FOBT预筛提高了老年结直肠癌筛查的成功率,具有成本效益。

ISRN gastroenterology Pub Date : 2014-04-06 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/179291
Shashideep Singhal, Kinesh Changela, Puneet Basi, Siddharth Mathur, Sridhar Reddy, Mojdeh Momeni, Mahesh Krishnaiah, Sury Anand
{"title":"FOBT预筛提高了老年结直肠癌筛查的成功率,具有成本效益。","authors":"Shashideep Singhal,&nbsp;Kinesh Changela,&nbsp;Puneet Basi,&nbsp;Siddharth Mathur,&nbsp;Sridhar Reddy,&nbsp;Mojdeh Momeni,&nbsp;Mahesh Krishnaiah,&nbsp;Sury Anand","doi":"10.1155/2014/179291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US $ and 10 US $, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US $ in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US $ (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool. </p>","PeriodicalId":89397,"journal":{"name":"ISRN gastroenterology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"179291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/179291","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly.\",\"authors\":\"Shashideep Singhal,&nbsp;Kinesh Changela,&nbsp;Puneet Basi,&nbsp;Siddharth Mathur,&nbsp;Sridhar Reddy,&nbsp;Mojdeh Momeni,&nbsp;Mahesh Krishnaiah,&nbsp;Sury Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/179291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US $ and 10 US $, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US $ in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US $ (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"179291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/179291\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/179291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

背景。结肠镜检查在老年人(75岁以上)常规结直肠癌(CRC)筛查中的应用是有争议的。本研究旨在评估使用粪便隐血试验(FOBT)选择结肠镜检查的患者是否可以提高产出率,并对老年人来说是一种经济有效的方法。方法。回顾了10,908名在研究期间进行结肠镜检查的受试者的记录。≥75岁的1496例(13.7%)。其中118名受试者进行结肠镜检查以评估FOBT阳性。比较+FOBT组(f组)和无症状筛查组(as组)的结果。成本效益也通过标准化的全球结肠镜检查和FOBT费用(四舍五入到最接近的整数)的中位数估计分别为1000美元和10美元来计算。结果:118/1496(7.9%)进行结肠镜检查评估+FOBT。as组464/1496例(31%)行结肠镜检查。f组高危腺瘤检出率(HR-ADR)为15.2%,其中11.9%为1-2管状腺瘤。对照组的HR-ADR为19.2%,1-2管状腺瘤为17.7%。FOBT+组CRC检出率为5.1%,显著高于as组的1.7% (P = 0.03)。在成本-效果分析中,f组每例CRC检测成本明显较低,为19666美元,而as组为58,000美元(P < 0.05)。各组间其他参数差异无统计学意义。结论。用FOBT进行预筛查以选择老年人进行结肠镜检查似乎可以提高筛查率,并且在该亚群中是一种具有成本效益的结直肠癌筛查方法。在风险效益分析中,对老年人进行筛查的好处似乎通过一种廉价的工具得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly.

Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly.

Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly.

Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US $ and 10 US $, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US $ in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US $ (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信