美学修复材料在可乐饮料中暴露于不同浸泡制度后表面粗糙度的变化。

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2014-03-23 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/353926
Navroop Kaur Bajwa, Anuradha Pathak
{"title":"美学修复材料在可乐饮料中暴露于不同浸泡制度后表面粗糙度的变化。","authors":"Navroop Kaur Bajwa,&nbsp;Anuradha Pathak","doi":"10.1155/2014/353926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Context. An in vitro study carried out to evaluate and compare the effect of Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Purpose. To compare the effect of different immersion regimes in a Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Method. Two hundred samples were grouped into 4 equal groups of 50 samples each: Group I: conventional glass ionomer, Group II: resin modified glass ionomer, Group III: polyacid-modified resin composite, Group IV: Composite resin. Each group was further subdivided into 5 subgroups of 10 samples each. Subgroup A (Control Subgroup). Samples were kept immersed in artificial saliva. Subgroup B. Samples were immersed in Cola drink once a day. Subgroup C. Samples were immersed in Cola drink, 3 times a day. Subgroup D. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 5 times a day. Subgroup E. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 10 times a day. Each immersion lasted 5 minutes. The immersion protocol was repeated for 7 days. Results. Maximum surface roughness was seen in Group I conventional glass ionomer cement, followed by Group II resin modified glass ionomer, Group III polyacid modified resin composite, and Group IV composite resin samples. Conclusion. Resistance to change in surface roughness is more in resin based restorative materials as compared to glass ionomer based materials. </p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2014 ","pages":"353926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/353926","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink.\",\"authors\":\"Navroop Kaur Bajwa,&nbsp;Anuradha Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/353926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Context. An in vitro study carried out to evaluate and compare the effect of Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Purpose. To compare the effect of different immersion regimes in a Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Method. Two hundred samples were grouped into 4 equal groups of 50 samples each: Group I: conventional glass ionomer, Group II: resin modified glass ionomer, Group III: polyacid-modified resin composite, Group IV: Composite resin. Each group was further subdivided into 5 subgroups of 10 samples each. Subgroup A (Control Subgroup). Samples were kept immersed in artificial saliva. Subgroup B. Samples were immersed in Cola drink once a day. Subgroup C. Samples were immersed in Cola drink, 3 times a day. Subgroup D. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 5 times a day. Subgroup E. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 10 times a day. Each immersion lasted 5 minutes. The immersion protocol was repeated for 7 days. Results. Maximum surface roughness was seen in Group I conventional glass ionomer cement, followed by Group II resin modified glass ionomer, Group III polyacid modified resin composite, and Group IV composite resin samples. Conclusion. Resistance to change in surface roughness is more in resin based restorative materials as compared to glass ionomer based materials. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"353926\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/353926\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/353926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/353926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

上下文。为了评价和比较可乐饮料对美学修复材料表面粗糙度的影响,进行了体外研究。目的。比较可乐饮料中不同浸泡制度对美学修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。方法。200个样品分为4组,每组50个样品:第一组:常规玻璃离聚体,第二组:树脂改性玻璃离聚体,第三组:聚酸改性树脂复合材料,第四组:复合树脂。每组再细分为5个亚组,每个亚组10个样本。子组A (Control Subgroup)。样品浸泡在人工唾液中。b组:每天一次将样品浸泡在可乐饮料中。c组:将样品浸泡在可乐饮料中,每天3次。分组d:每天5次将样品浸泡在可乐饮料中。e组:每天将样品浸泡在可乐饮料中10次。每次浸泡5分钟。浸泡方案重复7天。结果。I组常规玻璃离聚体水泥的表面粗糙度最大,其次是II组树脂改性玻璃离聚体、III组聚酸改性树脂复合材料和IV组复合树脂样品。结论。与玻璃离子基材料相比,树脂基修复材料对表面粗糙度变化的抵抗力更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink.

Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink.

Context. An in vitro study carried out to evaluate and compare the effect of Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Purpose. To compare the effect of different immersion regimes in a Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Method. Two hundred samples were grouped into 4 equal groups of 50 samples each: Group I: conventional glass ionomer, Group II: resin modified glass ionomer, Group III: polyacid-modified resin composite, Group IV: Composite resin. Each group was further subdivided into 5 subgroups of 10 samples each. Subgroup A (Control Subgroup). Samples were kept immersed in artificial saliva. Subgroup B. Samples were immersed in Cola drink once a day. Subgroup C. Samples were immersed in Cola drink, 3 times a day. Subgroup D. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 5 times a day. Subgroup E. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 10 times a day. Each immersion lasted 5 minutes. The immersion protocol was repeated for 7 days. Results. Maximum surface roughness was seen in Group I conventional glass ionomer cement, followed by Group II resin modified glass ionomer, Group III polyacid modified resin composite, and Group IV composite resin samples. Conclusion. Resistance to change in surface roughness is more in resin based restorative materials as compared to glass ionomer based materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信