改善慢性疾病儿童和成人预后的个性化护理计划:一项系统综述

K Casey Lion, Rita Mangione-Smith, Maria T Britto
{"title":"改善慢性疾病儿童和成人预后的个性化护理计划:一项系统综述","authors":"K Casey Lion,&nbsp;Rita Mangione-Smith,&nbsp;Maria T Britto","doi":"10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults and children with chronic illness often require services from multiple providers. Individualized plans of care (IPCs) are sometimes developed to improve care coordination. However, their association with improved outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched literature published between January 2001 and October 2011, using Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and bibliographic review. Eligible studies involved an IPC with input from the patient and/or family of individuals with chronic illness, evaluated outcomes, and were conducted in the United States. We assessed evidence quality using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous regarding populations and outcomes examined and were generally low quality. Most described IPC use within a multifaceted care coordination intervention. The strongest evidence links IPC use and symptom improvement in depressed adults; the weakest evidence exists for outcomes in children. Vague descriptions of the IPCs' limited analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supporting an association between IPC use and improved outcomes, particularly among children, is sparse. Well-designed evaluations of clearly described IPCs are needed to examine who should be involved in their development, what they should include, and how often they should be updated to improve outcomes of care for this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":80262,"journal":{"name":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","volume":"15 1","pages":"11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized plans of care to improve outcomes among children and adults with chronic illness: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"K Casey Lion,&nbsp;Rita Mangione-Smith,&nbsp;Maria T Britto\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults and children with chronic illness often require services from multiple providers. Individualized plans of care (IPCs) are sometimes developed to improve care coordination. However, their association with improved outcomes is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched literature published between January 2001 and October 2011, using Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and bibliographic review. Eligible studies involved an IPC with input from the patient and/or family of individuals with chronic illness, evaluated outcomes, and were conducted in the United States. We assessed evidence quality using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>15 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous regarding populations and outcomes examined and were generally low quality. Most described IPC use within a multifaceted care coordination intervention. The strongest evidence links IPC use and symptom improvement in depressed adults; the weakest evidence exists for outcomes in children. Vague descriptions of the IPCs' limited analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current evidence supporting an association between IPC use and improved outcomes, particularly among children, is sparse. Well-designed evaluations of clearly described IPCs are needed to examine who should be involved in their development, what they should include, and how often they should be updated to improve outcomes of care for this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"11-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Care management journals : Journal of case management ; The journal of long term home health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/1521-0987.15.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

背景:患有慢性疾病的成人和儿童通常需要来自多个提供者的服务。制定个性化护理计划(IPCs)有时是为了改善护理协调。然而,它们与改善预后的关系尚不清楚。方法:检索2001年1月至2011年10月间发表的文献,检索工具包括Medline、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsychINFO和文献综述。符合条件的研究是在美国进行的,包括来自慢性疾病患者和/或患者家属的IPC,评估了结果。我们使用牛津循证医学中心的标准评估证据质量。结果:15项研究符合纳入标准。研究在人群和检查结果方面是异质的,通常质量较低。大多数描述IPC在多方面护理协调干预中的使用。最有力的证据表明,成人抑郁症患者使用IPC与症状改善有关;对儿童的影响证据最弱。对ipcc有限分析的模糊描述。结论:目前支持IPC使用与改善预后之间存在关联的证据很少,特别是在儿童中。需要对明确描述的IPCs进行精心设计的评估,以审查谁应该参与它们的制定,它们应该包括什么,以及它们应该多久更新一次,以改善对这一弱势群体的护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized plans of care to improve outcomes among children and adults with chronic illness: a systematic review.

Background: Adults and children with chronic illness often require services from multiple providers. Individualized plans of care (IPCs) are sometimes developed to improve care coordination. However, their association with improved outcomes is unknown.

Methods: We searched literature published between January 2001 and October 2011, using Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and bibliographic review. Eligible studies involved an IPC with input from the patient and/or family of individuals with chronic illness, evaluated outcomes, and were conducted in the United States. We assessed evidence quality using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria.

Results: 15 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were heterogeneous regarding populations and outcomes examined and were generally low quality. Most described IPC use within a multifaceted care coordination intervention. The strongest evidence links IPC use and symptom improvement in depressed adults; the weakest evidence exists for outcomes in children. Vague descriptions of the IPCs' limited analysis.

Conclusions: Current evidence supporting an association between IPC use and improved outcomes, particularly among children, is sparse. Well-designed evaluations of clearly described IPCs are needed to examine who should be involved in their development, what they should include, and how often they should be updated to improve outcomes of care for this vulnerable population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信