直升机水下逃生训练(HUET) 2005-2012年受伤率。

Christopher J Brooks, Conor V MacDonald, Peter N A Gibbs
{"title":"直升机水下逃生训练(HUET) 2005-2012年受伤率。","authors":"Christopher J Brooks,&nbsp;Conor V MacDonald,&nbsp;Peter N A Gibbs","doi":"10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicopter underwater escape training (HUET) carries a potential for injury and this paper identifies the injury rate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A marine survival training school registry of all students trained between 2005-2012 in HUET and the coinciding accident records were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8902 students trained in a helicopter underwater escape simulator for a total of 59,245 underwater escapes. There were 40 cases where only first-aid was required and 3 serious injuries (a laceration requiring 5 sutures, 1 dislocated shoulder, and 1 water aspiration requiring hospitalization). There were no deaths and no problems reported with using the Emergency Breathing System (EBS) or Air Pocket. Of the injuries, 11 were due to the student using a poor escape technique. The overall probability of injury was 0.74 per 1000 ascents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HUET training, there is a very low injury rate with almost no significant severity. Although not scientifically proven, this would suggest that the low incident rate is due to good medical screening and the attention given by instructors to anxious students. Compared to other training such as diving, parachute jumping, and submarine escape training, the rate of injury was considerably lower.</p>","PeriodicalId":8676,"journal":{"name":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","volume":"85 8","pages":"857-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Injury rate in a helicopter underwater escape trainer (HUET) from 2005-2012.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher J Brooks,&nbsp;Conor V MacDonald,&nbsp;Peter N A Gibbs\",\"doi\":\"10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicopter underwater escape training (HUET) carries a potential for injury and this paper identifies the injury rate.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A marine survival training school registry of all students trained between 2005-2012 in HUET and the coinciding accident records were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8902 students trained in a helicopter underwater escape simulator for a total of 59,245 underwater escapes. There were 40 cases where only first-aid was required and 3 serious injuries (a laceration requiring 5 sutures, 1 dislocated shoulder, and 1 water aspiration requiring hospitalization). There were no deaths and no problems reported with using the Emergency Breathing System (EBS) or Air Pocket. Of the injuries, 11 were due to the student using a poor escape technique. The overall probability of injury was 0.74 per 1000 ascents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In HUET training, there is a very low injury rate with almost no significant severity. Although not scientifically proven, this would suggest that the low incident rate is due to good medical screening and the attention given by instructors to anxious students. Compared to other training such as diving, parachute jumping, and submarine escape training, the rate of injury was considerably lower.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine\",\"volume\":\"85 8\",\"pages\":\"857-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation, space, and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.3624.2014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直升机水下逃生训练(HUET)具有潜在的伤害,本文确定了受伤率。方法:对2005-2012年我校所有受训学员的海上生存培训学校注册表和相关事故记录进行分析。结果:直升机水下逃生模拟器共训练学员8902人,水下逃生59,245次。有40例只需要急救,3例严重受伤(1例撕裂伤需要5次缝合,1例肩部脱臼,1例误吸水需要住院)。使用紧急呼吸系统(EBS)或空气袋没有死亡和问题报告。其中11人受伤是由于该学生使用了糟糕的逃生技术。受伤的总体概率为0.74 / 1000。结论:在HUET训练中,损伤率非常低,几乎没有明显的严重程度。虽然没有科学证明,但这表明低发生率是由于良好的医疗筛查和教师对焦虑学生的关注。与其他训练如潜水、跳伞和潜艇逃生训练相比,受伤率要低得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Injury rate in a helicopter underwater escape trainer (HUET) from 2005-2012.

Background: Helicopter underwater escape training (HUET) carries a potential for injury and this paper identifies the injury rate.

Method: A marine survival training school registry of all students trained between 2005-2012 in HUET and the coinciding accident records were examined.

Results: There were 8902 students trained in a helicopter underwater escape simulator for a total of 59,245 underwater escapes. There were 40 cases where only first-aid was required and 3 serious injuries (a laceration requiring 5 sutures, 1 dislocated shoulder, and 1 water aspiration requiring hospitalization). There were no deaths and no problems reported with using the Emergency Breathing System (EBS) or Air Pocket. Of the injuries, 11 were due to the student using a poor escape technique. The overall probability of injury was 0.74 per 1000 ascents.

Conclusions: In HUET training, there is a very low injury rate with almost no significant severity. Although not scientifically proven, this would suggest that the low incident rate is due to good medical screening and the attention given by instructors to anxious students. Compared to other training such as diving, parachute jumping, and submarine escape training, the rate of injury was considerably lower.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine
Aviation, space, and environmental medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信