医生使用专业互联网的动机和对互联网知情患者、医患沟通和处方行为的态度差异。

Medicine 2.0 Pub Date : 2012-07-06 eCollection Date: 2012-07-01 DOI:10.2196/med20.1996
Martina Moick, Ralf Terlutter
{"title":"医生使用专业互联网的动机和对互联网知情患者、医患沟通和处方行为的态度差异。","authors":"Martina Moick,&nbsp;Ralf Terlutter","doi":"10.2196/med20.1996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians have differing motives for using the Internet and Internet-related services in their professional work. These motives may affect their evaluation of patients who bring with them health-related information from the Internet. Differing motives may also affect physician-patient communication and subsequent prescribing behavior.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to segment physicians into types based on their motives for using the internet in connection with professional activities and to analyze how those segments differ in their attitudes in three areas: toward patients who bring along Internet-sourced information; in their own subsequent prescribing behavior; and in their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 287 German physicians online from three medical fields. To assess physicians' motives for using the Internet for their professional activities, we asked them to rate their level of agreement with statements on a 7-point scale. Motive statements were reduced to motive dimensions using principal component analysis, and 2-step cluster analysis based on motive dimensions identified different segments of physicians. Several statements assessed agreement or disagreement on a 7-point scale physicians' attitudes toward patients' bringing Internet information to the consultation and their own subsequent prescribing behavior. Further, we asked physicians to indicate on a 7-point scale their valuation of the Internet for physician-patient communication in the future. Data were then subjected to variance and contingency analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we identified three motive dimensions for internet use: (1) being on the cutting edge and for self-expression (Cronbach alpha = .88), (2) efficiency and effectiveness (alpha = .79), and (3) diversity and convenience (alpha = .71). These three factors accounted for 71.4% of the variance. Based on physicians' motives for using the Internet, four types of physician Internet user were identified: (1) the Internet Advocate (2), Efficiency-Oriented, (3) Internet Critic, and (4) Driven Self-expressionist. Groups differed significantly concerning (1) their attitude toward informed patients in general (F 1234 = 9.215, P < .001), (2) perceived improvement in the physician-patient relationship Internet information brings (F 1234 = 5.386, P < .001), (3) perceived accuracy of information the patient brings (F 1234 = 3.658, P = .01), and (4) perceived amount of time needed to devote to an Internet-informed patient (F 1234 = 3.356, P = .02). Physician segments did not differ significantly in reported prescribing behavior (F 1234 = 1.910, P = .13). However, attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future differed significantly (F 1234 = 23.242, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on self-reporting by German physicians of their motives for professional Internet use, we identified four types of Internet users who differ significantly in their attitude toward patients who bring along Internet information and their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":90648,"journal":{"name":"Medicine 2.0","volume":"1 2","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4084769/pdf/","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physicians' motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Moick,&nbsp;Ralf Terlutter\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/med20.1996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians have differing motives for using the Internet and Internet-related services in their professional work. These motives may affect their evaluation of patients who bring with them health-related information from the Internet. Differing motives may also affect physician-patient communication and subsequent prescribing behavior.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to segment physicians into types based on their motives for using the internet in connection with professional activities and to analyze how those segments differ in their attitudes in three areas: toward patients who bring along Internet-sourced information; in their own subsequent prescribing behavior; and in their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 287 German physicians online from three medical fields. To assess physicians' motives for using the Internet for their professional activities, we asked them to rate their level of agreement with statements on a 7-point scale. Motive statements were reduced to motive dimensions using principal component analysis, and 2-step cluster analysis based on motive dimensions identified different segments of physicians. Several statements assessed agreement or disagreement on a 7-point scale physicians' attitudes toward patients' bringing Internet information to the consultation and their own subsequent prescribing behavior. Further, we asked physicians to indicate on a 7-point scale their valuation of the Internet for physician-patient communication in the future. Data were then subjected to variance and contingency analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we identified three motive dimensions for internet use: (1) being on the cutting edge and for self-expression (Cronbach alpha = .88), (2) efficiency and effectiveness (alpha = .79), and (3) diversity and convenience (alpha = .71). These three factors accounted for 71.4% of the variance. Based on physicians' motives for using the Internet, four types of physician Internet user were identified: (1) the Internet Advocate (2), Efficiency-Oriented, (3) Internet Critic, and (4) Driven Self-expressionist. Groups differed significantly concerning (1) their attitude toward informed patients in general (F 1234 = 9.215, P < .001), (2) perceived improvement in the physician-patient relationship Internet information brings (F 1234 = 5.386, P < .001), (3) perceived accuracy of information the patient brings (F 1234 = 3.658, P = .01), and (4) perceived amount of time needed to devote to an Internet-informed patient (F 1234 = 3.356, P = .02). Physician segments did not differ significantly in reported prescribing behavior (F 1234 = 1.910, P = .13). However, attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future differed significantly (F 1234 = 23.242, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on self-reporting by German physicians of their motives for professional Internet use, we identified four types of Internet users who differ significantly in their attitude toward patients who bring along Internet information and their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine 2.0\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4084769/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine 2.0\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/med20.1996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine 2.0","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/med20.1996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

