定义自闭症:各州教育机构对自闭症谱系障碍的定义和评估的差异。

Autism Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-06-02 DOI:10.1155/2014/327271
Malinda L Pennington, Douglas Cullinan, Louise B Southern
{"title":"定义自闭症:各州教育机构对自闭症谱系障碍的定义和评估的差异。","authors":"Malinda L Pennington,&nbsp;Douglas Cullinan,&nbsp;Louise B Southern","doi":"10.1155/2014/327271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of the steady rise in the prevalence of students with autism, this study examined the definition of autism published by state education agencies (SEAs), as well as SEA-indicated evaluation procedures for determining student qualification for autism. We compared components of each SEA definition to aspects of autism from two authoritative sources: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) and Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA-2004). We also compared SEA-indicated evaluation procedures across SEAs to evaluation procedures noted in IDEA-2004. Results indicated that many more SEA definitions incorporate IDEA-2004 features than DSM-IV-TR features. However, despite similar foundations, SEA definitions of autism displayed considerable variability. Evaluation procedures were found to vary even more across SEAs. Moreover, within any particular SEA there often was little concordance between the definition (what autism is) and evaluation procedures (how autism is recognized). Recommendations for state and federal policy changes are discussed. </p>","PeriodicalId":8659,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research and Treatment","volume":"2014 ","pages":"327271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/327271","citationCount":"63","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining autism: variability in state education agency definitions of and evaluations for autism spectrum disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Malinda L Pennington,&nbsp;Douglas Cullinan,&nbsp;Louise B Southern\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/327271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In light of the steady rise in the prevalence of students with autism, this study examined the definition of autism published by state education agencies (SEAs), as well as SEA-indicated evaluation procedures for determining student qualification for autism. We compared components of each SEA definition to aspects of autism from two authoritative sources: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) and Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA-2004). We also compared SEA-indicated evaluation procedures across SEAs to evaluation procedures noted in IDEA-2004. Results indicated that many more SEA definitions incorporate IDEA-2004 features than DSM-IV-TR features. However, despite similar foundations, SEA definitions of autism displayed considerable variability. Evaluation procedures were found to vary even more across SEAs. Moreover, within any particular SEA there often was little concordance between the definition (what autism is) and evaluation procedures (how autism is recognized). Recommendations for state and federal policy changes are discussed. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"327271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/327271\",\"citationCount\":\"63\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/327271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/6/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/327271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/6/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

摘要

鉴于自闭症学生的患病率稳步上升,本研究检查了国家教育机构(sea)公布的自闭症定义,以及sea指示的确定学生自闭症资格的评估程序。我们将每个SEA定义的组成部分与来自两个权威来源的自闭症方面进行了比较:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV-TR)和《残疾人教育改善法案》(IDEA-2004)。我们还将sea指示的评估程序与IDEA-2004中指出的评估程序进行了比较。结果表明,与DSM-IV-TR相比,更多的SEA定义包含了IDEA-2004特征。然而,尽管有相似的基础,SEA对自闭症的定义显示出相当大的差异。评估程序在sea之间的差异更大。此外,在任何特定的SEA中,定义(自闭症是什么)和评估程序(如何识别自闭症)之间往往很少有一致性。讨论了对州和联邦政策变化的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining autism: variability in state education agency definitions of and evaluations for autism spectrum disorders.

In light of the steady rise in the prevalence of students with autism, this study examined the definition of autism published by state education agencies (SEAs), as well as SEA-indicated evaluation procedures for determining student qualification for autism. We compared components of each SEA definition to aspects of autism from two authoritative sources: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR) and Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA-2004). We also compared SEA-indicated evaluation procedures across SEAs to evaluation procedures noted in IDEA-2004. Results indicated that many more SEA definitions incorporate IDEA-2004 features than DSM-IV-TR features. However, despite similar foundations, SEA definitions of autism displayed considerable variability. Evaluation procedures were found to vary even more across SEAs. Moreover, within any particular SEA there often was little concordance between the definition (what autism is) and evaluation procedures (how autism is recognized). Recommendations for state and federal policy changes are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信