古菌:多样化生命的第一个领域。

IF 2.3 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Archaea-An International Microbiological Journal Pub Date : 2014-06-02 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/590214
Gustavo Caetano-Anollés, Arshan Nasir, Kaiyue Zhou, Derek Caetano-Anollés, Jay E Mittenthal, Feng-Jie Sun, Kyung Mo Kim
{"title":"古菌:多样化生命的第一个领域。","authors":"Gustavo Caetano-Anollés, Arshan Nasir, Kaiyue Zhou, Derek Caetano-Anollés, Jay E Mittenthal, Feng-Jie Sun, Kyung Mo Kim","doi":"10.1155/2014/590214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of the origin of diversified life has been plagued by technical and conceptual difficulties, controversy, and apriorism. It is now popularly accepted that the universal tree of life is rooted in the akaryotes and that Archaea and Eukarya are sister groups to each other. However, evolutionary studies have overwhelmingly focused on nucleic acid and protein sequences, which partially fulfill only two of the three main steps of phylogenetic analysis, formulation of realistic evolutionary models, and optimization of tree reconstruction. In the absence of character polarization, that is, the ability to identify ancestral and derived character states, any statement about the rooting of the tree of life should be considered suspect. Here we show that macromolecular structure and a new phylogenetic framework of analysis that focuses on the parts of biological systems instead of the whole provide both deep and reliable phylogenetic signal and enable us to put forth hypotheses of origin. We review over a decade of phylogenomic studies, which mine information in a genomic census of millions of encoded proteins and RNAs. We show how the use of process models of molecular accumulation that comply with Weston's generality criterion supports a consistent phylogenomic scenario in which the origin of diversified life can be traced back to the early history of Archaea. </p>","PeriodicalId":49105,"journal":{"name":"Archaea-An International Microbiological Journal","volume":"2014 ","pages":"590214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Archaea: the first domain of diversified life.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Caetano-Anollés, Arshan Nasir, Kaiyue Zhou, Derek Caetano-Anollés, Jay E Mittenthal, Feng-Jie Sun, Kyung Mo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/590214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study of the origin of diversified life has been plagued by technical and conceptual difficulties, controversy, and apriorism. It is now popularly accepted that the universal tree of life is rooted in the akaryotes and that Archaea and Eukarya are sister groups to each other. However, evolutionary studies have overwhelmingly focused on nucleic acid and protein sequences, which partially fulfill only two of the three main steps of phylogenetic analysis, formulation of realistic evolutionary models, and optimization of tree reconstruction. In the absence of character polarization, that is, the ability to identify ancestral and derived character states, any statement about the rooting of the tree of life should be considered suspect. Here we show that macromolecular structure and a new phylogenetic framework of analysis that focuses on the parts of biological systems instead of the whole provide both deep and reliable phylogenetic signal and enable us to put forth hypotheses of origin. We review over a decade of phylogenomic studies, which mine information in a genomic census of millions of encoded proteins and RNAs. We show how the use of process models of molecular accumulation that comply with Weston's generality criterion supports a consistent phylogenomic scenario in which the origin of diversified life can be traced back to the early history of Archaea. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaea-An International Microbiological Journal\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"590214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4060292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaea-An International Microbiological Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/590214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaea-An International Microbiological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/590214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对多样化生命起源的研究一直受到技术和概念上的困难、争议和先验论的困扰。目前,人们普遍认为,世界生命之树植根于原核生物,古细菌和真核生物是彼此的姊妹群。然而,进化研究绝大多数都集中在核酸和蛋白质序列上,而核酸和蛋白质序列只能部分完成系统进化分析、制定现实的进化模型和优化生命树重建三个主要步骤中的两个。在缺乏特征极化(即识别祖先和衍生特征状态的能力)的情况下,任何关于生命之树根系的声明都应被视为可疑。在这里,我们展示了大分子结构和一种新的系统发育分析框架,它侧重于生物系统的部分而非整体,提供了深入而可靠的系统发育信号,使我们能够提出起源假说。我们回顾了十多年来的系统发生学研究,这些研究从数百万个编码蛋白质和 RNA 的基因组普查中挖掘信息。我们展示了如何使用符合韦斯顿通用性标准的分子积累过程模型来支持一个一致的系统发生学方案,在这个方案中,多样化生命的起源可以追溯到古细菌的早期历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Archaea: the first domain of diversified life.

Archaea: the first domain of diversified life.

Archaea: the first domain of diversified life.

Archaea: the first domain of diversified life.

The study of the origin of diversified life has been plagued by technical and conceptual difficulties, controversy, and apriorism. It is now popularly accepted that the universal tree of life is rooted in the akaryotes and that Archaea and Eukarya are sister groups to each other. However, evolutionary studies have overwhelmingly focused on nucleic acid and protein sequences, which partially fulfill only two of the three main steps of phylogenetic analysis, formulation of realistic evolutionary models, and optimization of tree reconstruction. In the absence of character polarization, that is, the ability to identify ancestral and derived character states, any statement about the rooting of the tree of life should be considered suspect. Here we show that macromolecular structure and a new phylogenetic framework of analysis that focuses on the parts of biological systems instead of the whole provide both deep and reliable phylogenetic signal and enable us to put forth hypotheses of origin. We review over a decade of phylogenomic studies, which mine information in a genomic census of millions of encoded proteins and RNAs. We show how the use of process models of molecular accumulation that comply with Weston's generality criterion supports a consistent phylogenomic scenario in which the origin of diversified life can be traced back to the early history of Archaea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archaea is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles dealing with all aspects of archaea, including environmental adaptation, enzymology, genetics and genomics, metabolism, molecular biology, molecular ecology, phylogeny, and ultrastructure. Bioinformatics studies and biotechnological implications of archaea will be considered. Published since 2002, Archaea provides a unique venue for exchanging information about these extraordinary prokaryotes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信