比较卡维地洛与美托洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤的双盲研究。

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rozita Jalalian, Rahman Ghafari, Peyman Ghazanfari
{"title":"比较卡维地洛与美托洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤的双盲研究。","authors":"Rozita Jalalian,&nbsp;Rahman Ghafari,&nbsp;Peyman Ghazanfari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after open heart surgery and is frequently associated with increased hospital stay, complications, and mortality rates. The effect of β-blockers on prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias has been confirmed in several prospective randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This clinical trial aimed to compare the preventive effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on occurrence of AF after CABG surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 patients (55 females, 95 males; mean age: 59 ± 10 years) who underwent CABG surgery. The patients with no contraindication for β-blocker use were randomly divided into two groups of carvedilol and metoprolol Tartarate (n = 75). Treatment with β-blocker was started on the first postoperative day (metoprolol, 25 mg BD; carvedilol, 6.25 mg, BD) and the dosage was regulated according to the patients' hemodynamic response. All the patients were monitored 5 days after the surgery and incidence of AF and other complications was recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AF was detected in 18 patients in the carvedilol group and 21 patients in the metoprolol group (P = 0.577). The results of Fisher Exact test showed no significant relationship between the type of the drug and the occurrence of AF (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the prevalence of AF was higher in the renal failure group. AF was mostly recorded on the second and third days after the surgery. The results showed an association between old age and higher occurrence of AF. AF was recorded in 11 patients (14%) in the metoprolol group and 9 ones (12%) in the carvedilol group, with Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) being between 35% and 45% (P = 0.587). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in this regard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the patients with sufficient ejection fraction, no difference was observed in using carvedilol or metoprolol in prevention of post-CABG AF. Yet, given the anti-oxidant and anti- inflammatory effects of carvedilol, it might be more beneficial in comparison to metoprolol, particularly in the patients with lower ejection fractions or heart failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":43653,"journal":{"name":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","volume":"8 3","pages":"111-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the therapeutic effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery, a double-blind study.\",\"authors\":\"Rozita Jalalian,&nbsp;Rahman Ghafari,&nbsp;Peyman Ghazanfari\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after open heart surgery and is frequently associated with increased hospital stay, complications, and mortality rates. The effect of β-blockers on prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias has been confirmed in several prospective randomized studies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This clinical trial aimed to compare the preventive effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on occurrence of AF after CABG surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 patients (55 females, 95 males; mean age: 59 ± 10 years) who underwent CABG surgery. The patients with no contraindication for β-blocker use were randomly divided into two groups of carvedilol and metoprolol Tartarate (n = 75). Treatment with β-blocker was started on the first postoperative day (metoprolol, 25 mg BD; carvedilol, 6.25 mg, BD) and the dosage was regulated according to the patients' hemodynamic response. All the patients were monitored 5 days after the surgery and incidence of AF and other complications was recorded in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AF was detected in 18 patients in the carvedilol group and 21 patients in the metoprolol group (P = 0.577). The results of Fisher Exact test showed no significant relationship between the type of the drug and the occurrence of AF (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the prevalence of AF was higher in the renal failure group. AF was mostly recorded on the second and third days after the surgery. The results showed an association between old age and higher occurrence of AF. AF was recorded in 11 patients (14%) in the metoprolol group and 9 ones (12%) in the carvedilol group, with Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) being between 35% and 45% (P = 0.587). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in this regard.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the patients with sufficient ejection fraction, no difference was observed in using carvedilol or metoprolol in prevention of post-CABG AF. Yet, given the anti-oxidant and anti- inflammatory effects of carvedilol, it might be more beneficial in comparison to metoprolol, particularly in the patients with lower ejection fractions or heart failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"111-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4109035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心房颤动(AF)是心脏直视手术后常见的并发症,通常与住院时间、并发症和死亡率增加有关。β受体阻滞剂对预防室上性心律失常的作用已在几项前瞻性随机研究中得到证实。目的:本临床试验旨在比较卡维地洛和美托洛尔对冠脉搭桥术后房颤发生的预防作用。患者和方法:本前瞻性、双盲、随机临床试验纳入150例患者(女性55例,男性95例;平均年龄:59±10岁)。无β受体阻滞剂禁忌症的患者随机分为卡维地洛和酒石酸美托洛尔两组(n = 75)。术后第一天开始用β受体阻滞剂治疗(美托洛尔,25 mg BD;卡维地洛,6.25 mg, BD),根据患者血流动力学反应调节剂量。术后5 d监测两组患者房颤及其他并发症的发生情况。结果:卡维地洛组18例检测到房颤,美托洛尔组21例检测到房颤(P = 0.577)。Fisher Exact检验结果显示,药物种类与房颤发生无显著相关性(P < 0.05)。然而,房颤的患病率在肾功能衰竭组较高。AF多发生在术后第2、3天。结果显示,老年与房颤的高发相关。美托洛尔组房颤11例(14%),卡维地洛组房颤9例(12%),左心室射血分数(LVEF)在35% ~ 45%之间(P = 0.587)。然而,两组在这方面没有明显差异。结论:在射血分数足够的患者中,卡维地洛和美托洛尔在预防cabg后房颤方面没有差异。然而,考虑到卡维地洛的抗氧化和抗炎作用,它可能比美托洛尔更有益,特别是在射血分数较低或心力衰竭的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing the therapeutic effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery, a double-blind study.

Comparing the therapeutic effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery, a double-blind study.

Background: Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after open heart surgery and is frequently associated with increased hospital stay, complications, and mortality rates. The effect of β-blockers on prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias has been confirmed in several prospective randomized studies.

Objectives: This clinical trial aimed to compare the preventive effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on occurrence of AF after CABG surgery.

Patients and methods: This prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 150 patients (55 females, 95 males; mean age: 59 ± 10 years) who underwent CABG surgery. The patients with no contraindication for β-blocker use were randomly divided into two groups of carvedilol and metoprolol Tartarate (n = 75). Treatment with β-blocker was started on the first postoperative day (metoprolol, 25 mg BD; carvedilol, 6.25 mg, BD) and the dosage was regulated according to the patients' hemodynamic response. All the patients were monitored 5 days after the surgery and incidence of AF and other complications was recorded in both groups.

Results: AF was detected in 18 patients in the carvedilol group and 21 patients in the metoprolol group (P = 0.577). The results of Fisher Exact test showed no significant relationship between the type of the drug and the occurrence of AF (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the prevalence of AF was higher in the renal failure group. AF was mostly recorded on the second and third days after the surgery. The results showed an association between old age and higher occurrence of AF. AF was recorded in 11 patients (14%) in the metoprolol group and 9 ones (12%) in the carvedilol group, with Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) being between 35% and 45% (P = 0.587). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in this regard.

Conclusions: In the patients with sufficient ejection fraction, no difference was observed in using carvedilol or metoprolol in prevention of post-CABG AF. Yet, given the anti-oxidant and anti- inflammatory effects of carvedilol, it might be more beneficial in comparison to metoprolol, particularly in the patients with lower ejection fractions or heart failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Cardiovascular Research Journal
International Cardiovascular Research Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信