皮质类固醇在COPD治疗中的应用。

Current respiratory care reports Pub Date : 2014-07-06 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2
Daan A De Coster, Melvyn Jones
{"title":"皮质类固醇在COPD治疗中的应用。","authors":"Daan A De Coster,&nbsp;Melvyn Jones","doi":"10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This literature review updates the reader on the new studies regarding steroid therapy over the last year in stable COPD and in exacerbations. In stable COPD, we critique the 2011 update and 2013 revision of the GOLD guidelines, discuss why combining inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) (ICS/LABA) is preferable over LABA alone and review the literature for intraclass differences, finding that the evidence does not clearly support superiority of any particular ICS/LABA. We also address other comparisons against ICS/LABA, including triple therapy. We briefly review which type of inhaler should be chosen. For exacerbations, we report the REDUCE trial findings favouring a 5-day course of systemic steroids, and other trials addressing which steroid and route to use, including in an intensive care setting. Lastly, the future lies in new anti-inflammatories and re-phenotyping the heterogeneous amalgamation of COPD. A Spanish guideline recommends distinguishing steroid-responsive eosinophilic exacerbators from other phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":89672,"journal":{"name":"Current respiratory care reports","volume":"3 ","pages":"121-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailoring of corticosteroids in COPD management.\",\"authors\":\"Daan A De Coster,&nbsp;Melvyn Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This literature review updates the reader on the new studies regarding steroid therapy over the last year in stable COPD and in exacerbations. In stable COPD, we critique the 2011 update and 2013 revision of the GOLD guidelines, discuss why combining inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) (ICS/LABA) is preferable over LABA alone and review the literature for intraclass differences, finding that the evidence does not clearly support superiority of any particular ICS/LABA. We also address other comparisons against ICS/LABA, including triple therapy. We briefly review which type of inhaler should be chosen. For exacerbations, we report the REDUCE trial findings favouring a 5-day course of systemic steroids, and other trials addressing which steroid and route to use, including in an intensive care setting. Lastly, the future lies in new anti-inflammatories and re-phenotyping the heterogeneous amalgamation of COPD. A Spanish guideline recommends distinguishing steroid-responsive eosinophilic exacerbators from other phenotypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current respiratory care reports\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"121-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current respiratory care reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current respiratory care reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13665-014-0084-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

本文献综述向读者介绍了过去一年中关于类固醇治疗稳定期COPD和急性加重期COPD的最新研究。在稳定期COPD中,我们对2011年更新和2013年修订的GOLD指南进行了批评,讨论了为什么吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)与长效β激动剂(LABA) (ICS/LABA)联合使用比单独使用LABA更优选,并回顾了类内差异的文献,发现证据并没有明确支持任何特定ICS/LABA的优势。我们还讨论了与ICS/LABA的其他比较,包括三联疗法。我们简要回顾一下应该选择哪种吸入器。对于病情恶化,我们报告了REDUCE试验结果,支持5天的全身性类固醇疗程,以及其他试验,包括在重症监护环境中使用哪种类固醇和途径。最后,未来在于新的抗炎药和对COPD异质性合并的重新表型分析。西班牙指南建议将类固醇反应性嗜酸性加重症与其他表型区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tailoring of corticosteroids in COPD management.

This literature review updates the reader on the new studies regarding steroid therapy over the last year in stable COPD and in exacerbations. In stable COPD, we critique the 2011 update and 2013 revision of the GOLD guidelines, discuss why combining inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) with long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) (ICS/LABA) is preferable over LABA alone and review the literature for intraclass differences, finding that the evidence does not clearly support superiority of any particular ICS/LABA. We also address other comparisons against ICS/LABA, including triple therapy. We briefly review which type of inhaler should be chosen. For exacerbations, we report the REDUCE trial findings favouring a 5-day course of systemic steroids, and other trials addressing which steroid and route to use, including in an intensive care setting. Lastly, the future lies in new anti-inflammatories and re-phenotyping the heterogeneous amalgamation of COPD. A Spanish guideline recommends distinguishing steroid-responsive eosinophilic exacerbators from other phenotypes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信