眼优势对中年人对比敏感度的影响。

ISRN ophthalmology Pub Date : 2014-03-09 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/903084
Gökhan Pekel, Neşe Alagöz, Evre Pekel, Cengiz Alagöz, Omer Faruk Yılmaz
{"title":"眼优势对中年人对比敏感度的影响。","authors":"Gökhan Pekel,&nbsp;Neşe Alagöz,&nbsp;Evre Pekel,&nbsp;Cengiz Alagöz,&nbsp;Omer Faruk Yılmaz","doi":"10.1155/2014/903084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. Our aim was to compare contrast sensitivity values of the dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged subjects. Material and Methods. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy middle-aged subjects (30 males and 15 females) were included in this study. Patients were aged between 40 and 60 years, having uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/25 or better (Snellen chart). Ocular dominance was determined by hole-in-the-card test. Functional acuity contrast testing (F.A.C.T.) was measured using the Optec 6500 vision testing system (Stereo Optical Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) under both photopic and mesopic conditions. Results. At all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd), under mesopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes were slightly greater than those of the nondominant eyes; but only 18 cpd spatial frequency measurements' difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes were similar at all spatial frequencies (P > 0.05). Conclusions. The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity values of dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged people were similar at all spatial frequencies, except at mesopic 18 cpd spatial frequency. </p>","PeriodicalId":90193,"journal":{"name":"ISRN ophthalmology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"903084"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/903084","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of ocular dominance on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged people.\",\"authors\":\"Gökhan Pekel,&nbsp;Neşe Alagöz,&nbsp;Evre Pekel,&nbsp;Cengiz Alagöz,&nbsp;Omer Faruk Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/903084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose. Our aim was to compare contrast sensitivity values of the dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged subjects. Material and Methods. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy middle-aged subjects (30 males and 15 females) were included in this study. Patients were aged between 40 and 60 years, having uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/25 or better (Snellen chart). Ocular dominance was determined by hole-in-the-card test. Functional acuity contrast testing (F.A.C.T.) was measured using the Optec 6500 vision testing system (Stereo Optical Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) under both photopic and mesopic conditions. Results. At all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd), under mesopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes were slightly greater than those of the nondominant eyes; but only 18 cpd spatial frequency measurements' difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes were similar at all spatial frequencies (P > 0.05). Conclusions. The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity values of dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged people were similar at all spatial frequencies, except at mesopic 18 cpd spatial frequency. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"903084\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/903084\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/903084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/903084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的。我们的目的是比较健康中年受试者的主视眼和非主视眼的对比敏感度值。材料和方法。本研究选取45名健康中年受试者(男30名,女15名)90只眼。患者年龄在40 - 60岁之间,未矫正视力(UCVA)为20/25或更高(Snellen图表)。眼优势采用卡片入洞试验测定。使用Optec 6500视觉测试系统(Stereo Optical Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)在光观和介观两种条件下测量功能性锐度对比测试(F.A.C.T.)。结果。在各空间频率下(1.5、3、6、12和18 cpd),中视条件下,优势眼的对比敏感度值略大于非优势眼;但只有18个cpd空间频率测量差异有统计学意义(P = 0.035)。在光敏条件下,优势眼和非优势眼在各空间频率上的对比敏感度值相似(P > 0.05)。结论。健康中年人的优势眼和非优势眼在除18 cpd空间频率外的所有空间频率上的光度和介观对比灵敏度值都相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of ocular dominance on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged people.

Effects of ocular dominance on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged people.

Effects of ocular dominance on contrast sensitivity in middle-aged people.

Purpose. Our aim was to compare contrast sensitivity values of the dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged subjects. Material and Methods. Ninety eyes of 45 healthy middle-aged subjects (30 males and 15 females) were included in this study. Patients were aged between 40 and 60 years, having uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/25 or better (Snellen chart). Ocular dominance was determined by hole-in-the-card test. Functional acuity contrast testing (F.A.C.T.) was measured using the Optec 6500 vision testing system (Stereo Optical Co. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) under both photopic and mesopic conditions. Results. At all spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd), under mesopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes were slightly greater than those of the nondominant eyes; but only 18 cpd spatial frequency measurements' difference was statistically significant (P = 0.035). Under photopic conditions, the contrast sensitivity values of the dominant eyes and non-dominant eyes were similar at all spatial frequencies (P > 0.05). Conclusions. The photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity values of dominant and nondominant eyes of healthy middle-aged people were similar at all spatial frequencies, except at mesopic 18 cpd spatial frequency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信