扩张型心肌病患者左房容积与室性心律失常的关系。

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Abdullah Kaplan, Ahmet Gurdal, Cansu Akdeniz, Omer Kiraslan, Ahmet K Bilge
{"title":"扩张型心肌病患者左房容积与室性心律失常的关系。","authors":"Abdullah Kaplan,&nbsp;Ahmet Gurdal,&nbsp;Cansu Akdeniz,&nbsp;Omer Kiraslan,&nbsp;Ahmet K Bilge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between Left Atrial Volume (LAV), a marker of diastolic dysfunction, and the frequency of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in the patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a previously implanted Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 32 patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, each having had an ICD device implanted at least 1 year beforehand. The ventricular arrhythmia episodes which were detected and stored by the device were retrieved and evaluated. In addition to routine echocardiographic measurements, all the patients had their LAV and LAV indexes calculated. After all, student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. Besides, P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was conducted on 4 female and 28 male patients with the mean age of 58.41 ± 9.97 years. Among the study patients, 21 had at least one previous myocardial infarction. In addition, 17 patients had experienced sustained VT or VF within the last year. No significant difference was found between the patients with and without malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained VT or VF) regarding LAV (17 patients with arrhythmia (68 + 23.39 mL) vs. 15 patients without arrhythmia (55.13 ± 20.41 mL); P = 0.100). However, the LAV index was significantly higher in the patients with arrhythmia compared to those without arrhythmia (39.27 ± 12.19 mL / m2 vs. 25.18 ± 7.45 mL / m2; P = 0.004). Both LAV (73.33 ± 17.64 mL and 57.52 ± 23.15 mL, respectively; P = 0.040) and LAV index (40.86 ± 8.47 mL / m2 and 28.20 ± 11.77 mL / m2, respectively; P = 0.010) were significantly greater in the patients with ICD shock therapy within the last year compared to the others. However, both groups were similar regarding Left Ventricular Volume (LVV), LVV index, and ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings demonstrated that LAV and LAV index could be used in detecting the patients who are at high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias.</p>","PeriodicalId":43653,"journal":{"name":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship between Left Atrial Volume and Ventricular Arrhythmias in the Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Kaplan,&nbsp;Ahmet Gurdal,&nbsp;Cansu Akdeniz,&nbsp;Omer Kiraslan,&nbsp;Ahmet K Bilge\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between Left Atrial Volume (LAV), a marker of diastolic dysfunction, and the frequency of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in the patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a previously implanted Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 32 patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, each having had an ICD device implanted at least 1 year beforehand. The ventricular arrhythmia episodes which were detected and stored by the device were retrieved and evaluated. In addition to routine echocardiographic measurements, all the patients had their LAV and LAV indexes calculated. After all, student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. Besides, P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was conducted on 4 female and 28 male patients with the mean age of 58.41 ± 9.97 years. Among the study patients, 21 had at least one previous myocardial infarction. In addition, 17 patients had experienced sustained VT or VF within the last year. No significant difference was found between the patients with and without malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained VT or VF) regarding LAV (17 patients with arrhythmia (68 + 23.39 mL) vs. 15 patients without arrhythmia (55.13 ± 20.41 mL); P = 0.100). However, the LAV index was significantly higher in the patients with arrhythmia compared to those without arrhythmia (39.27 ± 12.19 mL / m2 vs. 25.18 ± 7.45 mL / m2; P = 0.004). Both LAV (73.33 ± 17.64 mL and 57.52 ± 23.15 mL, respectively; P = 0.040) and LAV index (40.86 ± 8.47 mL / m2 and 28.20 ± 11.77 mL / m2, respectively; P = 0.010) were significantly greater in the patients with ICD shock therapy within the last year compared to the others. However, both groups were similar regarding Left Ventricular Volume (LVV), LVV index, and ejection fraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings demonstrated that LAV and LAV index could be used in detecting the patients who are at high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"18-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Cardiovascular Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Cardiovascular Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨左心容量(LAV)与恶性室性心律失常频率之间的关系,LAV是舒张功能障碍的标志,与术前植入植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的左心功能障碍患者发生恶性心律失常的频率有关。方法:本横断面研究对32例缺血性或特发性扩张型心肌病患者进行了研究,每位患者至少在1年前植入了ICD装置。检索和评估装置检测和存储的室性心律失常发作。除常规超声心动图测量外,所有患者均计算LAV及LAV指数。毕竟,我们使用了学生t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Pearson相关来分析数据。以P值< 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:女性4例,男性28例,平均年龄58.41±9.97岁。在研究患者中,21例既往至少有一次心肌梗死。此外,17例患者在过去一年内经历了持续的室速或室颤。恶性室性心律失常患者与非恶性室性心律失常患者LAV无显著差异(有心律失常患者17例(68±23.39 mL)与无心律失常患者15例(55.13±20.41 mL);P = 0.100)。然而,心律失常患者的LAV指数明显高于无心律失常患者(39.27±12.19 mL / m2 vs. 25.18±7.45 mL / m2;P = 0.004)。LAV分别为73.33±17.64 mL和57.52±23.15 mL;P = 0.040), LAV指数分别为40.86±8.47 mL / m2和28.20±11.77 mL / m2;P = 0.010),在最近一年内接受ICD休克治疗的患者中,与其他患者相比,P = 0.010显著增加。然而,两组在左心室容积(LVV)、LVV指数和射血分数方面相似。结论:LAV及LAV指数可用于恶性室性心律失常高危患者的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship between Left Atrial Volume and Ventricular Arrhythmias in the Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Background: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between Left Atrial Volume (LAV), a marker of diastolic dysfunction, and the frequency of malignant ventricular arrhythmia in the patients with left ventricular dysfunction and a previously implanted Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) device.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 32 patients with ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, each having had an ICD device implanted at least 1 year beforehand. The ventricular arrhythmia episodes which were detected and stored by the device were retrieved and evaluated. In addition to routine echocardiographic measurements, all the patients had their LAV and LAV indexes calculated. After all, student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the data. Besides, P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results: This study was conducted on 4 female and 28 male patients with the mean age of 58.41 ± 9.97 years. Among the study patients, 21 had at least one previous myocardial infarction. In addition, 17 patients had experienced sustained VT or VF within the last year. No significant difference was found between the patients with and without malignant ventricular arrhythmias (sustained VT or VF) regarding LAV (17 patients with arrhythmia (68 + 23.39 mL) vs. 15 patients without arrhythmia (55.13 ± 20.41 mL); P = 0.100). However, the LAV index was significantly higher in the patients with arrhythmia compared to those without arrhythmia (39.27 ± 12.19 mL / m2 vs. 25.18 ± 7.45 mL / m2; P = 0.004). Both LAV (73.33 ± 17.64 mL and 57.52 ± 23.15 mL, respectively; P = 0.040) and LAV index (40.86 ± 8.47 mL / m2 and 28.20 ± 11.77 mL / m2, respectively; P = 0.010) were significantly greater in the patients with ICD shock therapy within the last year compared to the others. However, both groups were similar regarding Left Ventricular Volume (LVV), LVV index, and ejection fraction.

Conclusions: The study findings demonstrated that LAV and LAV index could be used in detecting the patients who are at high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Cardiovascular Research Journal
International Cardiovascular Research Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信