{"title":"OCTET试验，社区治疗订单和循证实践。","authors":"Feras A Mustafa","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.4.197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the findings of the OCTET study,[1][1] Burns & Molodynski reject observations of consultants who reported directly observable benefits from community treatment orders (CTOs). They argue that it is not possible to ‘see with one’s own eyes’ a probabilistic outcome that takes months to","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 4","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.4.197","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The OCTET trial, community treatment orders and evidence-based practice.\",\"authors\":\"Feras A Mustafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/pb.38.4.197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the findings of the OCTET study,[1][1] Burns & Molodynski reject observations of consultants who reported directly observable benefits from community treatment orders (CTOs). They argue that it is not possible to ‘see with one’s own eyes’ a probabilistic outcome that takes months to\",\"PeriodicalId\":90710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"197\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.4.197\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.4.197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.4.197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The OCTET trial, community treatment orders and evidence-based practice.
Based on the findings of the OCTET study,[1][1] Burns & Molodynski reject observations of consultants who reported directly observable benefits from community treatment orders (CTOs). They argue that it is not possible to ‘see with one’s own eyes’ a probabilistic outcome that takes months to
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
