肩关节骨性关节炎患者肩关节置换术后翻修的预后和风险。

Jeppe V Rasmussen
{"title":"肩关节骨性关节炎患者肩关节置换术后翻修的预后和风险。","authors":"Jeppe V Rasmussen","doi":"10.3109/17453674.2014.922007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This thesis includes four studies focusing on the functional outcome, shoulder-specific quality of life and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis without symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The Danish version of WOOS, translated according to international standardized guidelines, had substantial psychometric properties comparable to the original version. It is recommendable to use WOOS in the evaluation of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with shoulder replacement. Data from DSR showed that the shoulder specific quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty (resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty). The difference between stemmed hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was small and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The revision rate following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was surprisingly high compared with previous reports but there were no statistical significant differences in revision rate between arthroplasty designs. The shoulder specific quality of life and revision rate in patients under the age of 55 was worrying. The use of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty has relied on the results from case series only. The efficacy in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been promising but the CMS found in the randomized clinical trial indicate that the functional outcome may be inferior to that of stemmed hemiarthroplasty and less favourable than previously reported. However, the limited number of patients may have influenced the results and a larger definitive RCT is needed.Shoulder replacement is relevant and effective in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was associated with a poorer outcome and a higher risk of revision than previously assumed especially in patients under the age of 55. Based on data from this thesis, and based on existing knowledge, it seems like total shoulder arthroplasty should be preferred in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder replacement is rarely indicated in younger patients where other treatment options (e.g., physiotherapy; intraarticular injections of hyaluronate; and joint preserving surgery) should be considered until the efficacy of shoulder replacement has been more thoroughly documented.</p>","PeriodicalId":87168,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum","volume":"85 355","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17453674.2014.922007","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Jeppe V Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/17453674.2014.922007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This thesis includes four studies focusing on the functional outcome, shoulder-specific quality of life and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis without symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The Danish version of WOOS, translated according to international standardized guidelines, had substantial psychometric properties comparable to the original version. It is recommendable to use WOOS in the evaluation of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with shoulder replacement. Data from DSR showed that the shoulder specific quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty (resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty). The difference between stemmed hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was small and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The revision rate following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was surprisingly high compared with previous reports but there were no statistical significant differences in revision rate between arthroplasty designs. The shoulder specific quality of life and revision rate in patients under the age of 55 was worrying. The use of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty has relied on the results from case series only. The efficacy in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been promising but the CMS found in the randomized clinical trial indicate that the functional outcome may be inferior to that of stemmed hemiarthroplasty and less favourable than previously reported. However, the limited number of patients may have influenced the results and a larger definitive RCT is needed.Shoulder replacement is relevant and effective in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was associated with a poorer outcome and a higher risk of revision than previously assumed especially in patients under the age of 55. Based on data from this thesis, and based on existing knowledge, it seems like total shoulder arthroplasty should be preferred in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder replacement is rarely indicated in younger patients where other treatment options (e.g., physiotherapy; intraarticular injections of hyaluronate; and joint preserving surgery) should be considered until the efficacy of shoulder replacement has been more thoroughly documented.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum\",\"volume\":\"85 355\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17453674.2014.922007\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.922007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.922007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

本文包括四项研究,重点关注无症状性肩袖病变的肩关节骨性关节炎患者肩关节置换术后的功能结局、肩关节特异性生活质量和翻修风险。根据国际标准化指南翻译的丹麦语版WOOS具有与原始版本相当的实质性心理测量特性。推荐使用WOOS评估肩关节置换术治疗的肩关节骨性关节炎患者。DSR的数据显示,全肩关节置换术后的肩部特定生活质量优于半肩关节置换术(表面半肩关节置换术和干半肩关节置换术)。干半关节置换术和表面置换半关节置换术之间的差异很小,不超过最小的临床重要差异。与以前的报道相比,表面置换半关节置换术后的翻修率惊人地高,但不同关节置换术设计之间的翻修率没有统计学上的显著差异。55岁以下患者的肩部特异性生活质量和修复率令人担忧。表面置换半关节置换术的使用仅依赖于病例序列的结果。治疗肩关节骨性关节炎的疗效一直很有希望,但在随机临床试验中发现的CMS表明,其功能结果可能不如半关节置换术,并且不如先前报道的那样有利。然而,有限的患者数量可能影响了结果,需要更大的确定性随机对照试验。肩关节置换术治疗肩关节骨性关节炎相关且有效;然而,与先前的假设相比,置换半关节置换术的预后较差,翻修风险较高,尤其是55岁以下的患者。根据本论文的数据和现有的知识,似乎全肩关节置换术应该是治疗肩关节骨性关节炎的首选方法。在其他治疗方案(如物理治疗;关节内注射透明质酸;在肩关节置换术的疗效得到更彻底的证实之前,应该考虑关节保留手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

This thesis includes four studies focusing on the functional outcome, shoulder-specific quality of life and risk of revision following shoulder replacement in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis without symptomatic rotator cuff pathology. The Danish version of WOOS, translated according to international standardized guidelines, had substantial psychometric properties comparable to the original version. It is recommendable to use WOOS in the evaluation of patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis treated with shoulder replacement. Data from DSR showed that the shoulder specific quality of life following total shoulder arthroplasty was superior to that of hemiarthroplasty (resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty). The difference between stemmed hemiarthroplasty and resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was small and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. The revision rate following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was surprisingly high compared with previous reports but there were no statistical significant differences in revision rate between arthroplasty designs. The shoulder specific quality of life and revision rate in patients under the age of 55 was worrying. The use of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty has relied on the results from case series only. The efficacy in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis has been promising but the CMS found in the randomized clinical trial indicate that the functional outcome may be inferior to that of stemmed hemiarthroplasty and less favourable than previously reported. However, the limited number of patients may have influenced the results and a larger definitive RCT is needed.Shoulder replacement is relevant and effective in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis; however, resurfacing hemiarthroplasty was associated with a poorer outcome and a higher risk of revision than previously assumed especially in patients under the age of 55. Based on data from this thesis, and based on existing knowledge, it seems like total shoulder arthroplasty should be preferred in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Shoulder replacement is rarely indicated in younger patients where other treatment options (e.g., physiotherapy; intraarticular injections of hyaluronate; and joint preserving surgery) should be considered until the efficacy of shoulder replacement has been more thoroughly documented.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信