The FacharztDuell:创新的医学职业咨询。

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2014-05-15 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000909
Lena Welbergen, Severin Pinilla, Tanja Pander, Maximilian Gradel, Philip von der Borch, Martin R Fischer, Konstantinos Dimitriadis
{"title":"The FacharztDuell:创新的医学职业咨询。","authors":"Lena Welbergen,&nbsp;Severin Pinilla,&nbsp;Tanja Pander,&nbsp;Maximilian Gradel,&nbsp;Philip von der Borch,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dimitriadis","doi":"10.3205/zma000909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The selection of a future medical specialty is a challenge all medical students face during the course of their studies. Students can choose from more than sixty specialties after graduation. There is usually no structured career counselling program available at German medical faculties. So far only little data on acceptance, formats and effects of different career counselling programs are available. The aim of this study is to describe an innovative format of career counselling for medical students including its evaluation of acceptance and its possible influence on medical specialty preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The need for career counselling became evident after the analysis of mentor-mentee conversations held within the mentoring program of our medical faculty, an online-based survey, an ad-hoc focus group and a pilot event. Panel discussions as an interactive format of presenting related medical specialties were developed and hence held four times under the name \"FacharztDuell\". Students evaluated all events separately with a questionnaire and changes in medical specialty choice preferences were documented using an Audience-Response-System (ARS). The FacharztDuell is organized regularly and supported by faculty teaching funds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the student body FacharztDuell was well accepted (an average of 300 participants/event) and rated (average grade of 1.8 (SD= 0.7, 1=very good, 6=unsatisfactory, n=424). On average, 77.8% of the participating students considered the FacharztDuell to be a decision support for their future selection of a specialty. Up to 12% of the students changed their medical specialty choice preference throughout the event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FacharztDuell was well accepted by medical students of all semesters and seems to be supportive for their selection of a future medical specialty. However, longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the decision making process of medical students along their career path. The FacharztDuell is easily transferrable to other faculties with respect to organization, staff and technical resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 2","pages":"Doc17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000909","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The FacharztDuell: innovative career counselling in medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Lena Welbergen,&nbsp;Severin Pinilla,&nbsp;Tanja Pander,&nbsp;Maximilian Gradel,&nbsp;Philip von der Borch,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dimitriadis\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma000909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The selection of a future medical specialty is a challenge all medical students face during the course of their studies. Students can choose from more than sixty specialties after graduation. There is usually no structured career counselling program available at German medical faculties. So far only little data on acceptance, formats and effects of different career counselling programs are available. The aim of this study is to describe an innovative format of career counselling for medical students including its evaluation of acceptance and its possible influence on medical specialty preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The need for career counselling became evident after the analysis of mentor-mentee conversations held within the mentoring program of our medical faculty, an online-based survey, an ad-hoc focus group and a pilot event. Panel discussions as an interactive format of presenting related medical specialties were developed and hence held four times under the name \\\"FacharztDuell\\\". Students evaluated all events separately with a questionnaire and changes in medical specialty choice preferences were documented using an Audience-Response-System (ARS). The FacharztDuell is organized regularly and supported by faculty teaching funds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the student body FacharztDuell was well accepted (an average of 300 participants/event) and rated (average grade of 1.8 (SD= 0.7, 1=very good, 6=unsatisfactory, n=424). On average, 77.8% of the participating students considered the FacharztDuell to be a decision support for their future selection of a specialty. Up to 12% of the students changed their medical specialty choice preference throughout the event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FacharztDuell was well accepted by medical students of all semesters and seems to be supportive for their selection of a future medical specialty. However, longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the decision making process of medical students along their career path. The FacharztDuell is easily transferrable to other faculties with respect to organization, staff and technical resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"Doc17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000909\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:未来医学专业的选择是所有医学生在学习过程中面临的挑战。学生毕业后可以从60多个专业中选择。德国医学院通常没有结构化的职业咨询课程。迄今为止,关于不同职业咨询项目的接受程度、形式和效果的数据很少。本研究的目的是描述一种创新的医学生职业咨询格式,包括其接受度评估及其对医学专业偏好的可能影响。方法:在分析了我们医学院指导项目中导师与学员之间的对话、一项在线调查、一个特别焦点小组和一个试点活动后,职业咨询的必要性变得明显起来。小组讨论是介绍相关医学专业的一种互动形式,因此以"FacharztDuell"的名义举行了四次。学生们用问卷分别评估所有事件,并使用观众反应系统(ARS)记录医学专业选择偏好的变化。法哈兹戴尔是定期组织的,并由教师教学基金支持。结果:在学生群体中,FacharztDuell得到了很好的接受(平均300人/次)和评价(平均评分1.8分(SD= 0.7, 1=很好,6=不满意,n=424)。平均而言,77.8%的参与调查的学生认为法哈兹戴尔大学是他们未来选择专业的决策支持。多达12%的学生在整个事件中改变了他们的医学专业选择偏好。结论:FacharztDuell在所有学期的医学生中都很受欢迎,并似乎支持他们选择未来的医学专业。然而,为了更好地了解医学生在职业道路上的决策过程,有必要进行纵向研究。在组织、人员和技术资源方面,FacharztDuell很容易转移到其他院系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The FacharztDuell: innovative career counselling in medicine.

The FacharztDuell: innovative career counselling in medicine.

The FacharztDuell: innovative career counselling in medicine.

The FacharztDuell: innovative career counselling in medicine.

Objective: The selection of a future medical specialty is a challenge all medical students face during the course of their studies. Students can choose from more than sixty specialties after graduation. There is usually no structured career counselling program available at German medical faculties. So far only little data on acceptance, formats and effects of different career counselling programs are available. The aim of this study is to describe an innovative format of career counselling for medical students including its evaluation of acceptance and its possible influence on medical specialty preferences.

Methods: The need for career counselling became evident after the analysis of mentor-mentee conversations held within the mentoring program of our medical faculty, an online-based survey, an ad-hoc focus group and a pilot event. Panel discussions as an interactive format of presenting related medical specialties were developed and hence held four times under the name "FacharztDuell". Students evaluated all events separately with a questionnaire and changes in medical specialty choice preferences were documented using an Audience-Response-System (ARS). The FacharztDuell is organized regularly and supported by faculty teaching funds.

Results: Among the student body FacharztDuell was well accepted (an average of 300 participants/event) and rated (average grade of 1.8 (SD= 0.7, 1=very good, 6=unsatisfactory, n=424). On average, 77.8% of the participating students considered the FacharztDuell to be a decision support for their future selection of a specialty. Up to 12% of the students changed their medical specialty choice preference throughout the event.

Conclusion: FacharztDuell was well accepted by medical students of all semesters and seems to be supportive for their selection of a future medical specialty. However, longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand the decision making process of medical students along their career path. The FacharztDuell is easily transferrable to other faculties with respect to organization, staff and technical resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信