除了脊椎治疗:医疗保险是否应该扩大脊椎治疗服务的覆盖范围?对政策制定者面临的挑战的回顾和评论

Q3 Health Professions
James M. Whedon DC, MS , Christine M. Goertz DC, PhD , Jon D. Lurie MD, MS , William B. Stason MD, MSci
{"title":"除了脊椎治疗:医疗保险是否应该扩大脊椎治疗服务的覆盖范围?对政策制定者面临的挑战的回顾和评论","authors":"James M. Whedon DC, MS ,&nbsp;Christine M. Goertz DC, PhD ,&nbsp;Jon D. Lurie MD, MS ,&nbsp;William B. Stason MD, MSci","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2013.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span><span>Private insurance plans typically reimburse doctors of chiropractic for a range of clinical services, but Medicare </span>reimbursements are restricted to </span>spinal manipulation procedures<span>. Medicare pays for evaluations performed by medical and osteopathic physicians<span><span>, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, </span>podiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists; however, it does not reimburse the same services provided by chiropractic physicians. Advocates for expanded coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare cite clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction, whereas critics point to unnecessary services, inadequate clinical documentation, and projected cost increases. To further inform this debate, the purpose of this commentary is to address the following questions: (1) What are the barriers to expand coverage for chiropractic services? (2) What could potentially be done to address these issues? (3) Is there a rationale for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to expand coverage for chiropractic services?</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted of Google and PubMed for peer-reviewed articles and US government reports relevant to the provision of chiropractic care under Medicare. We reviewed relevant articles and reports to identify key issues concerning the expansion of coverage for chiropractic under Medicare, including identification of barriers and rationale for expanded coverage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature search yielded 29 peer-reviewed articles and 7 federal government reports. Our review of these documents revealed 3 key barriers to full coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare: inadequate documentation of chiropractic claims, possible provision of unnecessary preventive care services, and the uncertain costs of expanded coverage. Our recommendations to address these barriers include the following: individual chiropractic physicians, as well as state and national chiropractic organizations, should continue to strengthen efforts to improve claims and documentation practices; and additional rigorous efficacy/effectiveness research and clinical studies for chiropractic services need to be performed. Research of chiropractic services should target the triple aim of high-quality care, affordability, and improved health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The barriers that were identified in this study can be addressed. To overcome these barriers, the chiropractic profession and individual physicians must assume responsibility for correcting deficiencies in compliance and documentation; further research needs to be done to evaluate chiropractic services; and effectiveness of extended episodes of preventive chiropractic care should be rigorously evaluated. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policies related to chiropractic reimbursement should be reexamined using the same standards applicable to other health care providers. The integration of chiropractic physicians as fully engaged Medicare providers has the potential to enhance the capacity of the Medicare workforce to care for the growing population. We recommend that Medicare policy makers consider limited expansion of Medicare coverage to include, at a minimum, reimbursement for evaluation and management services by chiropractic physicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"20 1","pages":"Pages 9-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2013.07.001","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond spinal manipulation: should Medicare expand coverage for chiropractic services? A review and commentary on the challenges for policy makers\",\"authors\":\"James M. Whedon DC, MS ,&nbsp;Christine M. Goertz DC, PhD ,&nbsp;Jon D. Lurie MD, MS ,&nbsp;William B. Stason MD, MSci\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.echu.2013.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span><span>Private insurance plans typically reimburse doctors of chiropractic for a range of clinical services, but Medicare </span>reimbursements are restricted to </span>spinal manipulation procedures<span>. Medicare pays for evaluations performed by medical and osteopathic physicians<span><span>, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, </span>podiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists; however, it does not reimburse the same services provided by chiropractic physicians. Advocates for expanded coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare cite clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction, whereas critics point to unnecessary services, inadequate clinical documentation, and projected cost increases. To further inform this debate, the purpose of this commentary is to address the following questions: (1) What are the barriers to expand coverage for chiropractic services? (2) What could potentially be done to address these issues? (3) Is there a rationale for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to expand coverage for chiropractic services?</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A literature search was conducted of Google and PubMed for peer-reviewed articles and US government reports relevant to the provision of chiropractic care under Medicare. We reviewed relevant articles and reports to identify key issues concerning the expansion of coverage for chiropractic under Medicare, including identification of barriers and rationale for expanded coverage.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The literature search yielded 29 peer-reviewed articles and 7 federal government reports. Our review of these documents revealed 3 key barriers to full coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare: inadequate documentation of chiropractic claims, possible provision of unnecessary preventive care services, and the uncertain costs of expanded coverage. Our recommendations to address these barriers include the following: individual chiropractic physicians, as well as state and national chiropractic organizations, should continue to strengthen efforts to improve claims and documentation practices; and additional rigorous efficacy/effectiveness research and clinical studies for chiropractic services need to be performed. Research of chiropractic services should target the triple aim of high-quality care, affordability, and improved health.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The barriers that were identified in this study can be addressed. To overcome these barriers, the chiropractic profession and individual physicians must assume responsibility for correcting deficiencies in compliance and documentation; further research needs to be done to evaluate chiropractic services; and effectiveness of extended episodes of preventive chiropractic care should be rigorously evaluated. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policies related to chiropractic reimbursement should be reexamined using the same standards applicable to other health care providers. The integration of chiropractic physicians as fully engaged Medicare providers has the potential to enhance the capacity of the Medicare workforce to care for the growing population. We recommend that Medicare policy makers consider limited expansion of Medicare coverage to include, at a minimum, reimbursement for evaluation and management services by chiropractic physicians.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 9-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2013.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349913000028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556349913000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:私人保险计划通常会报销脊椎按摩医生的一系列临床服务,但医疗保险报销仅限于脊柱推拿手术。医疗保险支付由医疗和骨科医生、执业护士、医师助理、足病医生、物理治疗师和职业治疗师进行的评估;然而,它不报销脊骨按摩医生提供的相同服务。提倡扩大医疗保险覆盖范围的人引用了临床效果和患者满意度,而批评者则指出了不必要的服务、不充分的临床文件和预计的成本增加。为了进一步为这场辩论提供信息,本评论的目的是解决以下问题:(1)扩大脊椎指压治疗服务覆盖面的障碍是什么?(2)如何解决这些问题?(3)医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心是否有理由扩大脊椎按摩服务的覆盖范围?方法对b谷歌和PubMed进行文献检索,检索同行评议的文章和美国政府报告,这些报告与医疗保险下提供脊椎指压治疗有关。我们回顾了相关的文章和报告,以确定在医疗保险下扩大脊骨疗法覆盖面的关键问题,包括确定扩大覆盖面的障碍和理由。结果文献检索得到29篇同行评议文章和7份联邦政府报告。我们对这些文件的回顾揭示了医疗保险全面覆盖脊医服务的3个主要障碍:脊医索赔文件不充分,可能提供不必要的预防保健服务,以及扩大覆盖范围的不确定成本。我们对解决这些障碍的建议包括:个体脊医,以及州和国家脊医组织,应该继续加强努力,改善索赔和文件的做法;此外,还需要对脊椎指压治疗服务进行严格的疗效/有效性研究和临床研究。脊骨按摩服务的研究应该以高质量的护理、可负担性和改善健康为目标。结论本研究中发现的障碍是可以解决的。为了克服这些障碍,脊医专业和个体医生必须承担起纠正依从性和文件缺陷的责任;需要进一步的研究来评估脊医服务;延长预防性捏脊护理的有效性应严格评估。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心与脊椎按摩疗法报销相关的政策应该使用适用于其他医疗保健提供者的相同标准进行重新审查。整合脊医作为充分参与医疗保险提供者有潜力提高医疗保险劳动力的能力,以照顾不断增长的人口。我们建议医疗保险政策制定者考虑有限地扩大医疗保险覆盖范围,至少包括脊医的评估和管理服务的报销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond spinal manipulation: should Medicare expand coverage for chiropractic services? A review and commentary on the challenges for policy makers

