Yingfei Wang, Bo Dong, Lunxiang Zhang, Cong Chen, Weizhong Li, Yongchen Song, Yang Liu
{"title":"晶体和初始水的扩散限制输运对CH4水合物中气态CO2动态置换的影响","authors":"Yingfei Wang, Bo Dong, Lunxiang Zhang, Cong Chen, Weizhong Li, Yongchen Song, Yang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>CO<sub>2</sub>–CH<sub>4</sub> dynamic replacement is a process of the CO<sub>2</sub>–CH<sub>4</sub> replacement method. In this process, CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into CH<sub>4</sub> hydrate-bearing sediment continuously to recover CH<sub>4</sub>. The dynamic replacement process can be divided into the CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> displacement stage and the subsequent dynamic replacement stage and is affected by the existence of initial water and diffusion-limited transport caused by the mixed hydrate layer. Effective fugacity is utilized to combine the thermodynamic model and </span>kinetic model to investigate the effects of the above two factors on the CH</span><sub>4</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub><span> dynamic replacement process. Initial water is assumed to distribute in the pore space. The CH</span><sub>4</sub> hydrate decomposition due to the decrease of CH<sub>4</sub> partial pressure in the gas phase during the CO<sub>2</sub> displacement stage is considered. Our investigation results show that diffusion-limited transport is the main factor that restricts the replacement percent in the displacement stage, the effect of the existence of initial water on the replacement percent is more obvious than that of the diffusion-limited transport. CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency is less than 10% during the entire dynamic replacement and is mainly affected by the existence of initial water rather than the diffusion-limited transport. The temperature increase is mainly due to newly formed hydrate. Finally, more CH<sub>4</sub> hydrate is exploited near the outlet than that near the inlet. Therefore, the CH<sub>4</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub> replacement method needs to be enhanced near the inlet. CO<sub>2</sub> is mainly sequestrated in the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate formed through free water. CO<sub>2</sub> sequestrated in the mixed hydrate is mainly distributed near the inlet, while the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestrated in the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate is mainly distributed near the outlet.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 104741"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influences of diffusion-limited transport in the crystals and initial water on the gaseous CO2 dynamic replacement in CH4 hydrate\",\"authors\":\"Yingfei Wang, Bo Dong, Lunxiang Zhang, Cong Chen, Weizhong Li, Yongchen Song, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>CO<sub>2</sub>–CH<sub>4</sub> dynamic replacement is a process of the CO<sub>2</sub>–CH<sub>4</sub> replacement method. In this process, CO<sub>2</sub> is injected into CH<sub>4</sub> hydrate-bearing sediment continuously to recover CH<sub>4</sub>. The dynamic replacement process can be divided into the CO<sub>2</sub><span><span> displacement stage and the subsequent dynamic replacement stage and is affected by the existence of initial water and diffusion-limited transport caused by the mixed hydrate layer. Effective fugacity is utilized to combine the thermodynamic model and </span>kinetic model to investigate the effects of the above two factors on the CH</span><sub>4</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub><span> dynamic replacement process. Initial water is assumed to distribute in the pore space. The CH</span><sub>4</sub> hydrate decomposition due to the decrease of CH<sub>4</sub> partial pressure in the gas phase during the CO<sub>2</sub> displacement stage is considered. Our investigation results show that diffusion-limited transport is the main factor that restricts the replacement percent in the displacement stage, the effect of the existence of initial water on the replacement percent is more obvious than that of the diffusion-limited transport. CO<sub>2</sub> storage efficiency is less than 10% during the entire dynamic replacement and is mainly affected by the existence of initial water rather than the diffusion-limited transport. The temperature increase is mainly due to newly formed hydrate. Finally, more CH<sub>4</sub> hydrate is exploited near the outlet than that near the inlet. Therefore, the CH<sub>4</sub>–CO<sub>2</sub> replacement method needs to be enhanced near the inlet. CO<sub>2</sub> is mainly sequestrated in the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate formed through free water. CO<sub>2</sub> sequestrated in the mixed hydrate is mainly distributed near the inlet, while the CO<sub>2</sub> sequestrated in the CO<sub>2</sub> hydrate is mainly distributed near the outlet.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104741\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003286\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875510022003286","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influences of diffusion-limited transport in the crystals and initial water on the gaseous CO2 dynamic replacement in CH4 hydrate
CO2–CH4 dynamic replacement is a process of the CO2–CH4 replacement method. In this process, CO2 is injected into CH4 hydrate-bearing sediment continuously to recover CH4. The dynamic replacement process can be divided into the CO2 displacement stage and the subsequent dynamic replacement stage and is affected by the existence of initial water and diffusion-limited transport caused by the mixed hydrate layer. Effective fugacity is utilized to combine the thermodynamic model and kinetic model to investigate the effects of the above two factors on the CH4–CO2 dynamic replacement process. Initial water is assumed to distribute in the pore space. The CH4 hydrate decomposition due to the decrease of CH4 partial pressure in the gas phase during the CO2 displacement stage is considered. Our investigation results show that diffusion-limited transport is the main factor that restricts the replacement percent in the displacement stage, the effect of the existence of initial water on the replacement percent is more obvious than that of the diffusion-limited transport. CO2 storage efficiency is less than 10% during the entire dynamic replacement and is mainly affected by the existence of initial water rather than the diffusion-limited transport. The temperature increase is mainly due to newly formed hydrate. Finally, more CH4 hydrate is exploited near the outlet than that near the inlet. Therefore, the CH4–CO2 replacement method needs to be enhanced near the inlet. CO2 is mainly sequestrated in the CO2 hydrate formed through free water. CO2 sequestrated in the mixed hydrate is mainly distributed near the inlet, while the CO2 sequestrated in the CO2 hydrate is mainly distributed near the outlet.
期刊介绍:
The objective of the Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering is to bridge the gap between the engineering and the science of natural gas by publishing explicitly written articles intelligible to scientists and engineers working in any field of natural gas science and engineering from the reservoir to the market.
An attempt is made in all issues to balance the subject matter and to appeal to a broad readership. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering covers the fields of natural gas exploration, production, processing and transmission in its broadest possible sense. Topics include: origin and accumulation of natural gas; natural gas geochemistry; gas-reservoir engineering; well logging, testing and evaluation; mathematical modelling; enhanced gas recovery; thermodynamics and phase behaviour, gas-reservoir modelling and simulation; natural gas production engineering; primary and enhanced production from unconventional gas resources, subsurface issues related to coalbed methane, tight gas, shale gas, and hydrate production, formation evaluation; exploration methods, multiphase flow and flow assurance issues, novel processing (e.g., subsea) techniques, raw gas transmission methods, gas processing/LNG technologies, sales gas transmission and storage. The Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering will also focus on economical, environmental, management and safety issues related to natural gas production, processing and transportation.