背景:医生在其专业工作中使用互联网和互联网相关服务的动机不同。这些动机可能会影响他们对从互联网上获取健康相关信息的患者的评价。不同的动机也可能影响医患沟通和随后的处方行为。目标:根据医生在专业活动中使用互联网的动机,将他们划分为不同的类型,并分析这些部分在三个方面的态度差异:对携带互联网来源信息的患者;在他们自己随后的处方行为中;以及他们对未来使用互联网与患者沟通的态度。方法:我们在线调查了来自三个医学领域的287名德国医生。为了评估医生在专业活动中使用互联网的动机,我们要求他们以7分制对他们对陈述的同意程度进行评分。使用主成分分析将动机陈述简化为动机维度,基于动机维度的两步聚类分析确定了不同的医生群体。一些陈述以7分制评估了医生对患者将互联网信息带到会诊的态度和他们自己随后的处方行为的同意或不同意。此外,我们要求医生以7分制表示他们对未来医患沟通的互联网的评价。然后对数据进行方差和偶然性分析。结果:我们确定了互联网使用的三个动机维度:(1)处于前沿和自我表达(Cronbach α = 0.88),(2)效率和有效性(α = 0.79),(3)多样性和便利性(α = 0.71)。这三个因素占方差的71.4%。基于医生使用互联网的动机,可以将医生互联网用户划分为四种类型:(1)互联网倡导者(2)、效率导向型(Efficiency-Oriented)、网络批评者(3)和驱动型自我表现主义者(4)。各组在以下方面存在显著差异:(1)对知情患者的总体态度(F 1234 = 9.215, P < .001);(2)感知到互联网信息带来的医患关系改善(F 1234 = 5.386, P < .001);(3)感知到患者带来的信息的准确性(F 1234 = 3.658, P = .01);(4)感知到为知情患者投入的时间(F 1234 = 3.356, P = .02)。各医生组别在报告的处方行为上无显著差异(f1234 = 1.910, P = 0.13)。但对未来使用互联网与患者沟通的态度差异有统计学意义(F 1234 = 23.242, P < 0.001)。结论:基于德国医生对其专业互联网使用动机的自我报告,我们确定了四种类型的互联网用户,他们对携带互联网信息的患者的态度以及他们对未来使用互联网与患者交流的态度存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physicians' motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior.

Background: Physicians have differing motives for using the Internet and Internet-related services in their professional work. These motives may affect their evaluation of patients who bring with them health-related information from the Internet. Differing motives may also affect physician-patient communication and subsequent prescribing behavior.

Objectives: to segment physicians into types based on their motives for using the internet in connection with professional activities and to analyze how those segments differ in their attitudes in three areas: toward patients who bring along Internet-sourced information; in their own subsequent prescribing behavior; and in their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.

Methods: We surveyed 287 German physicians online from three medical fields. To assess physicians' motives for using the Internet for their professional activities, we asked them to rate their level of agreement with statements on a 7-point scale. Motive statements were reduced to motive dimensions using principal component analysis, and 2-step cluster analysis based on motive dimensions identified different segments of physicians. Several statements assessed agreement or disagreement on a 7-point scale physicians' attitudes toward patients' bringing Internet information to the consultation and their own subsequent prescribing behavior. Further, we asked physicians to indicate on a 7-point scale their valuation of the Internet for physician-patient communication in the future. Data were then subjected to variance and contingency analyses.

Results: we identified three motive dimensions for internet use: (1) being on the cutting edge and for self-expression (Cronbach alpha = .88), (2) efficiency and effectiveness (alpha = .79), and (3) diversity and convenience (alpha = .71). These three factors accounted for 71.4% of the variance. Based on physicians' motives for using the Internet, four types of physician Internet user were identified: (1) the Internet Advocate (2), Efficiency-Oriented, (3) Internet Critic, and (4) Driven Self-expressionist. Groups differed significantly concerning (1) their attitude toward informed patients in general (F 1234 = 9.215, P < .001), (2) perceived improvement in the physician-patient relationship Internet information brings (F 1234 = 5.386, P < .001), (3) perceived accuracy of information the patient brings (F 1234 = 3.658, P = .01), and (4) perceived amount of time needed to devote to an Internet-informed patient (F 1234 = 3.356, P = .02). Physician segments did not differ significantly in reported prescribing behavior (F 1234 = 1.910, P = .13). However, attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future differed significantly (F 1234 = 23.242, P < .001).

Conclusions: Based on self-reporting by German physicians of their motives for professional Internet use, we identified four types of Internet users who differ significantly in their attitude toward patients who bring along Internet information and their attitudes toward using the Internet to communicate with patients in future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信