某学术医疗中心透析患者住院和急诊资源的利用。

Nephron Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2014-04-08 DOI:10.1159/000360541
Eric Chow, Hannah Wong, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg, Christopher T Chan, Dante Morra
{"title":"某学术医疗中心透析患者住院和急诊资源的利用。","authors":"Eric Chow,&nbsp;Hannah Wong,&nbsp;Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg,&nbsp;Christopher T Chan,&nbsp;Dante Morra","doi":"10.1159/000360541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>End-stage renal disease patients require resources for emergent and inpatient care in addition to ambulatory dialysis. There are two dialysis modalities and settings which patients switch between. Our aim was to characterize the patterns and reasons for switching, as well as the emergent and inpatient utilization of these patients at the University Health Network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received chronic dialysis between March 1, 2006, and April 30, 2011, were identified. Utilization was measured by emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and bed-days occupied per year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 576 patients identified, 18.6% switched modality and/or setting. The majority of switches occurred during the first year of dialysis. Patients who switched had increased utilization compared to those on a continuous modality/setting. Overall, patients had a median rate of 0.91 ED visits per patient-year, compared to 1.56 for patients who switched modality and setting. Median inpatient bed resource requirement was 4.46 bed-days/patient-year overall, compared to 8.91 for patients who switched modality and setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergent and inpatient utilization is related to the setting and modality of dialysis, although differences are partly explained by comorbidities. Patients who switch modalities use more resources and may be a prime population for interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19094,"journal":{"name":"Nephron Clinical Practice","volume":"126 3","pages":"124-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360541","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient and emergent resource use of patients on dialysis at an academic medical center.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Chow,&nbsp;Hannah Wong,&nbsp;Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg,&nbsp;Christopher T Chan,&nbsp;Dante Morra\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000360541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>End-stage renal disease patients require resources for emergent and inpatient care in addition to ambulatory dialysis. There are two dialysis modalities and settings which patients switch between. Our aim was to characterize the patterns and reasons for switching, as well as the emergent and inpatient utilization of these patients at the University Health Network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received chronic dialysis between March 1, 2006, and April 30, 2011, were identified. Utilization was measured by emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and bed-days occupied per year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 576 patients identified, 18.6% switched modality and/or setting. The majority of switches occurred during the first year of dialysis. Patients who switched had increased utilization compared to those on a continuous modality/setting. Overall, patients had a median rate of 0.91 ED visits per patient-year, compared to 1.56 for patients who switched modality and setting. Median inpatient bed resource requirement was 4.46 bed-days/patient-year overall, compared to 8.91 for patients who switched modality and setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergent and inpatient utilization is related to the setting and modality of dialysis, although differences are partly explained by comorbidities. Patients who switch modalities use more resources and may be a prime population for interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephron Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"126 3\",\"pages\":\"124-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000360541\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephron Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephron Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000360541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景/目的:终末期肾病患者需要急诊和住院护理资源,除了门诊透析。有两种透析方式和设置,患者之间切换。我们的目的是描述转换的模式和原因,以及这些患者在大学健康网络的急诊和住院利用。方法:选取2006年3月1日至2011年4月30日接受慢性透析治疗的患者。利用是通过急诊科(ED)的访问量,住院病人的住院时间和每年的住院日来衡量的。结果:在确定的576例患者中,18.6%的患者改变了治疗方式和/或治疗环境。大多数转换发生在透析的第一年。与连续模式/设置的患者相比,切换的患者的利用率更高。总体而言,患者的平均ED就诊率为每患者每年0.91次,而转换模式和环境的患者为1.56次。住院床位资源需求中位数为4.46床日/患者年,而转换模式和环境的患者为8.91床日/患者年。结论:急诊和住院利用与透析的环境和方式有关,尽管合并症部分解释了差异。转换模式的患者使用更多的资源,可能是干预的主要人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inpatient and emergent resource use of patients on dialysis at an academic medical center.

Background/aim: End-stage renal disease patients require resources for emergent and inpatient care in addition to ambulatory dialysis. There are two dialysis modalities and settings which patients switch between. Our aim was to characterize the patterns and reasons for switching, as well as the emergent and inpatient utilization of these patients at the University Health Network.

Methods: Patients who received chronic dialysis between March 1, 2006, and April 30, 2011, were identified. Utilization was measured by emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and bed-days occupied per year.

Results: Out of 576 patients identified, 18.6% switched modality and/or setting. The majority of switches occurred during the first year of dialysis. Patients who switched had increased utilization compared to those on a continuous modality/setting. Overall, patients had a median rate of 0.91 ED visits per patient-year, compared to 1.56 for patients who switched modality and setting. Median inpatient bed resource requirement was 4.46 bed-days/patient-year overall, compared to 8.91 for patients who switched modality and setting.

Conclusions: Emergent and inpatient utilization is related to the setting and modality of dialysis, although differences are partly explained by comorbidities. Patients who switch modalities use more resources and may be a prime population for interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephron Clinical Practice
Nephron Clinical Practice 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信