自我和代理受访者间隔一年报告的吸烟状况的一致性和撤诉。

Julia N Soulakova, Lisa J Crockett
{"title":"自我和代理受访者间隔一年报告的吸烟状况的一致性和撤诉。","authors":"Julia N Soulakova,&nbsp;Lisa J Crockett","doi":"10.4172/2324-9005.1000114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":90201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addictive behaviors, therapy & rehabilitation","volume":"3 1","pages":"1000113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005384/pdf/nihms575604.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency and Recanting of Ever-Smoking Status Reported by Self and Proxy Respondents One Year Apart.\",\"authors\":\"Julia N Soulakova,&nbsp;Lisa J Crockett\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2324-9005.1000114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of addictive behaviors, therapy & rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1000113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4005384/pdf/nihms575604.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of addictive behaviors, therapy & rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9005.1000114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addictive behaviors, therapy & rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2324-9005.1000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

该研究检查了有关当前和以前吸烟行为的报告的一致性。数据来自2002-2003年《当前人口调查烟草使用补充》,其中自我调查对象和代理调查对象分两次报告当前吸烟行为和吸烟史,间隔一年。总体而言,吸烟状况的报告是一致的:Kappa系数为0.78,相应的95%置信区间为(0.77,0.78)。对于在后一次评估中被确定为从不吸烟者和在前一次评估中被确定为曾经或现在吸烟者的应答者,评估了先前报告的一种特定类型的不一致。根据控制多被调查者特征和调查管理方法的调查逻辑回归,估计不一致的自我报告患病率为9.0%,不一致的代理报告患病率为5.4%。此外,还评估了以前声称自己曾经吸烟或现在吸烟的受访者放弃报告的流行程度,即今后不再吸烟。撤销报告在代理报告和已戒烟者中最为普遍:目前吸烟者撤销报告的总体患病率估计在13% - 19%之间,已戒烟者为27% - 46%。我们的研究结果表明,虽然出乎意料的是,代理受访者比自我受访者更有可能持续报告吸烟状况,但代理受访者也更有可能错误地报告吸烟者(尤其是青少年和年轻人)未来从不吸烟。因此,观察到的代理受访者的更高水平的一致性可能是由于代理的不正确的知识,导致一致但模棱两可的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consistency and Recanting of Ever-Smoking Status Reported by Self and Proxy Respondents One Year Apart.

The study examined consistency of reports concerning current and prior smoking behaviors. Data came from the 2002-2003 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, where the current smoking behaviors and smoking history were reported by self- and proxy-respondents on two occasions, one year apart. The ever-smoking status is reported consistently, overall: Kappa coefficient is 0.78 with the corresponding 95% confidence interval given by (0.77, 0.78). One specific type of inconsistency of prior reports was assessed for respondents who were identified as never smokers at the latter assessment and former or current smokers at the earlier assessment. Based on the survey logistic regression that controls for multiple respondent characteristics and survey administration method, the estimated prevalence of such inconsistent self-reports is 9.0%, and prevalence of inconsistent proxy-reports is 5.4%. In addition, prevalence of recanting, i.e., future reporting never smoking for respondents who previously claimed to be a former or a current smoker was assessed. The recanting was shown to be most prevalent with respect to proxy-reports and former smokers: overall prevalence of recanting was estimated to be in the range 13% - 19% for current smokers, and 27% - 46% for former smokers. Our findings indicate that while, unexpectedly, proxy-respondents are more likely to report the ever-smoking status consistently than do self-respondents, the proxies are also more likely to incorrectly report never smoking in the future for smokers especially regarding adolescents and young adults. Therefore, the observed higher level of consistency for proxy-respondents may be due to proxies' incorrect knowledge which leads to consistent yet ambiguous responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信