Objectives

Private insurance plans typically reimburse doctors of chiropractic for a range of clinical services, but Medicare reimbursements are restricted to spinal manipulation procedures. Medicare pays for evaluations performed by medical and osteopathic physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, podiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists; however, it does not reimburse the same services provided by chiropractic physicians. Advocates for expanded coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare cite clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction, whereas critics point to unnecessary services, inadequate clinical documentation, and projected cost increases. To further inform this debate, the purpose of this commentary is to address the following questions: (1) What are the barriers to expand coverage for chiropractic services? (2) What could potentially be done to address these issues? (3) Is there a rationale for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to expand coverage for chiropractic services?

Methods

A literature search was conducted of Google and PubMed for peer-reviewed articles and US government reports relevant to the provision of chiropractic care under Medicare. We reviewed relevant articles and reports to identify key issues concerning the expansion of coverage for chiropractic under Medicare, including identification of barriers and rationale for expanded coverage.

Results

The literature search yielded 29 peer-reviewed articles and 7 federal government reports. Our review of these documents revealed 3 key barriers to full coverage of chiropractic services under Medicare: inadequate documentation of chiropractic claims, possible provision of unnecessary preventive care services, and the uncertain costs of expanded coverage. Our recommendations to address these barriers include the following: individual chiropractic physicians, as well as state and national chiropractic organizations, should continue to strengthen efforts to improve claims and documentation practices; and additional rigorous efficacy/effectiveness research and clinical studies for chiropractic services need to be performed. Research of chiropractic services should target the triple aim of high-quality care, affordability, and improved health.

Conclusions

The barriers that were identified in this study can be addressed. To overcome these barriers, the chiropractic profession and individual physicians must assume responsibility for correcting deficiencies in compliance and documentation; further research needs to be done to evaluate chiropractic services; and effectiveness of extended episodes of preventive chiropractic care should be rigorously evaluated. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services policies related to chiropractic reimbursement should be reexamined using the same standards applicable to other health care providers. The integration of chiropractic physicians as fully engaged Medicare providers has the potential to enhance the capacity of the Medicare workforce to care for the growing population. We recommend that Medicare policy makers consider limited expansion of Medicare coverage to include, at a minimum, reimbursement for evaluation and management services by chiropractic physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities
Journal of Chiropractic Humanities Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信