terms of operation time (mean, 64 minutes vs 89.3 minutes, p = 0.049), duration of hospitalization (mean, 4.2 days vs 8.1 days, p = 0.0038), and low frequency of intra- and postoperative complications (one patient of postoperative umbilical granuloma).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We assume that convenience of surgical procedure of the present SILA would affect the shortness of operation time, and that minimal invasive surgical stress of the present SILA would reduce perioperative stress of appendicitis, and ameliorate adolescents with appendicitis earlier. We believe that the SILA we have proposed offers advantages in diversion of conventional surgical instruments, similarity to conventional manipulation of laparoscopic forceps, usage of an endoscopic stapler able to cut cecum in cases of advanced appendicitis extending to the cecum, and obviation of extra-abdominal appendectomy demanding excessive traction of the appendix.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"21-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka city medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,一些研究者提出了经脐单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA),然而,这种手术需要昂贵的手术器械或困难的技术。我们独特地提出使用内线性吻合器进行SILA,并将本SILA的临床结果与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床结果进行比较。材料与方法:简而言之,切开脐空皮肤,广泛剥去腹直肌鞘前层及皮下脂肪,打开白线。两个直径5毫米的低轮廓套管针穿过右直肌鞘,一个直径12毫米的套管针从打开的白线插入。使用5毫米腹腔镜和内线吻合器,切除阑尾。本文将16例腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床及手术资料与35例传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床及手术资料进行比较。结果:我们对16例患者进行了SILA,其中大多数是年轻女性,与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的病例相比(平均26岁vs 51岁,p < 0.0001)。我们在成人和青少年中提出的SILA的结果在手术时间(平均64分钟对89.3分钟,p = 0.049),住院时间(平均4.2天对8.1天,p = 0.0038)和低发生率的手术内和术后并发症(1例术后脐部肉芽肿)方面都很好。结论:我们认为本术式手术操作的便利性会影响手术时间的缩短,微创手术应激可减轻阑尾炎围手术期应激,早期改善青少年阑尾炎。我们认为,我们提出的SILA在转移传统手术器械方面具有优势,与传统的腹腔镜钳操作相似,在晚期阑尾炎延伸到盲肠的情况下使用内窥镜吻合器能够切割盲肠,并且避免了需要过度牵引阑尾的腹外阑尾切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in adults and adolescents using an endolinear stapler.

Background: Some investigators recently introduced transumbilical single-incisional laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), however, those SILA require expensive surgical instruments, or difficult technique. We uniquely propose performing SILA using with endolinear stapler, and compare the clinical results of the present SILA with those of conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Materials and methods: In brief, the skin of the umbilical hollow is cut, the anterior layer of the rectus sheath and subcutaneous fat is exfoliated widely, and the linea alba is opened. Two low-profile 5-mm-diameter trocars are stabbed through the right rectus sheath, and a 12-mm-diameter trocar is inserted from the opened linea alba. Using a 5-mm laparoscope, and endolinear stapler, the appendix is dissected. Some clinical and operative data of 16 cases treated the present SILA are compared with those of 35 cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Results: We performed the present SILA for 16 patients consisted of young women mostly, compared with cases treated conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (mean, 26-year-old vs 51-year-old, p < 0.0001). The results of the SILA we have proposed in adults and adolescents are good in terms of operation time (mean, 64 minutes vs 89.3 minutes, p = 0.049), duration of hospitalization (mean, 4.2 days vs 8.1 days, p = 0.0038), and low frequency of intra- and postoperative complications (one patient of postoperative umbilical granuloma).

Conclusions: We assume that convenience of surgical procedure of the present SILA would affect the shortness of operation time, and that minimal invasive surgical stress of the present SILA would reduce perioperative stress of appendicitis, and ameliorate adolescents with appendicitis earlier. We believe that the SILA we have proposed offers advantages in diversion of conventional surgical instruments, similarity to conventional manipulation of laparoscopic forceps, usage of an endoscopic stapler able to cut cecum in cases of advanced appendicitis extending to the cecum, and obviation of extra-abdominal appendectomy demanding excessive traction of the appendix.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信